Judy S LaKind1,2, Geniece M Lehmann3, Matthew H Davis4, Erin P Hines3, Satori A Marchitti5, Cecilia Alcala6, Matthew Lorber7. 1. 1 LaKind Associates, LLC, Catonsville, Maryland, USA. 2. 2 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, Maryland, USA. 3. 3 Office of Research and Development (ORD), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Research Triangle Park , North Carolina, USA. 4. 4 Office of Children's Health Protection, U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 5. 5 Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), ORD, U.S. EPA, Athens, Georgia, USA. 6. 6 Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH), ORD, U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 7. 7 ORD, U.S. EPA, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The benefits of breastfeeding to the infant and mother have been well documented. It is also well known that breast milk contains environmental chemicals, and numerous epidemiological studies have explored relationships between background levels of chemicals in breast milk and health outcomes in infants and children. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we examine epidemiological literature to address the following question: Are infant exposures to background levels of environmental chemicals in breast milk and formula associated with adverse health effects? We critically review this literature a) to explore whether exposure-outcome associations are observed across studies, and b) to assess the literature quality. METHODS: We reviewed literature identified from electronic literature searches. We explored whether exposure-outcome associations are observed across studies by assessing the quality (using a modified version of a previously published quality assessment tool), consistency, and strengths and weaknesses in the literature. The epidemiological literature included cohorts from several countries and examined infants/children either once or multiple times over weeks to years. Health outcomes included four broad categories: growth and maturation, morbidity, biomarkers, and neurodevelopment. RESULTS: The available literature does not provide conclusive evidence of consistent or clinically relevant health consequences to infants exposed to environmental chemicals in breast milk at background levels. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that more research would better inform our understanding of the potential for health impacts from infant dietary exposures to environmental chemicals. A critical data gap is a lack of research on environmental chemicals in formula and infant/child health outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1954.
BACKGROUND: The benefits of breastfeeding to the infant and mother have been well documented. It is also well known that breast milk contains environmental chemicals, and numerous epidemiological studies have explored relationships between background levels of chemicals in breast milk and health outcomes in infants and children. OBJECTIVES: In this paper, we examine epidemiological literature to address the following question: Are infant exposures to background levels of environmental chemicals in breast milk and formula associated with adverse health effects? We critically review this literature a) to explore whether exposure-outcome associations are observed across studies, and b) to assess the literature quality. METHODS: We reviewed literature identified from electronic literature searches. We explored whether exposure-outcome associations are observed across studies by assessing the quality (using a modified version of a previously published quality assessment tool), consistency, and strengths and weaknesses in the literature. The epidemiological literature included cohorts from several countries and examined infants/children either once or multiple times over weeks to years. Health outcomes included four broad categories: growth and maturation, morbidity, biomarkers, and neurodevelopment. RESULTS: The available literature does not provide conclusive evidence of consistent or clinically relevant health consequences to infants exposed to environmental chemicals in breast milk at background levels. CONCLUSIONS: It is clear that more research would better inform our understanding of the potential for health impacts from infant dietary exposures to environmental chemicals. A critical data gap is a lack of research on environmental chemicals in formula and infant/child health outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP1954.
Authors: G Winneke; A Bucholski; B Heinzow; U Krämer; E Schmidt; J Walkowiak; J A Wiener; H J Steingrüber Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 1998-12-28 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: N Weisglas-Kuperus; S Patandin; G A Berbers; T C Sas; P G Mulder; P J Sauer; H Hooijkaas Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kellie O Casavale; Jaspreet K C Ahuja; Xianli Wu; Ying Li; Julia Quam; Richard Olson; Pamela Pehrsson; Lindsay Allen; Douglas Balentine; Manjit Hanspal; Deborah Hayward; Erin Pias Hines; James P McClung; Cria G Perrine; Mandy Brown Belfort; David Dallas; Bruce German; Jae Kim; Mark McGuire; Michelle McGuire; Ardythe L Morrow; Margaret Neville; Laurie Nommsen-Rivers; Kathleen M Rasmussen; Janos Zempleni; Christopher J Lynch Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Kefeng Li; Kerri Bertrand; Jane C Naviaux; Jonathan M Monk; Alan Wells; Lin Wang; Sai Sachin Lingampelly; Robert K Naviaux; Christina Chambers Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2022-09-15 Impact factor: 3.953
Authors: Keith R Shockley; Michelle C Cora; David E Malarkey; Daven Jackson-Humbles; Molly Vallant; Brad J Collins; Esra Mutlu; Veronica G Robinson; Surayma Waidyanatha; Amy Zmarowski; Nicholas Machesky; Jamie Richey; Sam Harbo; Emily Cheng; Kristin Patton; Barney Sparrow; June K Dunnick Journal: Toxicol Lett Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.372
Authors: Judy S LaKind; Marc-André Verner; Rachel D Rogers; Helen Goeden; Daniel Q Naiman; Satori A Marchitti; Geniece M Lehmann; Erin P Hines; Suzanne E Fenton Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-02-23 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Geniece M Lehmann; Judy S LaKind; Matthew H Davis; Erin P Hines; Satori A Marchitti; Cecilia Alcala; Matthew Lorber Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 9.031