| Literature DB >> 26834834 |
Cheng Wang1, Da Dong2, Haoshu Wang1, Karin Müller3, Yong Qin1, Hailong Wang4, Weixiang Wu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Compost habitats sustain a vast ensemble of microbes specializing in the degradation of lignocellulosic plant materials and are thus important both for their roles in the global carbon cycle and as potential sources of biochemical catalysts for advanced biofuels production. Studies have revealed substantial diversity in compost microbiomes, yet how this diversity relates to functions and even to the genes encoding lignocellulolytic enzymes remains obscure. Here, we used a metagenomic analysis of the rice straw-adapted (RSA) microbial consortia enriched from compost ecosystems to decipher the systematic and functional contexts within such a distinctive microbiome.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacteria; Compost ecosystem; Lignocellulose degradation; Metagenomics
Year: 2016 PMID: 26834834 PMCID: PMC4731972 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0440-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Phylogenetic composition of bacterial phyla from environmental gene tags (EGTs) and pyrosequence 16S rDNA sequences from the RSA consortia (a), and network for metagenome taxonomic profiling from the bovine, termite, panda, tammar wallaby samples as well as the RSA consortia (b)
Fig. 2Distribution pattern of a COG-assigned and b KEGG-assigned proteins in the RSA consortia. Genes not assignable to any COGs or KEGGs are not shown in this figure. The percentage of matched gene numbers was assigned to specific COG or KEGG functional categories
Fig. 3Phylogenetic distributions of carbohydrate-active enzymes in the most abundant members possessing CAZyme genes. The data were visualized via Circos software [84]. The width of bars from each microbial species and functional enzyme family indicates their relative abundance in the RSA consortia
Glycoside hydrolase profiles targeting plant structural polysaccharides in four metagenomes
| Predominant activity | Termite [ | Bovine [ | Macropod [ | RSA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cellulases | |||||
| GH5 | Cellulases | 7.97 | 1.23 | 4.31 | 2.36 |
| GH6 | Endoglucanases | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| GH7 | Endoglucanases | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| GH9 | Endoglucanases | 1.28 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 1.12 |
| GH44 | Endoglucanases | 0.85 | 0.00 | 1.08 | 0.06 |
| GH45 | Endoglucanases | 0.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| GH48 | Cellobiohydrolases | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Subtotal (%) | 10.67 | 2.15 | 5.92 | 4.60 | |
| Endohemicellulases | |||||
| GH8 | Endoxylanases | 0.71 | 0.61 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
| GH10 | Endo-1,4-β-xylanases | 6.54 | 1.08 | 2.51 | 2.18 |
| GH11 | Xylanases | 1.99 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.47 |
| GH12 | Xyloglucanases | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| GH26 | β-mannanase & xylanases | 2.13 | 0.77 | 2.33 | 0.83 |
| GH28 | Galacturonases | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.54 | 0.65 |
| GH53 | Endo-1,4-β-galactanases | 1.71 | 2.61 | 1.62 | 0.35 |
| Subtotal (%) | 13.94 | 5.99 | 7.36 | 4.90 | |
| Debranching enzymes | |||||
| GH51 | α-L-arabinofuranosidases | 2.56 | 9.83 | 2.33 | 1.42 |
| GH54 | α-L-arabinofuranosidases | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| GH62 | α-L-arabinofuranosidases | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| GH67 | α-glucuronidases | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.35 |
| GH78 | α-L-rhamnosidases | 0.00 | 5.22 | 4.49 | 2.30 |
| Subtotal (%) | 3.98 | 15.21 | 7.72 | 4.43 | |
| Oligosaccharide-degrading enzymes | |||||
| GH1 | β-glucosidases | 3.13 | 1.54 | 11.13 | 3.72 |
| GH2 | β-galactosidases | 3.27 | 28.57 | 5.03 | 1.59 |
| GH3 | β-glucosidases | 9.82 | 27.04 | 13.46 | 4.90 |
| GH29 | α-L-fucosidases | 0.00 | 11.37 | 0.54 | 0.89 |
| GH35 | β-galactosidases | 0.43 | 1.84 | 0.72 | 0.41 |
| GH38 | α-mannosidases | 1.56 | 2.61 | 0.54 | 0.77 |
| GH39 | β-xylosidases | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.18 | 1.89 |
| GH42 | β-galactosidases | 3.41 | 1.69 | 1.62 | 0.83 |
| GH43 | Arabino/xylosidases | 2.28 | 9.37 | 3.41 | 3.01 |
| GH52 | β-xylosidases | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.18 |
| Subtotal (%) | 24.75 | 84.33 | 36.62 | 18.18 | |
| Total GHs | 703 | 651 | 557 | 1694 | |
| % ORFS | 0.78 | 0.78 | 0.71 | 0.97 | |
The listed value is the population abundance weighted relative abundance (%) of GH families among the total GHs
Fig. 4An overview of microbial degradation of cellulose and hemicellulose in the RSA consortia. We show the dominant species that digest the cellulose and hemicellulose by depicting the distribution of genes encoding the CAZymes in the RSA consortia. The purple, pink, green, blue, yellow, gray and brown circles represent the members of phylum Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Chloroflexi, Gemmatimonadetes and Crenarchaeota, respectively. The diameter of each circle is proportional to its relative abundance. A. arabaticum, Acetohalobium arabaticum; A. mediterranei, Amycolatopsis mediterranei; A. missouriensis, Actinoplanes missouriensis; A. vinelandii, Azotobacter vinelandii; B. cellulosilyticus, Bacteroides cellulosilyticus; B. cavernae, Beutenbergia cavernae; C. aerophila, Caldilinea aerophila; C. proteoclasticum, Clostridium proteoclasticum; C. flavigena, Cellulomonas flavigena; C. necator, Cupriavidus necator; C. woesei, Conexibacter woesei; D. alkaliphilus, Dethiobacter alkaliphilus; G. aurantiaca, Gemmatimonas aurantiaca; H. aurantiacus, Herpetosiphon aurantiacus; H. orenii, Halothermothrix orenii; K. flavida, Kribbella flavida; M. aurantiaca, Micromonospora aurantiaca; M. australiensis, Mahella australiensis; M. hydrocarbonoclasticus, Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus; M. lupini, Micromonospora lupini; N. hollandicus, Nitrolancetus hollandicus; P. heparinus, Pedobacter heparinus; P. piscicida, Pseudoalteromonas piscicida; P. dioxanivorans, Pseudonocardia dioxanivorans; P. elgii, Paenibacillu elgii; P. maris, Planctomyces maris; P. mucilaginosus, Paenibacillus mucilaginosus; P. suwonensis, Pseudoxanthomonas suwonensis; R. marinus, Rhodothermus marinus; S. bingchenggensis, Streptomyces bingchenggensis; S. clavuligerus, Streptomyces clavuligerus; S. hellenicus, Staphylothermus hellenicus; S. himastatinicus, Streptomyces himastatinicus; S. linguale, Spirosoma linguale; S. nassauensis, Stackebrandtia nassauensis; S. roseum, Streptosporangium roseum; S. scabiei, Streptomyces scabiei; S. thermophilus, Sphaerobacter thermophilus; T. acetatoxydans, Tepidanaerobacter acetatoxydans; T. curvata, Thermomonospora curvata; T. terrenum, Thermobaculum terrenum; T. turnerae, Teredinibacter turnerae; T. bispora, Thermobispora bispora; T. composti, Thermobacillus composti; T. mathranii, Thermoanaerobacter mathranii; T. potens, Thermincola potens; T. thermosaccharolyticum, Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum; V. maris, Verrucosispora maris. The bubble plot indicates the relative abundances of each microbial species in the RSA consortia
Fig. 5As in Fig. 4 but for microbial degradation of pectin in the RSA consortia