Literature DB >> 22819379

Femoral neck fracture after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: prevalence, time to fracture, and outcome after revision.

Gulraj S Matharu1, Callum W McBryde, Matthew P Revell, Paul B Pynsent.   

Abstract

A consecutive cohort of 3076 Birmingham Hip Resurfacings from a single institution was analyzed. The prevalence of femoral neck fracture, the time to fracture, and the outcome after revision were investigated. Fractures occurred in 34 hips (prevalence, 1.1%). Median time to fracture was 0.27 year (range, 0.014-11.2 years). Mean operation time for revision was 59 minutes, and 71% underwent isolated femoral component revision. At a mean follow-up of 5.5 years since revision, 3 patients required re-revision (2 aseptic loosening, 1 for sepsis) giving a survival of 95.7% (confidence interval, 86.9%-100%) at 5 years for the revision. Median Oxford Hip Score was 12.5% (interquartile range, 3.2%-32.3%). There were no cases of radiologic failure during follow-up. Most fractures occur early after hip resurfacing and were straightforward to revise.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819379     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up.

Authors:  Md Quamar Azam; Stephen McMahon; Gabrielle Hawdon; Sukesh Rao Sankineani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  The future role of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Ronan B C Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

4.  Biomimetic Multispiked Connecting Ti-Alloy Scaffold Prototype for Entirely-Cementless Resurfacing Arthroplasty Endoprostheses-Exemplary Results of Implantation of the Ca-P Surface-Modified Scaffold Prototypes in Animal Model and Osteoblast Culture Evaluation.

Authors:  Ryszard Uklejewski; Piotr Rogala; Mariusz Winiecki; Renata Tokłowicz; Piotr Ruszkowski; Maria Wołuń-Cholewa
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  The Effect of Travel Distance on Outcomes for Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty at a High-Volume Center.

Authors:  Tony S Shen; Patawut Bovonratwet; Rachelle Morgenstern; Aaron Z Chen; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-24

6.  Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Drake G LeBrun; Tony S Shen; Patawut Bovonratwet; Rachelle Morgenstern; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-08

7.  Poor Survivorship and Frequent Complications at a Median of 10 Years After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Revision.

Authors:  Gulraj S Matharu; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.