Literature DB >> 26835055

Observations and Considerations on Patient X-ray Exposure in the Electrophysiology Lab.

Xianxian Jiang1, Lukas Rc Dekker2.   

Abstract

To assess patient radiation during catheter ablation procedures and operator differences. From 84 patients (51 males, age 63 ± 10 years) undergoing complex catheter ablation by three experienced operators we collected: body mass index (BMI), procedure type and time, fluoroscopy time, dose area product (DAP), air kerma and X-ray system setting (cine, collimation and angiographic imaging angle). A new factor, fluoroscopy DAP-fluoroscopy time ratio, was introduced to compare operator differences. The results show the average procedure time was 179 (± 57) minutes (min), fluoroscopy time was 31 (± 21) min, DAP was 26.4 (± 19.6) Gy.cm(2) and air kerma was 0.26 (± 0.19) Gy. Procedure types were: pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) (52 %), redo PVI (11 %), pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) (14 %), ventricular tachycardia (VT) (8 %) and others (15 %). Inter-operator difference was observed in fluoroscopy and cine usage. Fluoroscopy DAP-time ratios showed a similar level of patient radiation dose rate by operator A and B (correlation: 0.89), and a significantly higher dose rate by operator C (correlation: 0.20, p<0.001; 0.26, p<0.01, to operator A and B). In conclusion, operators should be aware of patient radiation exposure levels and the influencing factors. Inter- and intra-operator differences can be measured and bench marked for improvement in X-ray efficiency and patient radiation reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter ablation; electrophysiology; operator difference; patient radiation dose; radiation reduction

Year:  2013        PMID: 26835055      PMCID: PMC4712624          DOI: 10.15420/aer.2013.2.2.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev        ISSN: 2050-3369


  19 in total

Review 1.  Fluoroscopy: patient radiation exposure issues.

Authors:  M Mahesh
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Radiation exposure of patient and physician during implantation and upgrade of cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Christian Butter; Thomas Schau; Juergen Meyhoefer; Klaus Neumann; Hans H Minden; Joerg Engelhardt
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures.

Authors:  K Perisinakis; J Damilakis; N Theocharopoulos; E Manios; P Vardas; N Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Riccardo Cappato; Hugh Calkins; Shih-Ann Chen; Wyn Davies; Yoshito Iesaka; Jonathan Kalman; You-Ho Kim; George Klein; Douglas Packer; Allan Skanes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-02-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Entrance skin dose during radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmia: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Takashi Kidouchi; Shigeru Suzuki; Shigeru Furui; Haruo Mitani; Junichi Nitta; Kunihiro Matsumoto; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.976

6.  Long-term results after ablation of infarct-related ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Oliver R Segal; Anthony W C Chow; Vias Markides; Richard J Schilling; Nicholas S Peters; D Wyn Davies
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Radiation exposure during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lars Lickfett; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Chandra Vasamreddy; David Bradley; Vinod Jayam; Zayd Eldadah; Timm Dickfeld; Deborah Kearney; Darshan Dalal; Berndt Lüderitz; Ronald Berger; Hugh Calkins
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Acute radiation dermatitis following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

Authors:  L S Rosenthal; T J Beck; J Williams; M Mahesh; M G Herman; J L Dinerman; H Calkins; J H Lawrence
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Evaluation of pulmonary vein stenosis after pulmonary vein isolation using a novel circular mapping and ablation catheter (PVAC).

Authors:  Christian von Bary; Stefan Weber; Christian Dornia; Christoph Eissnert; Claudia Fellner; Philipp Latzin; Sabine Fredersdorf; Stefan Stadler; Okka W Hamer
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-08-13

10.  Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections.

Authors:  H Calkins; L Niklason; J Sousa; R el-Atassi; J Langberg; F Morady
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Haas; Christoph M Happel; Maria Mauti; Cherif Sahyoun; Lea Z Tebart; Deniz Kececioglu; Kai Thorsten Laser
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2015-01-20

2.  How significant is the radiation exposure during electrophysiology study and ablation procedures for supraventricular tachycardia?

Authors:  Avishek Bagchi; Ramalingam Vadivelu; Chetan Rathi; Bhavesh Gunaji Chavan; Yash Lokhandwala
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2021-03-17
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.