Literature DB >> 20456650

Radiation exposure of patient and physician during implantation and upgrade of cardiac resynchronization devices.

Christian Butter1, Thomas Schau, Juergen Meyhoefer, Klaus Neumann, Hans H Minden, Joerg Engelhardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is often associated with extended fluoroscopic exposure during placement of the devices. The objective of this study was to measure the radiation exposure sustained by different parts of the body of patients and operators during fluoroscopically guided cardiac resynchronization device implantation.
METHODS: Dosimetry data were prospectively recorded in a series of 104 consecutive patients, who underwent resynchronization device implantation or upgrade in our cardiac catheterization laboratory. Five Chipstrate dosimeters were fixed to the patient's skin around the thorax (right and left paravertebral, right and left parasternal, and sternal positions), one dosimeter was attached to the forehead, and one to the pubis. The operator was equipped with one dosimeter on the forehead at eye level and a ring dosimeter was worn on the right hand.
RESULTS: Based on the maximum radiation dose of 9.2 mSv measured at the operator's hand in a single implantation session, it might be recommended to conservatively limit the number of implantations to four per month (an annual limit value of 500 mSv). At a mean dose of 1.2 mSv, this number can be increased sevenfold.
CONCLUSION: In patients, incipient deterministic radiation effects can theoretically be observed at dose area product >400 Gy*cm(2), a dose applied in 2.9% of CRT implantation procedures. Special follow-up programs are considered necessary for these patients and for operators, as the latter may be exposed over many years given the unknown long-term impact of chronic radiation exposure and the nature of current complex electrophysiology and device procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20456650     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02765.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Yoshiaki Morishima; Koichi Chida; Yoshiaki Katahira
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Three-dimensional mapping in cardiac implantable electronic device - a feasible and effective alternative to fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Xiaozhen Ge; Mengna Chen; Zhongxin Sha; Junmeng Zhang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Observations and Considerations on Patient X-ray Exposure in the Electrophysiology Lab.

Authors:  Xianxian Jiang; Lukas Rc Dekker
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2013-11-29

4.  Multimodality imaging for real-time image-guided left ventricular lead placement during cardiac resynchronization therapy implantations.

Authors:  Odette A E Salden; Hans T van den Broek; Wouter M van Everdingen; Firdaus A A Mohamed Hoesein; Birgitta K Velthuis; Pieter A Doevendans; Maarten-Jan Cramer; Anton E Tuinenburg; Paul Leufkens; Frebus J van Slochteren; Mathias Meine
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Aegrescit medendo: orthopedic disability in electrophysiology - call for fluoroscopy elimination-review and commentary.

Authors:  Donald S Rubenstein; Benjamin B Holmes; Joseph A Manfredi; Matthew S McKillop; Peter C Netzler; Chad C Ward
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 1.759

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.