Literature DB >> 11139312

Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres.

V Jenkins1, L Fallowfield, J Saul.   

Abstract

As part of a multi-centred study evaluating a communication skills training model for clinicians, we collected information preferences using an adaptation of Cassileth's Information Needs questionnaire from a heterogeneous sample of 2331 patients. Results showed that 87% (2027) wanted all possible information, both good and bad news and 98% (2203) preferred to know whether or not their illness was cancer. Cross tabulation of responses revealed no significant differences in information preferences for tumour site or treatment aims but did show an effect of age and sex. The few 58/440 (13.2%) patients who stated that in general they preferred to leave disclosure of details up to the doctor, tended to be older patients more than 70 years of age (chi square = 26.01, df = 2, P< 0.0001), although paradoxically they still wanted to know certain specific details. In comparison to men women preferred to know the specific name of the illness (chi square = 4.9, df = 1, P< 0.02) and what were all the possible treatments (chi square = 8.26, df = 1, P< 0.004). The results from this very large sample provide conclusive evidence that the vast majority of patients with cancer want a great deal of specific information concerning their illness and treatment. Failure to disclose such information on the grounds that significant numbers of patients prefer not to know is untenable. Copyright 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139312      PMCID: PMC2363610          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  18 in total

1.  Ageism in the medical encounter: an exploratory study of the doctor-elderly patient relationship.

Authors:  Michele G Greene; Ronald Adelman; Rita Charon; Susie Hoffman
Journal:  Lang Commun       Date:  1986

2.  No news is not good news: information preferences of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Lesley Fallowfield; Sarah Ford; Shon Lewis
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Cybermedicine. Interview by Clare Thompson.

Authors:  G Eysenbach; E R Sa; T L Diepgen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

4.  Information needs and sources of information for women with breast cancer: a follow-up study.

Authors:  K A Luker; K Beaver; S J Leinster; R G Owens
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial.

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Hall; G P Maguire; M Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-09-22

Review 6.  Effective communication skills are the key to good cancer care.

Authors:  L Fallowfield; V Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Helping health professionals involved in cancer care acquire key interviewing skills--the impact of workshops.

Authors:  P Maguire; K Booth; C Elliott; B Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Information needs of cancer patients in west Scotland: cross sectional survey of patients' views.

Authors:  C Meredith; P Symonds; L Webster; D Lamont; E Pyper; C R Gillis; L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

9.  Patients' desire for information about anaesthesia: Australian attitudes.

Authors:  D Farnill; S Inglis
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  164 in total

1.  Participation of patients in decisions about treatment for cancer.

Authors:  L Fallowfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-17

2.  Informing, communicating and sharing decisions with people who have cancer.

Authors:  A J Sowden; C Forbes; V Entwistle; I Watt
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

3.  Surrogate decision-making in Korean patients with advanced cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  June Koo Lee; Bhumsuk Keam; Ah Reum An; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Reluctance to disclose difficult diagnoses: a narrative review comparing communication by psychiatrists and oncologists.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Discussing molecular testing in oncology care: Comparing patient and physician information preferences.

Authors:  Ana P M Pinheiro; Rachel H Pocock; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Walid L Shaib; Suresh S Ramalingam; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Sabine Fischbeck; Katja Petrowski; Mirjam Renovanz; Rebecca Nesbigall; Julian Haaf; Florian Ringel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Collusion In Palliative Care.

Authors:  Khoo Siew Beng
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2006-08-31

8.  Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents.

Authors:  Sarah Scollon; Mary A Majumder; Katie Bergstrom; Tao Wang; Amy L McGuire; Jill O Robinson; Amanda M Gutierrez; Caroline H Lee; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Sharon E Plon; D Williams Parsons; Richard L Street
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-11-12

9.  Disclosure preferences regarding cancer diagnosis and prognosis: to tell or not to tell?

Authors:  H Miyata; M Takahashi; T Saito; H Tachimori; I Kai
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 10.  Unmet psychosocial needs in haematological cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  B Swash; N Hulbert-Williams; R Bramwell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.