| Literature DB >> 26828937 |
André M Almeida1,2,3, Rui G Palhinhas2, Tanya Kilminster4, Timothy Scanlon4, Sofia van Harten1, John Milton5, Dominique Blache5, Johan Greeff4, Chris Oldham4, Ana Varela Coelho2, Luís Alfaro Cardoso1.
Abstract
Seasonal Weight Loss (SWL) is an important constraint, limiting animal production in the Tropics and the Mediterranean. As a result, the study of physiological and biochemical mechanisms by which domestic animal breeds respond to SWL is important to those interested in animal breeding and the improvement thereof. To that end, the study of the proteome has been instrumental in gathering important information on physiological mechanisms, including those underlying SWL. In spite of that, little information is available concerning physiological mechanisms of SWL in production animals. The objective of this study was to determine differential protein expression in the muscle of three different breeds of sheep, the Australian Merino, the Dorper and the Damara, each showing different levels of tolerance to weight loss (low, medium and high, respectively). Per breed, two experimental groups were established, one labeled "Growth" and the other labeled "Restricted." After forty-two days of dietary treatment, all animals were euthanized. Muscle samples were then taken. Total protein was extracted from the muscle, then quantified and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis were conducted using 24 cm pH 3-10 immobiline dry strips and colloidal coomassie staining. Gels were analyzed using Samespots® software and spots of interest were in-gel digested with trypsin. The isolated proteins were identified using MALDI-TOF/TOF. Results indicated relevant differences between breeds; several proteins are suggested as putative biomarkers of tolerance to weight loss: Desmin, Troponin T, Phosphoglucomutase and the Histidine Triad nucleotide-binding protein 1. This information is of relevance to and of possible use in selection programs aiming towards ruminant animal production in regions prone to droughts and weight loss.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26828937 PMCID: PMC4734549 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Live weight changes (kg ± standard deviation) for Damara, Dorper and Merino breeds assigned to either a restricted or growth diet.
| Restricted Feeding Diet | Growth diet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | Merino | Damara | Dorper | Merino | Damara | Dorper |
| 0 | 32.90±4.9 | 42.00±7.0 | 37.90±6.0 | 34.20±4.4 | 43.10±7.4 | 39.50±7.9 |
| 42 | 28.60±3.1 | 37.30±5.3 | 34.30±5.6 | 37.70±4.5 | 46.00±5.6 | 45.00±7.5 |
| Decrease / Increase | -14% | -12% | -12% | +10% | +7% | +13% |
Significant differences (P<0.05) were found for all experimental groups in a comparison of day 42 and day 0 and between the two groups of the same breed at day 42. Table adapted from [24]
Plasma concentrations of leptin and insulin (mean (s.e.)) in three breeds of sheep fed a diet maintaining or restricting growth.
| Merino | Damara | Dorper | Significance level | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day | Growth | Restricted | Growth | Restricted | Growth | Restricted | Breed | Diet | BxD | |
| Leptin (ng/ml) | 0 | 0.501 (0.015) | 0.541 (0.018) | 0.773 (0.084) | 0.810 (0.088) | 0.547 (0.032) | 0.533 (0.023) | NS | NS | |
| 21 | 0.953 (0.046) | 0.706 (0.067) | 1.208 (0.134) | 0.919 (0.084) | 1.118 (0.090) | 0.698 (0.040) | NS | |||
| 42 | 0.883 (0.057) | 0.638 (0.049) | 1.084 (0.126) | 0.873 (0.104) | 0.951 (0.055) | 0.627 (0.048) | NS | |||
| Insulin (μU/ml) | 0 | 3.671 (0.469) | 2.703 (0.271) | 7.632 (1.259) | 5.828 (0.981) | 3.463 (0.580) | 2.815 (0.278) | NS | NS | |
| 21 | 4.636 (0.453) | 3.049 (0.275) | 7.552 (0.977) | 4.938 (0.576) | 5.014 (0.430) | 3.221 (0.309) | NS | |||
| 42 | 4.223 (0.470) | 2.322 (0.232) | 6.938 (0.821) | 3.958 (0.468) | 4.318 (0.348) | 2.067 (0.111) | NS | |||
Trial duration– 42 days; n = 72; Restricted feeding level– 85% of maintenance. Data is shown as averages. (1)—Da≠ M; Da≠Do; M = Do; (2)—D≠M; Da = Do; M = Do;
*—p<0.05
***—p<0.001.
NS = Non significant; BxD—Interaction effect of breed and diet
Fig 1Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Examples of 2D gels obtained for the muscle tissue of Merino, Damara and Dorper rams. Molecular mass markers (MM, vertical scale), as well as isoelectric point (horizontal scale) are also presented. Two-Dimensional electrophoresis was carried out in linear 24cm Immobiline dry strips (pH 3–10). Six hundred micrograms of protein were loaded per gel. Staining was performed with Colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250.
Fig 2Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis.
Example of a 2D gel for a merino ram gastrocnemius muscle, showing the spots that were selected for identification. Molecular mass markers (MM, vertical scale), as well as the isoelectric point (pI, horizontal scale are also presented. Two-dimensional electrophoresis was carried out in linear 24 cm Immobiline DryStrips (pH 3–10). Gels were stained with colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250.
Protein spots showing differential expression in at least 2 experimental groups (p<0.05).
| Spot reference | Protein name | Merino | Damara | Dorper | Accession Number | Matched Peptides | Sequence Coverage (%) | Protein Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | Restricted | Growth | Restricted | Growth | Restricted | MS | MS/ MS | |||||
| 834 | Phosphoglucomutase -1 | 1.579e+004 | 1.968e+004 | 1.038e+004 | 1.143e+004 | 1.586e+004 | 1.526e+004 | PGM1_BOVIN | 16 | 1 | 30 | 286 |
| 904 | T complex protein 1 subunit theta | 1.530e+004 | 1.858e+004 | 1.348e+004 | 1.132e+004 | 1.211e+004 | 0.972e+004 | TCPQ_BOVIN | 7 | 1 | 14 | 92 |
| 1065 | Desmin | 10,70e+004 | 10.34e+004 | 6.370e+004 | 9.448e+004 | 8.330e+004 | 5.314e+004 | DESM_BOVIN | 23 | 10 | 53 | 688 |
| 1136 | Cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 1, mitochondrial | 5.213e+004 | 5.170e+004 | 6.425e+004 | 4.590e+004 | 3.931e+004 | 3.473e+004 | QCR1_BOVIN | 14 | 7 | 34 | 452 |
| 1195 | Actin, alpha skeletal muscle | 1.092e+004 | 1.226e+004 | 2.171e+004 | 2.376e+004 | 2.449e+004 | 1.598e+004 | ACTS_BOVIN | 6 | 1 | 23 | 154 |
| 1259 | Actin, alpha skeletal muscle | 8.763e+005 | 12.20e+005 | 9.940e+005 | 12.32e+005 | 7.631e+005 | 9.543e+005 | ACTS_BOVIN | 11 | 8 | 42 | 419 |
| 1272 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 3.807e+004 | 1.891e+004 | 4.608e+004 | 3.711e+004 | 3.159e+004 | 2.867e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 7 | 3 | 23 | 262 |
| 1277 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 1.720e+004 | 1.210e+004 | 2.170e+004 | 1.704e+004 | 1.409e+004 | 1.793e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 3 | 1 | 14 | 72 |
| 1290 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 9.358e+004 | 4.829e+004 | 11.71e+004 | 8.938e+004 | 7.157e+004 | 6.769e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 7 | 3 | 24 | 262 |
| 1291 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 2.346e+004 | 1.533e+004 | 2.453e+004 | 1.981e+004 | 2.954e+004 | 3.049e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 7 | 1 | 21 | 183 |
| 1292 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 3.679e+004 | 2.714e+004 | 5.420e+004 | 4.380e+004 | 4.052e+004 | 4.609e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 8 | 1 | 24 | 173 |
| 1294 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 5.089e+004 | 3.553e+004 | 5.338e+004 | 3.372e+004 | 6.681e+004 | 6.491e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 6 | 1 | 21 | 196 |
| 1295 | Troponin T, fast skeletal muscle | 5.142e+004 | 3.255e+004 | 6.358e+004 | 4.785e+004 | 5.329e+004 | 5.663e+004 | TNNT3_BOVIN | 3 | 1 | 11 | 61 |
| 1844 | Myosin light chain 1/3, skeletal muscle isoform | 3.380e+005 | 4.402e+005 | 2.885e+005 | 4.771e+005 | 2.867e+005 | 3.347e+005 | MYL1_BOVIN | 8 | 5 | 50 | 582 |
| 2640 | Histidine Triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 | 2.143e+004 | 2.110e+004 | 1.471e+004 | 1.228e+004 | 2.618e+004 | 1.957e+004 | HINT1_BOVIN | 1 | 1 | 11 | 87 |
| 2791 | Hemoglobin subunit beta | 0.570e+005 | 1.294e+005 | 1.063e+005 | 0.969e+005 | 1.538e+005 | 1.695e+005 | HBB_SHEEP | 8 | 4 | 77 | 467 |
aNumber of peptides, matching the identified protein, whose sequence differs in at least one amino acid residue;
bPercentage of the identified protein sequence covered by the matched peptide
cIdentification Score obtained with the Mowse algorithm. A result is considered to be significant when a score above 61 is attained.