Literature DB >> 15313779

Using learned calls to study sensory-motor integration in songbirds.

David S Vicario1.   

Abstract

Communicating songbirds produce calls as well as song and some of these are learned. One of these-the long call in zebra finches-is used by both sexes in similar behavioral contexts, but is learned in males and not in females. The male long call includes learned spectral and temporal features. In several studies, the learned long call has been used as a tool to study sensory-motor integration and vocal learning in a way that complements the use of song. Lesion studies showed that production of the male-typical call features requires an intact nucleus RA, the sexually dimorphic source of the telencephalic projection to brainstem vocal effectors. Behavioral studies that quantified zebra finch calling in response to long call playbacks showed that intact adult males have a categorical preference, absent in females, for the long calls of females over those of males. By using synthetic call stimuli, it was found that males use both spectral and temporal information to classify long call stimuli by gender, but that females use only temporal information. In juvenile males, the emergence of categorical preference occurs during the same period when RA matures anatomically (40-50 days) and the first male-typical vocalizations are produced. Adult males with RA lesions lost the categorical preference for female long calls, suggesting that RA could also play a role in long call discrimination. Preliminary analysis of recordings from neurons in NCM-a telencephalic auditory area (see Mello and colleagues, this volume)-suggests a pattern of responses to the spectral features of synthetic call stimuli that parallels the behavioral responses they elicit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313779     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1298.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  18 in total

1.  Differential influence of frequency, timing, and intensity cues in a complex acoustic categorization task.

Authors:  Katherine I Nagel; Helen M McLendon; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sex-dependent hemispheric asymmetries for processing frequency-modulated sounds in the primary auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  Stuart D Washington; Jagmeet S Kanwal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience.

Authors:  Mimi L Phan; David S Vicario
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Sensory feedback independent pre-song vocalizations correlate with time to song initiation.

Authors:  Divya Rao; Satoshi Kojima; Raghav Rajan
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Implicit Memory for Complex Sounds in Higher Auditory Cortex of the Ferret.

Authors:  Kai Lu; Wanyi Liu; Peng Zan; Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  The zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata: an avian model for investigating the neurobiological basis of vocal learning.

Authors:  Claudio V Mello
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2014-10-23

7.  Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules.

Authors:  Kentaro Abe; Dai Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Automated auditory recognition training and testing.

Authors:  Austen Gess; David M Schneider; Akshat Vyas; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Early experience shapes vocal neural coding and perception in songbirds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.038

Review 10.  It takes a seasoned bird to be a good listener: communication between the sexes.

Authors:  Eliot A Brenowitz; Luke Remage-Healey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 6.627

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.