| Literature DB >> 26822662 |
Zhengbo Chen1, Jiejie Hao1, Liping Wang2, Yi Wang1, Fandong Kong1, Weiming Zhu1.
Abstract
Wailupemycins H (1) and I (2) with a new skeleton coupled two 6-(2-phenylnaphthalene-1-yl)pyrane-2-one nuclei to a -CH2- linkage were identified from the culture of Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434 associated with the marine algae, Enteromorpha prolifera. Compounds 1 and 2 are two new α-glucosidase inhibitors with the Ki/IC50 values of 16.8/19.7 and 6.0/8.3 μM, respectively. In addition, the absolute configurations of wailupemycins D (3) and E (4) are also resolved in this paper for the first time.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26822662 PMCID: PMC4731795 DOI: 10.1038/srep20004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Structures of compounds 1−5.
Figure 2CD and ECD curves of 3 and ent-3.
Figure 3CD and ECD curves of 4 and ent-4.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR Data for 1 and 2 in DMSO-d (TMS, δ ppm)a.
| Position | 1 | 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (C) | 164.9 | 164.8 | ||
| 2 (C) | 100.2 | 99.9 | ||
| 3 (C) | 173.3 | 173.5 | ||
| 4 (CH) | 104.4 | 6.18, s | 103.3 | 5.67, s |
| 5 (C) | 160.5 | 159.6 | ||
| 6 (CH) | 54.1 | 4.71, s | 55.3 | 4.28, s |
| 7 (C) | 142.5 | 141.9 | ||
| 8 (CH) | 119.4 | 6.58, d (8.3) | 120.7 | 6.88, d (8.3) |
| 9 (CH) | 137.1 | 7.50, t (7.6) | 137.0 | 7.53, t (7.6) |
| 10 (CH) | 116.2 | 6.89, d (8.3) | 116.3 | 6.90, d (8.3) |
| 11 (C) | 161.5 | 161.4 | ||
| 12 (C) | 116.1 | 116.0 | ||
| 13 (C) | 203.7 | 204.4 | ||
| 14 (CH2) | 51.2 | 3.03, d (17.0) 3.63, d (17.0) | 45.9 | 2.92, d (17.2) 3.94, d (17.2) |
| 15 (C) | 75.4 | 74.8 | ||
| 16 (C) | 144.9 | 144.4 | ||
| 17/21 (CH) | 125.4 | 7.48, m | 125.2 | 7.39, m |
| 18/20 (CH) | 127.2 | 7.34, m | 127.5 | 7.31, m |
| 19 (CH) | 127.6 | 7.23, m | 127.6 | 7.25, m |
| 1′ (C) | 164.7 | 163.9 | ||
| 2′ (C) | 100.5 | 100.3 | ||
| 3′ (C) | 173.0 | 173.2 | ||
| 4′ (CH) | 106.2 | 5.80, s | 106.7 | 5.75, s |
| 5′ (C) | 157.5 | 157.5 | ||
| 6′ (C) | 119.5 | 119.5 | ||
| 7′ (C) | 135.2 | 135.2 | ||
| 8′ (CH) | 116.3 | 7.04, d (8.3) | 116.3 | 6.99, d (8.3) |
| 9′ (CH) | 128.7 | 7.37, m | 128.7 | 7.37, m |
| 10′ (CH) | 109.3 | 6.84, d (8.3) | 109.3 | 6.83, d (8.3) |
| 11′ (C) | 154.5 | 154.5 | ||
| 12′ (C) | 113.4 | 113.4 | ||
| 13′ (C) | 155.8 | 155.8 | ||
| 14′ (CH) | 109.8 | 6.78, s | 109.8 | 6.77, s |
| 15′ (C) | 140.2 | 140.2 | ||
| 16′ (C) | 141.0 | 141.0 | ||
| 17′/21′ (CH) | 128.5 | 7.25, m | 128.5 | 7.26, m |
| 18′/20′ (CH) | 128.0 | 7.33, m | 128.1 | 7.32, m |
| 19′ (CH) | 128.2 | 7.24, m | 128.3 | 7.25, m |
| 22 (CH2) | 17.9 | 3.27, s | 17.8 | 3.15, s |
aThe proton signals of HO-3, HO-11, HO-15, HO-3′ for 1 were 11.43 (br.s), 12.39 (br.s), 6.05 (br.s), and 11.30 (br.s), respectively. And the proton signals of HO-3, HO-11, and HO-15 for 2 were 11.33 (br.s), 12.36 (br.s), and 6.07 (br.s), respectively. However, the proton signals for HO-11′ and HO-13′ of 1 and HO-3′, HO-11′ and HO-13′ of 2 were not observed.
Figure 4Key HMBC, 1H-1H COSY correlations of 1 and 2.
Figure 5Key NOE correlations for 1 and 2.
Figure 6CD and ECD curves of 1, I and ent-I.
Figure 7CD and ECD curves of 2, II and ent-II.
Figure 8Plausible biosynthetic pathway of 1 and 2.
Figure 9Lineweaver–Burk plot of α-glucosidase inhibition of compounds 1 and 2 (α-glucosidase was treated with pNPG at various concentrations (0.5–2.0 mM) in the absence or presence of 1 and 2 at two different concentrations (34.6 and 69.2 μM for 1 and 17.3 and 34.6 μM for 2).
The kinetics assay has been performed after incubating the mixture at 37 °C for 15 min).