J Camilo Correa1, D Alejandro Mejía2, N Duque3, M Montoya J2, C Morales Uribe2,3. 1. University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. jcccote@yahoo.com. 2. University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. 3. Hospital Universitario San Vicente Fundación, Medellín, Colombia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of abdominal wall closure using the vacuum-assisted closure (NPC) as described by Barker et al. with an institutional protocol using a double polyvinyl bag in the first surgery, which is changed in subsequent surgeries to a polyvinyl bag placed over the bowel loops and a prolene mesh attached to the abdominal fascia (MMFC). METHODS: Randomized controlled trial. Patients with open abdomen (OA) due to a traumatic or a medical cause were included in the study. Variables studied included demographics, indication for surgery, number of interventions, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay, abdominal wound care costs, complication rates, and method and time to definitive fascial closure. RESULTS:From June 2011 to April 2013, 75 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who died within 48 h were excluded; therefore, 53 patients in total were assessed. NPC achieved fascial closure in 75% of patients, and MMFC achieved closure in 71.9% of patients. The closure rates in patients with OA secondary to medical causes (80% by NPC vs. 71.4% by MMFC) or traumatic causes (70% by NPC vs. 73.7% by MMFC) were similar in both treatment groups. There were no differences between the groups with respect to cause of OA, complications, length of hospital stay, or the length of stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION:MMFC is a method comparable to NPC for the temporary management of OA that results in similar closure and complication rates.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of abdominal wall closure using the vacuum-assisted closure (NPC) as described by Barker et al. with an institutional protocol using a double polyvinyl bag in the first surgery, which is changed in subsequent surgeries to a polyvinyl bag placed over the bowel loops and a prolene mesh attached to the abdominal fascia (MMFC). METHODS: Randomized controlled trial. Patients with open abdomen (OA) due to a traumatic or a medical cause were included in the study. Variables studied included demographics, indication for surgery, number of interventions, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay, abdominal wound care costs, complication rates, and method and time to definitive fascial closure. RESULTS: From June 2011 to April 2013, 75 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who died within 48 h were excluded; therefore, 53 patients in total were assessed. NPC achieved fascial closure in 75% of patients, and MMFC achieved closure in 71.9% of patients. The closure rates in patients with OA secondary to medical causes (80% by NPC vs. 71.4% by MMFC) or traumatic causes (70% by NPC vs. 73.7% by MMFC) were similar in both treatment groups. There were no differences between the groups with respect to cause of OA, complications, length of hospital stay, or the length of stay in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: MMFC is a method comparable to NPC for the temporary management of OA that results in similar closure and complication rates.
Authors: Jose J Diaz; Daniel C Cullinane; William D Dutton; Rebecca Jerome; Richard Bagdonas; Jaroslaw W Bilaniuk; Jarolslaw O Bilaniuk; Bryan R Collier; John J Como; John Cumming; Maggie Griffen; Oliver L Gunter; John Kirby; Larry Lottenburg; Nathan Mowery; William P Riordan; Niels Martin; Jon Platz; Nicole Stassen; Eleanor S Winston Journal: J Trauma Date: 2010-06
Authors: Joseph J Dubose; Thomas M Scalea; John B Holcomb; Binod Shrestha; Obi Okoye; Kenji Inaba; Tiffany K Bee; Timothy C Fabian; James Whelan; Rao R Ivatury Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: S Acosta; T Bjarnason; U Petersson; B Pålsson; A Wanhainen; M Svensson; K Djavani; M Björck Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Daniel Perez; Stefan Wildi; Nicolas Demartines; Matthias Bramkamp; Christian Koehler; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Tyler J Loftus; Philip A Efron; Trina M Bala; Martin D Rosenthal; Chasen A Croft; Michael S Walters; R Stephen Smith; Frederick A Moore; Alicia M Mohr; Scott C Brakenridge Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: M López-Cano; J M García-Alamino; S A Antoniou; D Bennet; U A Dietz; F Ferreira; R H Fortelny; P Hernandez-Granados; M Miserez; A Montgomery; S Morales-Conde; F Muysoms; J A Pereira; R Schwab; N Slater; A Vanlander; G H Van Ramshorst; F Berrevoet Journal: Hernia Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 4.739
Authors: Ari Leppäniemi; Matti Tolonen; Antonio Tarasconi; Helmut Segovia-Lohse; Emiliano Gamberini; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Chad G Ball; Neil Parry; Massimo Sartelli; Daan Wolbrink; Harry van Goor; Gianluca Baiocchi; Luca Ansaloni; Walter Biffl; Federico Coccolini; Salomone Di Saverio; Yoram Kluger; Ernest Moore; Fausto Catena Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Yvonne Zens; Michael Barth; Heiner C Bucher; Katrin Dreck; Moritz Felsch; Wolfram Groß; Thomas Jaschinski; Heike Kölsch; Mandy Kromp; Inga Overesch; Stefan Sauerland; Sven Gregor Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2020-10-10
Authors: Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Adolfo González Hadad; David Mejia; Alberto García; Cecibel Cevallos; Amber Nicole Himmler; Yaset Caicedo; Alexander Salcedo; José Julián Serna; Mario Alain Herrera; Luis Fernando Pino; Michael W Parra; Carlos A Ordoñez Journal: Colomb Med (Cali) Date: 2021-06-30