| Literature DB >> 26824471 |
Nghi Ngoc Tran1,2, Tai The Pham3, Kyoko Ozawa4, Muneko Nishijo1, Anh Thi Nguyet Nguyen2, Tuong Quy Tran2, Luong Van Hoang3, Anh Hai Tran3, Vu Huy Anh Phan5, Akio Nakai6, Yoshikazu Nishino1, Hisao Nishijo4.
Abstract
Dioxin concentrations remain elevated in the environment and in humans residing near former US Air Force bases in South Vietnam. Our previous epidemiological studies showed adverse effects of dioxin exposure on neurodevelopment for the first 3 years of life. Subsequently, we extended the follow-up period and investigated the influence of perinatal dioxin exposure on neurodevelopment, including motor coordination and higher cognitive ability, in preschool children. Presently, we investigated 176 children in a hot spot of dioxin contamination who were followed up from birth until 5 years old. Perinatal dioxin exposure levels were estimated by measuring dioxin levels in maternal breast milk. Dioxin toxicity was evaluated using two indices; toxic equivalent (TEQ)-polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/furans (PCDDs/Fs) and concentration of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Coordinated movements, including manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance, were assessed using the Movement Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (Movement ABC-2). Cognitive ability was assessed using the nonverbal index (NVI) of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (KABC-II). In boys, total test and balance scores of Movement ABC-2 were significantly lower in the high TEQ- PCDDs/Fs group compared with the moderate and low exposure groups. NVI scores and the pattern reasoning subscale of the KABC-II indicating planning ability were also significantly lower in the high TCDD exposure group compared with the low exposure group of boys. However, in girls, no significant differences in Movement ABC-2 and KABC-II scores were found among the different TEQ-PCDDs/Fs and TCDD exposure groups. Furthermore, in high risk cases, five boys and one girl highly exposed to TEQ-PCDDs/Fs and TCDD had double the risk for difficulties in both neurodevelopmental skills. These results suggest differential impacts of TEQ-PCDDs/Fs and TCDD exposure on motor coordination and higher cognitive ability, respectively. Moreover, high TEQ-PCDDs/Fs exposure combined with high TCDD exposure may increase autistic traits combined with developmental coordination disorder.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26824471 PMCID: PMC4732982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of subjects in three groups with different exposure levels of TEQ-PCDDs/Fs in breast milk.
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs groups | Low | Middle | High | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | P-value | |
| Boys | Number of subjects | 39 | 39 | 25 | ||||
| Maternal age | 26.3 | 4.3 | 27.9 | 6.5 | 30.9 | 5.7 | ||
| Maternal education (years) | 9.4 | 2.5 | 8.6 | 3.6 | 8.2 | 4.0 | ||
| Family income (VNDsx103/month) | 3012 | 1620 | 3167 | 1462 | 2733 | 1420 | ||
| Parity (primiparae rate (%)) | 15.4 | 34.2 | 29.2 | |||||
| Child age (months) | 62.3 | 1.6 | 62.2 | 1.7 | 61.7 | 1.8 | ||
| Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 39.7 | 0.9 | 39.5 | 0.6 | 39.7 | 0.7 | ||
| Birthweight (g) | 3335 | 357 | 3220 | 384 | 3241 | 460 | ||
| Weight (kg) at the survey | 20.2 | 3.8 | 20.1 | 4.0 | 19.3 | 4.8 | ||
| Height (cm) at the survey | 109.1 | 3.5 | 109.4 | 4.4 | 103.7 | 19.6 | ||
| Head circum (cm) at the survey | 50.9 | 1.4 | 50.7 | 1.1 | 50.7 | 1.8 | ||
| Abdominal circum (cm) at the survey | 55.2 | 6.0 | 55.3 | 6.7 | 54.1 | 6.5 | ||
| BMI at the survey | 16.9 | 2.4 | 16.7 | 2.5 | 16.4 | 2.8 | ||
| TCDD (pg/g lipid) | 0.86 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.5 | ||
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs (pg-TEQ/g lipid) | 8.3 | 1.3 | 13.9 | 1.1 | 21.1 | 1.2 | ||
| Girls | Number of subjects | 26 | 26 | 26 | ||||
| Maternal age | 27.0 | 5.2 | 27.9 | 6.4 | 31.0 | 6.6 | ||
| Maternal education (years) | 8.0 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 4.2 | 8.3 | 3.2 | ||
| Family income (VNDsx103/month) | 2965 | 1745 | 2759 | 1294 | 2907 | 1822 | ||
| Parity (primiparae rate (%)) | 23.1 | 34.8 | 22.2 | |||||
| Child age (months) | 61.8 | 1.9 | 62.0 | 1.8 | 61.7 | 1.7 | ||
| Gestational age at birth (weeks) | 39.7 | 0.7 | 39.4 | 0.8 | 39.5 | 0.9 | ||
| Birthweight (g) | 3125 | 368 | 3096 | 350 | 3322 | 351 | ||
| Weight (kg) at the survey | 17.5 | 3.5 | 19.5 | 4.5 | 18.4 | 3.5 | ||
| Height (cm) at the survey | 107.7 | 4.6 | 109.6 | 4.4 | 106.8 | 3.9 | ||
| Head circum (cm) at the survey | 49.5 | 1.5 | 50.0 | 1.5 | 49.6 | 1.7 | ||
| Abdominal circum (cm) at the survey | 51.6 | 5.2 | 54.4 | 7.5 | 53.3 | 6.4 | ||
| BMI at the survey | 15.0 | 2.2 | 16.1 | 2.9 | 16.0 | 2.3 | ||
| TCDD (pg/g lipid) | 0.62 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 1.9 | 3.3 | 1.7 | ||
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs (pg-TEQ/g lipid) | 7.2 | 1.4 | 14.4 | 1.1 | 22.6 | 1.3 | ||
High TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: TEQ-PCDDs/Fs ≥ 17.6pg-TEQ/g lipid, Moderate TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: 11.5–17.6, Low TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: <11.5
SD: standard deviation, VND: Vietnam Dong, Head circum: Head circumference, Abdominal circum: Abdominal circumference
Mean and SD of dioxin concentrations are geometric ones.
**: P<0.01: compared with low TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group
Comparisons of adjusted Movement ABC-2 scores among the three TEQ-PCDDs/Fs exposure groups.
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs groups | Low | Moderate | High | Group cpmparison | ANOVA | Effect size | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Scales | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | High-Low | High-Mod | P-val | |
| Boys | Number of subjects | 39 | 38 | 24 | |||||||
| Total test score (TOTAL) | 9.7 | 0.4 | 9.8 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 0.5 | 0.018 | 0.107 | |||
| Total manual dexterity (MD) | 10.1 | 0.5 | 10.8 | 0.5 | 9.5 | 0.6 | 0.262 | 0.033 | |||
| Posting coins (MD1) | 8.8 | 0.4 | 8.8 | 0.4 | 7.7 | 0.5 | 0.198 | 0.040 | |||
| Threading beads (MD2) | 9.8 | 0.5 | 11.7 | 0.5 | 10.0 | 0.6 | 0.031 | 0.074 | |||
| Drawing trail (MD3) | 10.2 | 0.4 | 10.2 | 0.4 | 10.1 | 0.5 | 0.981 | 0.003 | |||
| Total aiming & catching (A&C) | 9.9 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 0.4 | 9.7 | 0.5 | 0.712 | 0.012 | |||
| Catching beanbag (A&C1) | 9.8 | 0.3 | 9.6 | 0.3 | 9.9 | 0.4 | 0.819 | 0.006 | |||
| Throwing beanbag (A&C2) | 9.5 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 0.5 | 8.9 | 0.6 | 0.679 | 0.011 | |||
| Total balance (BAL) | 9.3 | 0.4 | 9.2 | 0.4 | 7.3 | 0.5 | 0.013 | 0.094 | |||
| One-leg balance (BAL1) | 9.5 | 0.4 | 9.0 | 0.4 | 8.5 | 0.5 | 0.419 | 0.041 | |||
| Walking heels raised (BAL2) | 7.7 | 0.4 | 8.0 | 0.4 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.112 | 0.037 | |||
| Jumping on mats (BAL3) | 11.0 | 0.4 | 11.6 | 0.4 | 9.5 | 0.5 | 0.010 | 0.085 | |||
| Girls | Number of subjects | 26 | 23 | 26 | |||||||
| Total test score (TOTAL) | 10.1 | 0.5 | 9.9 | 0.5 | 9.9 | 0.5 | 0.959 | 0.002 | |||
| Total manual dexterity (MD) | 10.2 | 0.5 | 10.4 | 0.5 | 10.5 | 0.5 | 0.935 | 0.006 | |||
| Posting coins (MD1) | 8.0 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 0.6 | 0.646 | 0.022 | |||
| Threading beads (MD2) | 11.1 | 0.6 | 11.1 | 0.6 | 10.8 | 0.6 | 0.923 | 0.001 | |||
| Drawing trail (MD3) | 10.7 | 0.4 | 9.7 | 0.4 | 10.9 | 0.4 | 0.140 | 0.058 | |||
| Total aiming & catching (A&C) | 9.5 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 0.4 | 9.7 | 0.4 | 0.835 | 0.004 | |||
| Catching beanbag (A&C1) | 10.1 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 0.4 | 9.4 | 0.4 | 0.324 | 0.042 | |||
| Throwing beanbag (A&C2) | 8.2 | 0.6 | 8.8 | 0.6 | 9.5 | 0.6 | 0.330 | 0.025 | |||
| Total balance (BAL) | 10.7 | 0.7 | 10.7 | 0.7 | 10.0 | 0.7 | 0.738 | 0.020 | |||
| One-leg balance (BAL1) | 9.4 | 0.5 | 9.1 | 0.5 | 9.9 | 0.5 | 0.550 | 0.021 | |||
| Walking heels raised (BAL2) | 9.2 | 0.7 | 8.6 | 0.7 | 9.2 | 0.7 | 0.775 | 0.010 | |||
| Jumping on mats (BAL3) | 11.2 | 0.4 | 11.8 | 0.4 | 11.3 | 0.4 | 0.528 | 0.025 | |||
High TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: TEQ-PCDDs/Fs ≥ 17.6pg-TEQ/g lipid, Moderate TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: 11.5–17.6, Low TEQ-PCDDs/Fs group: <11.5
MD1-3: Subscales of MD, A&C1-2:Subscales of A&C, BAL1-3; Subscales of BAL
ANOVA P-value: compared by General Linear Model after adjustment for month-age, gestational age, birth weight of infant, family income, parents' education years.
*: P<0.05,
**: P<0.01 comparison between high and low TEQ-PCDDs/Fs groups,
#: P<0.05,
##: P<0.01 comparisons between high and moderate TEQ-PCDDs/Fs groups
Comparisons of adjusted KABC-II scores among the three TCDD exposure groups.
| TCDD groups | Low | Moderate | High | Comparison | ANOVA | Effect size | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Gender | Scales | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | High-Low | P-val | |
| All age | Boys | Number of subjects | 85 | 11 | 7 | ||||||
| NVI | 91.8 | 1.6 | 83.8 | 4.5 | 77.0 | 6.2 | 0.034 | 0.076 | |||
| Seq/ | 102.7 | 1.8 | 109.0 | 5.1 | 103.1 | 7.0 | 0.515 | 0.014 | |||
| Sim/ | 96.4 | 2.2 | 84.6 | 6.3 | 86.6 | 8.6 | 0.163 | 0.037 | |||
| Girls | Number of subjects | 57 | 10 | 11 | |||||||
| NVI | 94.7 | 2.1 | 94.7 | 5.1 | 98.1 | 5.0 | 0.818 | 0.006 | |||
| Seq/ | 109.5 | 2.2 | 106.2 | 5.3 | 105.6 | 5.2 | 0.739 | 0.008 | |||
| Sim/ | 94.0 | 2.4 | 92.6 | 5.7 | 99.2 | 5.6 | 0.647 | 0.008 | |||
| 5-year-olds | Boys | Number of subjects | 74 | 10 | 6 | ||||||
| NVI | 89.7 | 1.6 | 81.4 | 4.4 | 74.0 | 6.4 | 0.024 | 0.093 | |||
| Seq/ | 102.5 | 1.9 | 107.6 | 5.2 | 101.5 | 7.3 | 0.634 | 0.010 | |||
| Sim/ | 94.9 | 2.3 | 92.1 | 6.4 | 85.8 | 9.0 | 0.151 | 0.043 | |||
| Girls | Number of subjects | 47 | 10 | 11 | |||||||
| NVI | 94.3 | 2.4 | 93.5 | 5.3 | 96.7 | 5.2 | 0.892 | 0.004 | |||
| Seq/ | 108.9 | 2.6 | 107.3 | 5.7 | 108.5 | 5.4 | 0.969 | 0.003 | |||
| Sim/ | 92.1 | 2.7 | 93.3 | 6.0 | 101.0 | 5.7 | 0.392 | 0.018 | |||
High TCDD group: TCDD ≥ 3.5 pg/g lipid, Moderate TCDD group: 2.5–3.5, Low TCDD group: < 2.5,
SE: standard error, N: number of subjects, NVI: Non Verbal Index,
Seq/Gsm: Sequence/General ability of short term memory, Sim/Gv: Simultaneous/General ability of visual processing
ANOVA P-value: compared by General Linear Model after adjustment for month-age, gestational age, birth weight of infant, maternal age, family income, parents' education years.
*: P<0.05: compared with low TCDD group
Comparisons of adjusted KABC-II scores between high and low TCDD exposure groups in 5-year-olds.
| Low | High | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (pg/g lipid) | TCDD < 2.5 | TCDD ≥ 2.5 | |||||
| Gender | Scales | Mean | SE | Mean | SE | P-value | Effect size |
| Boys | Number of subjects | 74 | 16 | ||||
| NVI | 90.1 | 1.6 | 78.9 | 3.8 | 0.010 | 0.083 | |
| Seq/ | 102.5 | 1.9 | 105.8 | 4.3 | 0.508 | 0.006 | |
| Sim/ | 86.6 | 1.7 | 78.3 | 3.9 | 0.065 | 0.043 | |
| Sub 1: Conceptual Thinking | 6.8 | 0.32 | 5.8 | 0.74 | 0.244 | 0.017 | |
| Sub 2: Face Recognition | 8.8 | 0.27 | 7.6 | 0.63 | 0.099 | 0.035 | |
| Sub 3: Triangles | 10.0 | 0.35 | 9.3 | 0.81 | 0.434 | 0.008 | |
| Sub 4: Pattern Reasoning | 7.1 | 0.33 | 5.3 | 0.79 | 0.041 | 0.052 | |
| Sub 5: Hand Movements | 9.9 | 0.23 | 9.2 | 0.53 | 0.255 | 0.017 | |
| Sub 6: Number Recall | 11.4 | 0.37 | 11.8 | 0.85 | 0.678 | 0.002 | |
| Sub 7: Word Order | 9.3 | 0.35 | 10.0 | 0.81 | 0.476 | 0.007 | |
| Girls | Number of subjects | 47 | 21 | ||||
| NVI | 94.3 | 2.4 | 95.3 | 3.8 | 0.839 | 0.001 | |
| Seq/ | 109.3 | 2.5 | 107.5 | 4.0 | 0.721 | 0.002 | |
| Sim/ | 88.6 | 2.5 | 92.6 | 3.9 | 0.420 | 0.012 | |
| Sub 1: Conceptual Thinking | 6.8 | 0.46 | 7.4 | 0.73 | 0.521 | 0.007 | |
| Sub 2: Face Recognition | 9.4 | 0.44 | 10.6 | 0.69 | 0.191 | 0.003 | |
| Sub 3: Triangles | 10.8 | 0.41 | 10.5 | 0.65 | 0.639 | 0.004 | |
| Sub 4: Pattern Reasoning | 7.1 | 0.53 | 8.7 | 0.85 | 0.132 | 0.040 | |
| Sub 5: Hand Movements | 10.4 | 0.36 | 9.2 | 0.58 | 0.117 | 0.043 | |
| Sub 6: Number Recall | 13.0 | 0.48 | 13.2 | 0.76 | 0.872 | 0.000 | |
| Sub 7: Word Order | 10.1 | 0.49 | 9.3 | 0.78 | 0.428 | 0.011 | |
SE: standard error, Sub: subscale, NVI = Sub 1–5, Seq/Gsm = Sub 6+7, Sim/Gv = Sub 1+2+4
P-value: compared by General Linear Model after adjustment for month-age, gestational age, birth weight of infant, maternal age, family income, parents' education years
Children at risk for having difficulties in motor coordination and/or cognitive ability.
| Number of risk | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Dioxin levels | N (%) | N(%) | N(%) |
| Boys | Number of subjects | 71 | 25 | 5 |
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs ≥ 17.6 (pg-TEQ/g lipid) | 10 (14.1) | 6 (24.0) | 5 (100.0) | |
| TCDD ≥2.5 (pg/g lipid) | 10 (14.1) | 3 (12.0) | 4 (80.0) | |
| Girls | Number of subjects | 63 | 12 | 1 |
| TEQ-PCDDs/Fs ≥ 17.6 (pg-TEQ/g lipid) | 22 (34.9) | 1 (8.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| TCDD ≥2.5 (pg/g lipid) | 17 (27.0) | 3 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) |
N: number of children