Literature DB >> 22057819

Shared decision-making in orthopaedic surgery.

James Slover1, Jennifer Shue, Karl Koenig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The process of clinical decision-making and the patient-physician relationship continue to evolve. Increasing patient involvement in clinical decision-making is embodied in the concept of "shared decision-making" (SDM), in which the patient and physician share responsibility in the clinical decision-making process. Various patients' decision aid tools have been developed to enhance this process. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore (1) describe decision-making models; (2) discuss the different types of patients' decision aids available to practice SDM; and (3) describe the practice and early impact of SDM on clinical orthopaedic surgery.
METHODS: We performed a search of the literature using PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library. We identified studies related to shared decision-making and the use of patients' decision aids in orthopaedics. The search resulted in 113 titles, of which 21 were included with seven studies on patients' decision aid use specifically in orthopaedics.
RESULTS: Although limited studies suggest the use of patients' decision aids may enhance decision-making, conclusions about the use of these aids in orthopaedic clinical practice cannot be made and further research examining the best type, timing, and content of patients' decision aids that will lead to maximum patient involvement and knowledge gains with minimal clinical workflow interruption are needed.
CONCLUSION: In clinical practice today, patients are increasingly involved in clinical decision-making. Further research on SDM in orthopaedic surgery examining the feasibility and impact on practice, on patients' willingness and ability to actively participate in shared decision-making, and the timing and type of patients' decision aids appropriate for use is still needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22057819      PMCID: PMC3293980          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-2156-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

Review 1.  What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?

Authors:  C Charles; T Whelan; A Gafni
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

Review 2.  Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making.

Authors:  A Towle; W Godolphin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-18

3.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango).

Authors:  C Charles; A Gafni; T Whelan
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  An interactive videodisc program for low back pain patients.

Authors:  B S Spunt; R A Deyo; V M Taylor; K M Leek; H I Goldberg; A G Mulley
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  1996-12

6.  Gender differences in patient preferences may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery.

Authors:  E W Karlson; L H Daltroy; M H Liang; H E Eaton; J N Katz
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 7.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

8.  What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making?

Authors:  R B Deber; N Kraetschmer; J Irvine
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-07-08

Review 9.  Physicians in health care management: 7. The patient-physician partnership: changing roles and the desire for information.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 10.  Physicians in health care management: 8. The patient-physician partnership: decision making, problem solving and the desire to participate.

Authors:  R B Deber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  32 in total

1.  Do Upper Extremity Trauma Patients Have Different Preferences for Shared Decision-making Than Patients With Nontraumatic Conditions?

Authors:  Michiel G J S Hageman; Rajesh Reddy; Dennis J S Makarawung; Jan Paul Briet; C Niek van Dijk; David Ring
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; Seth S Leopold
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.

Authors:  Sarah E Lindsay; Aaron Alokozai; Sara L Eppler; Paige Fox; Catherine Curtin; Michael Gardner; Raffi Avedian; Ariel Palanca; Geoffrey D Abrams; Ivan Cheng; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  CORR Insights®: Patients With Limited Health Literacy Have Similar Preferences but Different Perceptions in Shared Decision-making for Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  Jorge G Boretto
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  Current concepts of shared decision making in orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Klifto; Christopher Klifto; James Slover
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

6.  Pilot Survey of Shared Decision-Making Between Orthopaedic Surgeons and Their Patients in Guatemala.

Authors:  S N Martinez-Siekavizza; S C Winter; F Barchi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Role of decision aids in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Isha A Ten Have; Michel Pj van den Bekerom; Derek Fp van Deurzen; Michel Gjs Hageman
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-12-18

8.  Preferences for Shared Decision Making in Older Adult Patients With Orthopedic Hand Conditions.

Authors:  Agnes Z Dardas; Christopher Stockburger; Sean Boone; Tonya An; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, Comparing Patients and Physicians.

Authors:  Michiel Gjs Hageman; Jeroen K Bossen; Valentin Neuhaus; Chaitanya S Mudgal; David Ring
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-04

10.  Perceived facilitators and barriers among physical therapists and orthopedic surgeons to pre-operative home-based exercise with one exercise-only in patients eligible for knee replacement: A qualitative interview study nested in the QUADX-1 trial.

Authors:  Rasmus Skov Husted; Thomas Bandholm; Michael Skovdal Rathleff; Anders Troelsen; Jeanette Kirk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.