Jasmijn du Long1, Michiel Hageman2, Dick Vuijk2, Alexander Rakic2, D Haverkamp2. 1. Slotervaart Center of Orthopedic Research and Education (SCORE), MC Slotervaart, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Jasmijndulong@gmail.com. 2. Slotervaart Center of Orthopedic Research and Education (SCORE), MC Slotervaart, Louwesweg 6, 1066 EC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is an increasing interest in modern orthopaedic practice to empower patients to participate in shared decision-making. Decision aids are thought to be helpful in this process. Before creating decision aids for patients with osteoarthritis in the knee or hip, the goal was to identify the needs of patients and physicians when deciding about the treatment. Specifically, this study tested the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in decisional conflict between patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Thirty-three orthopaedic surgeons and 172 patients with either knee or hip osteoarthritis were surveyed. Patients entered their demographic information and completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Physicians entered their demographic and professional information and completed the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the Decisional Conflict Scale. RESULTS: The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between patients [mean (SD), 33 (19)] and physicians [mean (SD), 24 (14)], regarding decisional conflict about the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. It also showed that patients' decisional conflict was associated with the patient-doctor relationship, and there was a need for information and clearness of one's values for risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: Patients had a higher magnitude of decisional conflict than physicians and that the level of decisional conflict was positively influenced by the patient-doctor relationship. Patients had high needs regarding information and clearness of one's values for risks and benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
PURPOSE: There is an increasing interest in modern orthopaedic practice to empower patients to participate in shared decision-making. Decision aids are thought to be helpful in this process. Before creating decision aids for patients with osteoarthritis in the knee or hip, the goal was to identify the needs of patients and physicians when deciding about the treatment. Specifically, this study tested the null hypothesis that there is no significant difference in decisional conflict between patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis and orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Thirty-three orthopaedic surgeons and 172 patients with either knee or hip osteoarthritis were surveyed. Patients entered their demographic information and completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework, the Decisional Conflict Scale, the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Physicians entered their demographic and professional information and completed the Assessment of Needs survey based on the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the Decisional Conflict Scale. RESULTS: The results showed that there was a significant difference (P < 0.01) between patients [mean (SD), 33 (19)] and physicians [mean (SD), 24 (14)], regarding decisional conflict about the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. It also showed that patients' decisional conflict was associated with the patient-doctor relationship, and there was a need for information and clearness of one's values for risks and benefits. CONCLUSION:Patients had a higher magnitude of decisional conflict than physicians and that the level of decisional conflict was positively influenced by the patient-doctor relationship. Patients had high needs regarding information and clearness of one's values for risks and benefits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Entities:
Keywords:
Hip osteoarthritis; Knee osteoarthritis; Needs; Treatment
Authors: Haoling H Weng; Robert M Kaplan; W John Boscardin; Catherine H Maclean; Irene Y Lee; Weiling Chen; John D Fitzgerald Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2007-05-15
Authors: Annette M O'Connor; Carol L Bennett; Dawn Stacey; Michael Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Vikki A Entwistle; Valerie Fiset; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sara Khangura; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; David Rovner Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-07-08
Authors: Christina M Van der Feltz-Cornelis; Patricia Van Oppen; Harm W J Van Marwijk; Edwin De Beurs; Richard Van Dyck Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Vanessa B Hurley; Yue Wang; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen M Shortell; Stephen Kearing; Lucy A Savitz Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: Louisa Chou; Lisa Ellis; Michelle Papandony; K L Maheeka D Seneviwickrama; Flavia M Cicuttini; Kaye Sullivan; Andrew J Teichtahl; Yuanyuan Wang; Andrew M Briggs; Anita E Wluka Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aniek A O M Claassen; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Vincent J J F Busch; Henk J Schers; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Cornelia H M van den Ende Journal: JMIR Form Res Date: 2019-11-28
Authors: Prakash Jayakumar; Meredith G Moore; Kenneth A Furlough; Lauren M Uhler; John P Andrawis; Karl M Koenig; Nazan Aksan; Paul J Rathouz; Kevin J Bozic Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Aniek A O M Claassen; Henk J Schers; Vincent J J F Busch; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Frank H J van den Hoogen; Thea P M Vliet Vlieland; Cornelia H M van den Ende Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 2.796