Literature DB >> 8880389

Pediatric drug development: a perspective from the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

M Smith1, P T Ho.   

Abstract

Well-designed and carefully conducted pediatric phase 1 trials are critical to the process of evaluating new agents for potential benefit in children with cancer, and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has for a number of years sponsored pediatric phase I trials. The development of new agents for children with cancer differs in important ways from drug development for adults with cancer, primarily necessitated by the smaller number of children eligible for phase I trials in comparison to adults. Pediatric drug development is characterized by a greater need to prioritize new agents for evaluation, since many more agents can be evaluated in adults than can be evaluated in children. Pediatric phase I trials are also commonly conducted as multi-institutional collaborations, since most single institutions do not have enough eligible patients to complete phase I trials within a reasonable time. In addition, pediatric phase I trials begin at doses close to the adult maximum tolerated dose, thereby minimizing the number of patients required to complete pediatric phase I trials. While pediatric phase I trials have traditionally evaluated conventional cytotoxic agents, new classes of agents with distinctive mechanisms of action are entering clinical evaluation. These agents target specific cellular proteins (e.g., protein tyrosine kinases, protein kinase C isoforms, enzymes involved in controlling progression through the cell cycle). Determining whether these agents with specificity for critical cellular proteins will be effective anti-cancer agents will be an important objective of pediatric clinical investigations in the coming years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880389     DOI: 10.1007/bf00173678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  57 in total

1.  Phase I evaluation of all-trans-retinoic acid in adults with solid tumors.

Authors:  J S Lee; R A Newman; S M Lippman; M H Huber; T Minor; M N Raber; I H Krakoff; W K Hong
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Studies on the differentiation inducers of myeloid leukemic cells. III. Spicamycin, a new inducer of differentiation of HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Y Hayakawa; M Nakagawa; H Kawai; K Tanabe; H Nakayama; A Shimazu; H Seto; N Otake
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Activity of 9-dimethylaminomethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin against pediatric and adult central nervous system tumor xenografts.

Authors:  H S Friedman; P J Houghton; S C Schold; S Keir; D D Bigner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Phase I study of bryostatin 1: assessment of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha induction in vivo. The Cancer Research Campaign Phase I Committee.

Authors:  P A Philip; D Rea; P Thavasu; J Carmichael; N S Stuart; H Rockett; D C Talbot; T Ganesan; G R Pettit; F Balkwill
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase activity by leflunomide.

Authors:  T Mattar; K Kochhar; R Bartlett; E G Bremer; A Finnegan
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 4.124

6.  Relation of preclinical toxicology to findings in early clinical trials.

Authors:  C K Grieshaber; S Marsoni
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1986-01

7.  Farnesyltransferase inhibitors are inhibitors of Ras but not R-Ras2/TC21, transformation.

Authors:  J M Carboni; N Yan; A D Cox; X Bustelo; S M Graham; M J Lynch; R Weinmann; B R Seizinger; C J Der; M Barbacid
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1995-05-18       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Inhibition of microtubules and cell cycle arrest by a new 1-deaza-7,8-dihydropteridine antitumor drug, CI 980, and by its chiral isomer, NSC 613863.

Authors:  C de Ines; D Leynadier; I Barasoain; V Peyrot; P Garcia; C Briand; G A Rener; C Temple
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Biotherapy for xenografted human central nervous system leukemia in mice with severe combined immunodeficiency using B43 (anti-CD19)-pokeweed antiviral protein immunotoxin.

Authors:  R Gunther; L M Chelstrom; L Tuel-Ahlgren; J Simon; D E Myers; F M Uckun
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Inhibition of proliferation and induction of differentiation in medulloblastoma- and astrocytoma-derived cell lines with phenylacetate.

Authors:  G Stockhammer; G T Manley; R Johnson; M K Rosenblum; D Samid; F S Lieberman
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  5 in total

1.  Balancing safety, effectiveness, and public desire: the FDA and cancer.

Authors:  Rena Conti
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2003-04

2.  Understanding clinical trials in childhood cancer.

Authors:  Mason C Bond; Sheila Pritchard
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 3.  Factors in improved survival from paediatric cancer.

Authors:  J W Taub
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Phase I study of temozolomide combined with oral etoposide in children with malignant glial tumors.

Authors:  Antonio Ruggiero; Daniela Rizzo; Giorgio Attinà; Ilaria Lazzareschi; Palma Maurizi; Vita Ridola; Stefano Mastrangelo; Roberta Migliorati; Patrizia Bertolini; Cesare Colosimo; Riccardo Riccardi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Innovations for phase I dose-finding designs in pediatric oncology clinical trials.

Authors:  Adelaide Doussau; Birgit Geoerger; Irene Jiménez; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.