Anne N Thorndike1, Jason Riis2, Douglas E Levy3. 1. General Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States. Electronic address: athorndike@partners.org. 2. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, United States. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Population-level strategies to improve healthy food choices are needed for obesity prevention. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 2672 employees at the Massachusetts General Hospital who were regular customers of the hospital cafeteria with all items labeled green (healthy), yellow (less healthy), or red (unhealthy) to determine if social norm (peer-comparison) feedback with or without financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices. METHODS: Participants were randomized in 2012 to three arms: 1) monthly letter with social norm feedback about healthy food purchases, comparing employee to "all" and to "healthiest" customers (feedback-only); 2) monthly letter with social norm feedback plus small financial incentive for increasing green purchases (feedback-incentive); or 3) no contact (control). The main outcome was change in proportion of green-labeled purchases at the end of 3-month intervention. Post-hoc analyses examined linear trends. RESULTS: At baseline, the proportion of green-labeled purchases (50%) did not differ between arms. At the end of the 3-month intervention, the percentage increase in green-labeled purchases was larger in the feedback-incentive arm compared to control (2.2% vs. 0.1%, P=0.03), but the two intervention arms were not different. The rate of increase in green-labeled purchases was higher in both feedback-only (P=0.04) and feedback-incentive arms (P=0.004) compared to control. At the end of a 3-month wash-out, there were no differences between control and intervention arms. CONCLUSIONS: Social norms plus small financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices over the short-term. Future research will be needed to assess the impact of this relatively low-cost intervention on employees' food choices and weight over the long-term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01604499.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Population-level strategies to improve healthy food choices are needed for obesity prevention. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of 2672 employees at the Massachusetts General Hospital who were regular customers of the hospital cafeteria with all items labeled green (healthy), yellow (less healthy), or red (unhealthy) to determine if social norm (peer-comparison) feedback with or without financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices. METHODS:Participants were randomized in 2012 to three arms: 1) monthly letter with social norm feedback about healthy food purchases, comparing employee to "all" and to "healthiest" customers (feedback-only); 2) monthly letter with social norm feedback plus small financial incentive for increasing green purchases (feedback-incentive); or 3) no contact (control). The main outcome was change in proportion of green-labeled purchases at the end of 3-month intervention. Post-hoc analyses examined linear trends. RESULTS: At baseline, the proportion of green-labeled purchases (50%) did not differ between arms. At the end of the 3-month intervention, the percentage increase in green-labeled purchases was larger in the feedback-incentive arm compared to control (2.2% vs. 0.1%, P=0.03), but the two intervention arms were not different. The rate of increase in green-labeled purchases was higher in both feedback-only (P=0.04) and feedback-incentive arms (P=0.004) compared to control. At the end of a 3-month wash-out, there were no differences between control and intervention arms. CONCLUSIONS: Social norms plus small financial incentives increased employees' healthy food choices over the short-term. Future research will be needed to assess the impact of this relatively low-cost intervention on employees' food choices and weight over the long-term. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01604499.
Authors: Leonard H Epstein; Noelle Jankowiak; Chantal Nederkoorn; Hollie A Raynor; Simone A French; Eric Finkelstein Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sarah MacCarthy; Alexandra Mendoza-Graf; Uzaib Saya; Clare Samba; Josephine Birungi; Stephen Okoboi; Sebastian Linnemayr Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: Douglas E Levy; Emily D Gelsomin; Eric B Rimm; Mark Pachucki; Jenny Sanford; Emma Anderson; Charles Johnson; Rose Schutzberg; Anne N Thorndike Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-11-07 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Rebecca L Franckle; Douglas E Levy; Lorena Macias-Navarro; Eric B Rimm; Anne N Thorndike Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Jenny Jia; Douglas E Levy; Jessica L McCurley; Emma Anderson; Emily D Gelsomin; Bianca Porneala; Anne N Thorndike Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Peter von Philipsborn; Jan M Stratil; Jacob Burns; Laura K Busert; Lisa M Pfadenhauer; Stephanie Polus; Christina Holzapfel; Hans Hauner; Eva Rehfuess Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-06-12
Authors: Jason M Thomas; Amanda Ursell; Eric L Robinson; Paul Aveyard; Susan A Jebb; C Peter Herman; Suzanne Higgs Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Anne N Thorndike; Jessica L McCurley; Emily D Gelsomin; Emma Anderson; Yuchiao Chang; Bianca Porneala; Charles Johnson; Eric B Rimm; Douglas E Levy Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2021-06-01