Literature DB >> 26822662

New α-glucosidase inhibitors from marine algae-derived Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434.

Zhengbo Chen1, Jiejie Hao1, Liping Wang2, Yi Wang1, Fandong Kong1, Weiming Zhu1.   

Abstract

Wailupemycins H (1) and I (2) with a new skeleton coupled two 6-(2-phenylnaphthalene-1-yl)pyrane-2-one nuclei to a -CH2- linkage were identified from the culture of Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434 associated with the marine algae, Enteromorpha prolifera. Compounds 1 and 2 are two new α-glucosidase inhibitors with the Ki/IC50 values of 16.8/19.7 and 6.0/8.3 μM, respectively. In addition, the absolute configurations of wailupemycins D (3) and E (4) are also resolved in this paper for the first time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26822662      PMCID: PMC4731795          DOI: 10.1038/srep20004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Diabetes mellitus is a clinical syndrome caused by genetic factors and environmental factors and characterized by high levels of blood glucose. For the past few years, the incidence of diabetes increased rapidly, and the diabetes treatment has become a global health problem1. Over 85% diabetics suffer from Type-II diabetes mellitus (DM)2. DM is a chronic disease with clinical manifestation of hyperglycemia, due to the ineffective of insulin that controls the level of blood glucose. α-Glucosidase inhibitors, such as acarbose, voglibose and miglitol, could retard the uptake of dietary carbohydrates and have achieved significant therapeutic effect in clinical application3. However, most of these products have side effects such as flatulence, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea4. Therefore, more secure and efficient inhibitors are the urgent demand for the treatment of diabetes. Marine is believed to be a natural treasure house for medicine, and natural products of marine microbial origin play an increasingly important role in drug diescovery5. In our ongoing search for bioactive natural products with new structures from marine microorganisms678, the EtOAc extract of the fermentation broth of Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434 associated with the marine green algae, Enteromorpha prolifera, exhibited significant α-glucosidase inhibitory activity at 50 μg/mL. Chemical study lead to the identification of two new epimeric polyketides that we named wailupemycins H (1) and I (2) with an unusual carbon skeleton coupled two 6-(2-phenylnaphthalene-1-yl)pyrane-2-one nuclei into a methylene linkage, along with the known wailupemycins D (3)9, E (4),10 and G (5)10 (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Structures of compounds 1−5.

Results

The constitutions and the relative configurations of the known compounds 3 and 4 were identical to those of wailupemycins D9 and E10 by comparing their NMR data (Table S1) and NOESY spectra, respectively (Figures S26 and S30). However, their absolute configurations have not been resolved yet in the literature. So we determined their absolute configurations by CD and ECD calculations of 3, ent-3 (Fig. 2), 4, and ent-4 (Fig. 3). The results showed that the CD spectra of 3 and 4 shared the almost identical Cotton effects with the calculated ECD, but opposite to the calculated ECD of ent-3 and ent-4, respectively. The absolute configurations of wailupemycins D (3) and E (4) were thus elucidated as (6S, 15R)- and (6R, 15R)-, respectively. The 15R- configuration of 3 was confirmed by Horeau’s method111213. After reaction with (±)2-phenylbutyric chloride, the recovered 2-phenylbutyric acid (2-PHA) showed positive specific rotation, indicating the S-enantiomeric excess of 2-PHA. To analyze the results, the quantum calculation of molecular energies on the products of 3 with 2R- and 2S- PHA (3a and 3b) was carried out by the time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) method at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level8. The calculation showed that the molecular energy of 3a is lower than 3b. (Table S2, Supporting Information), indicating the higher reaction rate of 3 with 2R-PHA agreed with the Horeau’s reaction result. Thus, the 15R- configuration of 3 was further supported.
Figure 2

CD and ECD curves of 3 and ent-3.

Figure 3

CD and ECD curves of 4 and ent-4.

Wailupemycin H (1) was obtained as yellow, amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was determined as C43H30O11 by the HRESIMS peak at m/z 723.1847 [M + H]+. Analysis of the 1H and 13C NMR data (Table 1) indicated that 1 contained α-pyrone and monosubstituted benzene residues similar to those of wailupemycins910141516. Careful comparison of the 1D (Table 1) and 2D NMR (Fig. 4) data with those of reported wailupemycins suggested the presence of two polyketide subunits A and B (Fig. 1), that is wailupemycins D (3)9 and G (5)10 moieties, respectively. However, the two sp2-methine signals (δH/C 5.17/89.2, 5.28/89.3) attributed to α-pyrone moieties of wailupemycins D (3) and G (5) were both disappeared (Table S1). Instead, two relatively downfield sp2-quaternary carbon signals (δC 100.2, 100.5) were present (Table 1, Figures S1−S3). In addition, a methylene signals at δH/C3.27/17.9 were observed in the NMR spectral of 1. These data suggested that subunits A and B in 1 were linked together by a methylene group. This deduction was confirmed by the key HMBC correlations of H-22 (δH 3.27) to C-1 (δC 164.9), C-2 (δC 100.2), C-1′ (δC 164.7), and C-2′ (δC 100.5) (Fig. 4). Thus, the constitution of wailupemycin H (1) was identified. The relative configuration of 1 was established by NOESY experiment (Fig. 5). Key NOE correlations from both H-14a (δH 3.63) and H-17 (δH 7.48) to H-6 (δH 4.71) and from H-17 (δH 7.48) to H-14a (δH 3.63) indicated the anti-orientation of the pyrone and phenyl moieties, suggesting the same relative configuration as 39. The absolute configuration of 1 (6S, 15R) was determined by ECD calculations of the simplified model compounds I (6S, 15R) and ent-I (6R, 15S) using TD-DFT method at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level8. The results showed that the measured CD curve of 1 is matched well with the calculated ECD for I and opposite to that of ent-I (Fig. 6).
Table 1

1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR Data for 1 and 2 in DMSO-d (TMS, δ ppm)a.

Position1δH,(J in Hz)2δH (J in Hz)
δCδC
1 (C)164.9 164.8 
2 (C)100.2 99.9 
3 (C)173.3 173.5 
4 (CH)104.46.18, s103.35.67, s
5 (C)160.5 159.6 
6 (CH)54.14.71, s55.34.28, s
7 (C)142.5 141.9 
8 (CH)119.46.58, d (8.3)120.76.88, d (8.3)
9 (CH)137.17.50, t (7.6)137.07.53, t (7.6)
10 (CH)116.26.89, d (8.3)116.36.90, d (8.3)
11 (C)161.5 161.4 
12 (C)116.1 116.0 
13 (C)203.7 204.4 
14 (CH2)51.23.03, d (17.0) 3.63, d (17.0)45.92.92, d (17.2) 3.94, d (17.2)
15 (C)75.4 74.8 
16 (C)144.9 144.4 
17/21 (CH)125.47.48, m125.27.39, m
18/20 (CH)127.27.34, m127.57.31, m
19 (CH)127.67.23, m127.67.25, m
1′ (C)164.7 163.9 
2′ (C)100.5 100.3 
3′ (C)173.0 173.2 
4′ (CH)106.25.80, s106.75.75, s
5′ (C)157.5 157.5 
6′ (C)119.5 119.5 
7′ (C)135.2 135.2 
8′ (CH)116.37.04, d (8.3)116.36.99, d (8.3)
9′ (CH)128.77.37, m128.77.37, m
10′ (CH)109.36.84, d (8.3)109.36.83, d (8.3)
11′ (C)154.5 154.5 
12′ (C)113.4 113.4 
13′ (C)155.8 155.8 
14′ (CH)109.86.78, s109.86.77, s
15′ (C)140.2 140.2 
16′ (C)141.0 141.0 
17′/21′ (CH)128.57.25, m128.57.26, m
18′/20′ (CH)128.07.33, m128.17.32, m
19′ (CH)128.27.24, m128.37.25, m
22 (CH2)17.93.27, s17.83.15, s

aThe proton signals of HO-3, HO-11, HO-15, HO-3′ for 1 were 11.43 (br.s), 12.39 (br.s), 6.05 (br.s), and 11.30 (br.s), respectively. And the proton signals of HO-3, HO-11, and HO-15 for 2 were 11.33 (br.s), 12.36 (br.s), and 6.07 (br.s), respectively. However, the proton signals for HO-11′ and HO-13′ of 1 and HO-3′, HO-11′ and HO-13′ of 2 were not observed.

Figure 4

Key HMBC, 1H-1H COSY correlations of 1 and 2.

Figure 5

Key NOE correlations for 1 and 2.

Figure 6

CD and ECD curves of 1, I and ent-I.

The molecular formula of wailupemycin I (2) was also C43H30O11 from the HRESIMS peak at m/z 723.1847 [M + H]+, indicating an isomer of 1. The similar UV, IR and 1D NMR spectra (Table 1) and 2D NMR pattern (Fig. 4) to those of 1 suggested that 2 was a stereoisomer of 1. The obvious chemical shifts of positions 4–8, 14, 15, and 22 between 1 and 2 further indicated the stereoisomer at C-6 and C-15. The NOESY spectrum (Fig. 5) of 2 showed cross-peaks between H-6 (δH 4.28) and HO-15 (δH 6.07), and between H-4 (δH 5.67) and H-21 (δH 7.39), indicating the same cis-orientation of the pyrone and phenyl moieties as wailupemycin E (4)10. However, no NOESY correlation between H-6 (δH 4.28) and H-14a (δH 2.92) indicated a 6-epimer. This deduction was confirmed by ECD calculations of the simplified model compounds II (6R, 15R) and ent-II (6S, 15S) using TD-DFT method at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level8. The consistency of CD curve of 2 to the calculated ECD for II and the opposition to ECD of ent-II (Fig. 7) indicated (6R, 15R)-configuration of 2.
Figure 7

CD and ECD curves of 2, II and ent-II.

Compounds 1 and 2 were postulated to be biosynthesized from compounds 3, 4 and 5 whose biosynthetic pathway had been elucidated to be from benzoyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA910. The aldol condensation took place between 3 or its enolate anion and formaldehyde to produce the key conjugated enone intermediate (a). The intermediate a further reacted with 5 or its enolate anion via a Michael addition to yield the keto-tautomer (b) of 1 that formed the more favorable enol-tautomer 1. By the same procedure, the bio-reactions between compounds 4 and 5 produced compound 2 (Fig. 8).
Figure 8

Plausible biosynthetic pathway of 1 and 2.

To elucidate the postulation and to further identify the structures of 1 and 2, a chemical transformation was performed using compounds 3, 4 and 5 as the materials. When reacted with 5 and HCHO in EtOH, compounds 3 and 4 formed 1 and 2 that were identified by ESIMS and co-HPLC experiments, respectively (Figure S31). Compounds 1–5 were assayed for their α-glucosidase inhibitory effects using p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) as a substrate171819, and cytotoxicity on murine small intestinal IEC-6 cell line by MTT method20 using the acarbose as the positive control. Compounds 1–5 exhibited stronger inhibitions of α-glucosidase and lower cytotoxicity than acarbose with the IC50/CC50 values of 19.7/279.8, 8.3/1317.2, 988.7/2750.0, 392.5/2975.3, and 239.3/2953.8, respectively (IC50 for acarbose, 1115.2 μM). The selectivity indexes (SI) of compounds 1–5 were 14.2, 158.5, 2.8, 7.6, and 12.3, respectively. The results indicated that the aromatization of cyclohexanone moiety and the 6,15-cis-orientation of the pyrone and phenyl moieties tend to increase the α-glucosidase inhibitory activity and decrease the cytotoxicity of these compounds. In addition, a study of enzyme kinetics indicated that 1 and 2 were competitive α-glucosidase inhibitors with the Ki of 16.8 and 6.0 μM, respectively (Fig. 9).
Figure 9

Lineweaver–Burk plot of α-glucosidase inhibition of compounds 1 and 2 (α-glucosidase was treated with pNPG at various concentrations (0.5–2.0 mM) in the absence or presence of 1 and 2 at two different concentrations (34.6 and 69.2 μM for 1 and 17.3 and 34.6 μM for 2).

The kinetics assay has been performed after incubating the mixture at 37 °C for 15 min).

Discussion

The aromatic dimers having a methylene linkage are rare in nature, especially originated from microorganism. Most of them were found in plant kingdom, such as italipyrone and homoarenol from Helichrysum stoechas21, two phloroglucinol derivatives from H. stoechas var. olonnense22, helipyrone and norhelipyrone from H. arenarium23, kunzeagin A (a dimeric flavonol glycoside) from Kunzea ambigua24, gerberinol from Diospyros kaki var. sylvestris25, and four acylphloroglucinol derivatives from Hypericum andinum26. As far as we know, very few of these natural dimers was identified in microbial kingdom, that is phaeochromycins F from Streptomyces sp.27, xyloketal F from Xylaria sp.28, and squarrosidine from Pholiota squarrosa29. This may be because there was less evidence on the biosynthesis of formaldehyde in microorganisms30. The isolation of wailupemycins H and I further reinforced the formaldehyde biosynthetic system could be occurred in microorganisms. And the good α-glucosidase inhibitory activity could also provide the alternative bioactivity screening for this kind of natural dimmers.

Methods

General experimental procedures

Optical rotations were measured with a JASCO P-1020 digital polarimeter. UV data were recorded with a Beckman DU 640 spectrophotometer, and CD data were collected using a JASCO J-815 spectropolarimeter. IR spectra were taken on a Nicolet NEXUS 470 spectrophotometer as KBr disks. 1H NMR, 13C NMR, DEPT, HMQC, HMBC, COSY, and NOESY spectra were recorded using Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer using TMS as an internal standard, and chemical shifts were recorded as δ values. Chemical shift values were referenced to residual solvent signals for DMSO (δH/δC, 2.50/ 39.5). HRESIMS data were recorded using a Q-TOF ULTIMA GLOBAL GAA076 LC mass spectrometer. HPLC and semi-preparative HPLC were performed using a Cholester column (COSMOSIL-pack, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 1 mL/min) and an ODS column [YMC-pack ODS-A, 10 × 250 mm, 5 μm, 4 mL/min], respectively. TLC and column chromatography (CC) were performed on plates precoated with silica gel GF254 (10−40 μm) and over silica gel (200−300 mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory) and Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences). Vacuum-liquid chromatography (VLC) used silica gel H (Qingdao Marine Chemical Factory).

Actinobacterial material

The actinobacterial strain Streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434 was isolated from E. prolifera collected from the Zhanqiao Beach (E 120°18′ 56.982″, N 36°03′ 42.659″, pH 6.0 in sea water), Qingdao, China in July 2012. The E. prolifera (1 g) were clipped and ground suspending in sterile distilled water. And then serially diluted to 1 mg/mL, 100 μL of which was deposited on a Gause’s synthetic agar plate containing chloramphenicol (100 μg/mL) as a bacterial inhibitor and incubated at 28 °C for 8 days. A single colony was transferred onto another Gause’s synthetic agar plate and was identified according to its morphological characteristics and 16S rRNA gene sequences (GenBank access No. KJ818249). A reference culture is maintained in our lab. at −80 °C. Working stocks were prepared on Gause’s synthetic agar slants and stored at 4 °C.

Fermentation and extraction

Spores were directly inoculated into 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 150 mL fermentation media consisted of glucose 20 g, beef extract 3 g, yeast extract 10 g, soluble starch 10 g, peptone 10 g, K2HPO4 0.5 g, MgSO4 0.5 g, CaCO3 2 g, and 1 L of old sea water, pH nature). The flasks were incubated on a rotatory shaker at 180 rpm and 28 °C for 8 days. 45 L of whole broth was extracted with equal volumes of EtOAc for three times. The EtOAc extract was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a dark brown gum (28.0 g).

Purification

The EtOAc extract (28 g) was subjected to a silica gel VLC column, eluting with a stepwise gradient of petroleum ether–CH2Cl2 (1:1 and 0:1) and then with MeOHCH2Cl2 (100:1, 75:1, 50:1, 25:1, 10:1, 1:1) to give eight fractions (Fr1–Fr8). Fr2–Fr5 (4.68 g) were combined and separated on a HP20SS column, eluting with a stepwise gradient of MeOHH2O (0%–100%, v/v) to give six fractions (H1–H8). Fraction H4 (403.5 mg) was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column eluting with MeOH to give four fractions (H4-1 to H4-4). Fraction H4-3 (38.1 mg) was further purified by HPLC on ODS (45% MeOHH2O, v/v) to yield 4 (5.6 mg, tR13.9 min). Fraction H5 (121.3 mg) was subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column eluting with MeOH to give three fractions (H5-1 to H5-3). Fraction H5-2 (31.2 mg) was further purified by HPLC on ODS (55% MeOHH2O, v/v) to yield 3 (14.7 mg, tR 10.5 min). Fraction H6 (243.7 mg) was also subjected to a Sephadex LH-20 column eluting with MeOH to give four fractions (H6-1 to H6-4). Fraction H6-2 (73.6 mg) was further purified by HPLC on ODS (70% MeOHH2O, v/v) to yield 5 (12.2 mg, tR 6.5 min). Fraction H6-3 (47.7 mg) was subjected to another Sephadex LH-20 column eluting with MeOH and further purified by HPLC on ODS (80% MeOHH2O, v/v) to yield 1 (4 mg, tR 6.5 min) and 2 (2.9 mg, tR 5.6 min).

Wailupemycin H (1)

yellow, amorphous powder; [α]25D +18.1 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 208 (4.49), 260 (4.18), 334 (3.82) nm; CD (c 0.11, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 206 (−1.28), 235 (+0.48), 256 (−0.31), 311 (+0.06) nm; IR (KBr) νmax 2922, 1704, 1677, 1571, 1198, 699 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 723.1847 [M + H]+ (calcd for C43H31O11, 723.1861).

Wailupemycin I (2)

yellow, amorphous powder; [α]25D −39.6 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 208 (4.49), 260 (4.18), 334 (3.82) nm; CD (c 0.11, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 229 (−0.31), 257 (+0.28), 291 (−0.73), 337 (+0.04) nm; IR(KBr) νmax 2922, 1704, 1677, 1571, 1198, 699 cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table 1; HRESIMS m/z 723.1847 [M + H]+ (calcd for C43H31O11, 723.1861).

Wailupemycin D (3)

yellow, amorphous powder; [α]25D +16.4 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 216 (3.53), 256 (3.12), 333 (1.57) nm; CD (c 0.73, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 212 (+0.1), 224 (+0.97), 263 (−0.2), 289 (+0.57) nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table S1. ESI-MS m/z 365.2 [M + H]+.

Wailupemycin E (4)

yellow, amorphous powder; [α]25D −28.6 (c 0.1, MeOH); UV (MeOH) λmax (logε) 215 (3.51), 256 (3.23), 332 (1.48) nm; CD (c 0.73, MeOH) λmax (Δε) 231 (−0.73), 258 (+0.5), 285 (−1.31), 329 (+0.11)nm; 1H and 13C NMR data, see Table S1. ESI-MS m/z 365.2 [M + H]+.

Horeau’s experiment

To a solution of 3 (5 mg, 13.7 μmol) in dry pyridine(1.5 mL), racemic 2-phenylbutyryl chloride (15 μL, 90.7 μmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at r.t. for 36 h. Water (3.0 mL) was then added and the mixture was allowed to stand for 30 min. The solution was extracted with EtOAc (3 × 10 mL) after adjusting the pH value to 9 by dropwise addition of NaOH (0.1 M). The aqueous layer was acidified to pH 3 using HCl (1 M) and then extracted with CH2Cl2 (3 × 10 mL). Evaporation of the CH2Cl2 solution gave the unreacted 2-PHA (5.3 mg) with [α]25D +5.8 (c 0.35, MeOH), indicating the S- enantiomeric excess.

Chemical transformations

To a solution of 3 (1.1 mg, 2.89 μmol) and 5 (1 mg, 2.89 μmol) in EtOH (1 mL) was added 1.85% formaldehyde solution (4 μL, 2.89 μmol) that was prepared by dilution of 37% HCHO aqueous solution with EtOH. The reaction mixture was heated at 80 °C for 3 h. HPLC analysis revealed three products one of which was identified as 1 by ESIMS peak at m/z 723.3 [M + H]+ and co-HPLC with the natural-1 (t 5.21 min, 80% MeCN/H2O, cholester packed column) (Figure S31). By the same procedure, compound 2 was formed from the reaction of 4 (1.1 mg, 2.89 μmol) with 5 (1 mg, 2.89 μmol) and 1.85% formaldehyde (4 μL, 2.89 μmol), and was identified by co-HPLC with the natural-2 (t 5.05 min, 80% MeCN/H2O, cholester packed column) along with the ESIMS peak at m/z 723.2 [M + H]+ (Figure S31).

α-Glucosidase inhibitory effect assay

The inhibitory effects were assayed as described preciously17. The sample was dissolved in sodium phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 6.8) at three concentrations. A volume of 10 μL of the sample solution, 20 μL of PBS and 20 μL of 2.0 mm p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) solution (in phosphate buffer) were mixed in a 96-well microplate and incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. A volume of 10 μL of α-glucosidase diluted to 0.2 U/mL by 0.01 M PBS was then added to each well. After incubating at 37 °C for 15 min, the absorbance at 405 nm was recorded by a Spectra max 190 micro plate reader (Molecular Devices Inc.). The blank was prepared by adding phosphate buffer instead of the α-glucosidase and the acarbose was used as a positive control. Blank readings (no enzyme) were subtracted from each well and results were compared to the control. The inhibition (%) was calculated as [1 − (ODdrug/ODblank)] ×100%. The IC50 value was calculated as the compound concentration that is required for 50% inhibition and the IC50 value of the acarbose was 1.12 mM.

Kinetics of α-glucosidase inhibitors

According to the paper1819, the mode of inhibition of compounds 1 and 2 against α-glucosidase activity was measured with increasing concentrations of pNPG (0, 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2.0 mM) as a substrate in the absence and presence of 1 and 2 at 34.6 and 69.2 μM, and 17.3 and 34.6 μM, respectively. Optimal amounts of compounds 1 and 2 used were determined based on the enzyme inhibitory activity assay. Mode of inhibition of 1 and 2 were determined by Lineweaver-Burk plot analysis of the data that were calculated by Michaelis-Menten kinetics.

Cytotoxic assay

The cytotoxicity on murine small intestinal IEC-6 cells were assayed by MTT (3-[4,5-dimethyl thiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) method20. The IEC-6 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37 °C. Cell suspension, 100 μL, at a density of 2 × 104 cell mL−1 was plated in 96-well microtiter plates and and exposed to different concentrations of compounds in triplicate for 72 h. The initial concentrations of compounds were 2 mg/mL in DMSO, and then were diluted into 625, 125, 25, 5, and 1 μg/mL with RPMI-1640 medium, respectively. The experiments were divided into blank control, testing compounds and the positive control groups, and each group was set up three parallels. Then, 10 μL of PBS containing MTT (final concentration: 0.5 mg/mL) was added to each well. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C, the supernatant was removed and 200 μL of DMSO was added to each well to solubilize the formazan crystals. After vigorous shaking, absorbance values were measured in a microplate reader (Bio-Rad, USA) at 570 nm. The cytotoxicity was represented at these concentrations as [(ODblank − ODdrug)/ODblank × 100%]. The CC50 value, defined as the compound concentration necessary to induce cell cytotoxicity by 50%, was calculated by SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solutions) v19.0 software.

ECD calculations

The calculations were performed by using the density functional theory (DFT) as carried out in the Gaussian 0330. The preliminary conformational distributions search was performed by HyperChem 7.5 software. All ground-state geometries were optimized at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level. Solvent effects of methanol solution were evaluated at the same DFT level by using the SCRF/PCM method313233. TDDFT34353637 at B3LYP/6-31G(d) was employed to calculate the electronic excitation energies and rotational strengths in methanol. The stable conformations obtained at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level were further used in magnetic shielding constants at the B3LYP/6-311++G(2d,p) level.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Chen, Z. et al. New α-glucosidase inhibitors from marine algae-derived streptomyces sp. OUCMDZ-3434. Sci. Rep. 6, 20004; doi: 10.1038/srep20004 (2016).
  19 in total

1.  Mutational analysis of the enterocin favorskii biosynthetic rearrangement.

Authors:  Longkuan Xiang; John A Kalaitzis; George Nilsen; Li Chen; Bradley S Moore
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  Lumutinines A-D, linearly fused macroline-macroline and macroline-sarpagine bisindoles from Alstonia macrophylla.

Authors:  Siew-Huah Lim; Shin-Jowl Tan; Yun-Yee Low; Toh-Seok Kam
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.050

3.  Isolation of a new phlorotannin, a potent inhibitor of carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes, from the brown alga Sargassum patens.

Authors:  Yasuko Kawamura-Konishi; Natsuko Watanabe; Miki Saito; Noriyuki Nakajima; Toshiyuki Sakaki; Takane Katayama; Toshiki Enomoto
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 5.279

Review 4.  Marine natural products.

Authors:  John W Blunt; Brent R Copp; Robert A Keyzers; Murray H G Munro; Michèle R Prinsep
Journal:  Nat Prod Rep       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 13.423

5.  Acylphloroglucinol derivatives from Hypericum andinum: antidepressant-like activity of andinin A.

Authors:  Gari V Ccana-Ccapatinta; Eveline D Stolz; Paola F da Costa; Stela M K Rates; Gilsane L von Poser
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 4.050

6.  [Determination of configurations by "partial resolution". 3. Steroidal alcohols].

Authors:  A Horeau; H B Kagan
Journal:  Tetrahedron       Date:  1964-11       Impact factor: 2.457

7.  Cytotoxic bipyridines from the marine-derived actinomycete Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus WH1-2216-6.

Authors:  Peng Fu; Shuxia Wang; Kui Hong; Xia Li; Peipei Liu; Yi Wang; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.050

8.  In vitro antioxidant and inhibitory potential of Terminalia bellerica and Emblica officinalis fruits against LDL oxidation and key enzymes linked to type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Suresh V Nampoothiri; A Prathapan; Ozhathil Lijo Cherian; K G Raghu; V V Venugopalan; A Sundaresan
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 6.023

9.  In vitro biosynthesis of unnatural enterocin and wailupemycin polyketides.

Authors:  John A Kalaitzis; Qian Cheng; Paul M Thomas; Neil L Kelleher; Bradley S Moore
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 4.050

10.  Phaeochromycins F-H, three new polyketide metabolites from Streptomyces sp. DSS-18.

Authors:  Jian Li; Chun-Hua Lu; Bao-Bing Zhao; Zhong-Hui Zheng; Yue-Mao Shen
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 2.883

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Metagenomics Approaches in Discovery and Development of New Bioactive Compounds from Marine Actinomycetes.

Authors:  Gyana Prakash Mahapatra; Surabhi Raman; Suman Nayak; Sushanto Gouda; Gitishree Das; Jayanta Kumar Patra
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Natural Products Research in China From 2015 to 2016.

Authors:  Haishan Liu; Guoliang Zhu; Yaqin Fan; Yuqi Du; Mengmeng Lan; Yibo Xu; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  Polyketides From the Endophytic Fungus Cladosporium sp. Isolated From the Mangrove Plant Excoecaria agallocha.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Xiuli Han; Guoliang Zhu; Yi Wang; Arthit Chairoungdua; Pawinee Piyachaturawat; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 4.  Bioactive Compounds Isolated from Marine-Derived Microbes in China: 2009-2018.

Authors:  Weiwei Sun; Wenhui Wu; Xueling Liu; Diana A Zaleta-Pinet; Benjamin R Clark
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 5.118

Review 5.  Marine Pharmacology in 2016-2017: Marine Compounds with Antibacterial, Antidiabetic, Antifungal, Anti-Inflammatory, Antiprotozoal, Antituberculosis and Antiviral Activities; Affecting the Immune and Nervous Systems, and Other Miscellaneous Mechanisms of Action.

Authors:  Alejandro M S Mayer; Aimee J Guerrero; Abimael D Rodríguez; Orazio Taglialatela-Scafati; Fumiaki Nakamura; Nobuhiro Fusetani
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.118

6.  Pentacyclic Triterpenoids from Sabia discolor Dunn and Their α-Glycosidase Inhibitory Activities.

Authors:  Jin-Hong Ma; Dan Hu; Lu-Lu Deng; Jiang Li; Xiao-Jiang Hao; Shu-Zhen Mu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Azaphilones from the Marine Sponge-Derived Fungus Penicillium sclerotiorum OUCMDZ-3839.

Authors:  Qian Jia; Yuqi Du; Chen Wang; Yi Wang; Tonghan Zhu; Weiming Zhu
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 5.118

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.