Literature DB >> 30127915

The diagnostic value of PI-RADS V1 and V2 using multiparametric MRI in transition zone prostate clinical cancer.

Ximing Wang1, Jie Bao1, Xiaoxia Ping1, Chunhong Hu1, Jianquan Hou2, Fenglin Dong3, Lingchuan Guo4.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in the transitional zone (TZ) by 3T multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and to compare the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS V1 to V2 for the detection of PCa in the TZ. A total of 77 patients with suspicious lesions in the prostate TZ (83 cores) identified from mpMRI images acquired at 3T were scored per the PI-RADS system (V1 and V2) criteria. Magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy was performed in patients with at least one lesion classified as category ≥3 in the PI-RADS V1 assessment. The diagnostic performance of PI-RADS V1 for the detection of PCa in the TZ was compared with PI-RADS V2 by assessing the sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. A total of 31 cases of PCa in the TZ and 46 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia were confirmed by pathology, including 23 cases classified as Gleason score ≥7 and 54 cases of negative results and Gleason score 6. PI-RADS V2 exhibited a higher area under the curve (AUC, 0.888) compared with V1 (AUC, 0.869). The sensitivity of V2 (75.0%) was higher compared with that of V1 (68.8%), whereas the specificity of V2 (90.2%) was lower compared with that of V1 (96.1%) at PI-RADS scores of 11 and 4, respectively. The ESUR PI-RADS system may indicate the likelihood of PCa in suspicious lesions in the TZ on mpMRI. These results suggest that PI-RADS V2 performs better compared with V1 for the assessment of PCa in the TZ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound; peripheral zone; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; prostate imaging reporting and data system; transition zone

Year:  2018        PMID: 30127915      PMCID: PMC6096261          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  M C Roethke; T H Kuru; S Schultze; D Tichy; A Kopp-Schneider; M Fenchel; H-P Schlemmer; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [PI-RADS classification: structured reporting for MRI of the prostate].

Authors:  M Röthke; D Blondin; H-P Schlemmer; T Franiel
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2013-02-12

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Peter A Pinto; Paul H Chung; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Angelo A Baccala; Jochen Kruecker; Compton J Benjamin; Sheng Xu; Pingkun Yan; Samuel Kadoury; Celene Chua; Julia K Locklin; Baris Turkbey; Joanna H Shih; Stacey P Gates; Carey Buckner; Gennady Bratslavsky; W Marston Linehan; Neil D Glossop; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology.

Authors:  Sébastien Bouyé; Eric Potiron; Philippe Puech; Xavier Leroy; Laurent Lemaitre; Arnauld Villers
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Sheng Xu; Jochen Kruecker; Baris Turkbey; Neil Glossop; Anurag K Singh; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-09

6.  Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Moritz Kasel-Seibert; Thomas Lehmann; René Aschenbach; Felix V Guettler; Mohamed Abubrig; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Ulf Teichgraeber; Tobias Franiel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Transition zone prostate cancer: incremental value of diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging in tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.

Authors:  Sung Il Jung; Olivio F Donati; Hebert A Vargas; Debra Goldman; Hedvig Hricak; Oguz Akin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Performance of transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy in detecting prostate cancer in the initial and repeat biopsy setting.

Authors:  A V Taira; G S Merrick; R W Galbreath; H Andreini; W Taubenslag; R Curtis; W M Butler; E Adamovich; K E Wallner
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.

Authors:  Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Nikhil Waingankar; Baris Turkbey; Oksana Yaskiv; Anna M Sonstegard; Mathew Fakhoury; Carl A Olsson; David N Siegel; Peter L Choyke; Eran Ben-Levi; Robert Villani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  PI-RADS version 2.1 scoring system is superior in detecting transition zone prostate cancer: a diagnostic study.

Authors:  Zhibing Wang; Wenlu Zhao; Junkang Shen; Zhen Jiang; Shuo Yang; Shuangxiu Tan; Yueyue Zhang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-09

2.  MRI/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Targeted Biopsy and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Systematic Biopsy for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jianfeng Xie; Chunchun Jin; Mengmeng Liu; Kun Sun; Zhanqiang Jin; Zhimin Ding; Xuehao Gong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chau Hung Lee; Balamurugan Vellayappan; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Diagnostic value of integrated 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MRI compared with that of biparametric MRI for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yuping Zeng; Xiaoming Leng; Hengbin Liao; Guihua Jiang; Ping Chen
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Armando Stabile; Francesco Giganti; Veeru Kasivisvanathan; Gianluca Giannarini; Caroline M Moore; Anwar R Padhani; Valeria Panebianco; Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Georg Salomon; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2020-03-17

6.  Correlation of SUVmax and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Detected by Ga-68 PSMA PET/MRI in Primary Prostate Lesions and Their Significance in Lymph Node Metastasis: Preliminary Results of an On-going Study

Authors:  Lebriz Uslu-Beşli; Barış Bakır; Sertaç Asa; Ekrem Güner; Çetin Demirdağ; Onur Erdem Şahin; Emre Karayel; Muhammet Sait Sağer; Haluk Burçak Sayman; Kerim Sönmezoğlu
Journal:  Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther       Date:  2019-09-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.