Literature DB >> 2681557

Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function.

A H Calvert1, D R Newell, L A Gumbrell, S O'Reilly, M Burnell, F E Boxall, Z H Siddik, I R Judson, M E Gore, E Wiltshaw.   

Abstract

A dosage formula has been derived from a retrospective analysis of carboplatin pharmacokinetics in 18 patients with pretreatment glomerular filtration rates (GFR) in the range of 33 to 136 mL/min. Carboplatin plasma clearance was linearly related to GFR (r = 0.85, P less than .00001) and rearrangements of the equation describing the correlation gave the dosage formula dose (mg) = target area under the free carboplatin plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) x (1.2 x GFR + 20). In a prospective clinical and pharmacokinetic study the formula was used to determine the dose required to treat 31 patients (GFR range, 33 to 135 mL/min) with 40 courses of carboplatin. The target AUC was escalated from 3 to 8 mg carboplatin/mL/min. Over this AUC range the formula accurately predicted the observed AUC (observed/predicted ratio 1.24 +/- 0.11, r = 0.886) and using these additional data, the formula was refined. Dose (mg) = target AUC x (GFR + 25) is now the recommended formula. AUC values of 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 mg/mL. min gave rise to manageable hematological toxicity in previously treated and untreated patients, respectively, and hence target AUC values of 5 and 7 mg/mL min are recommended for single-agent carboplatin in these patient groups. Pharmacokinetic modeling demonstrated that the formula was reasonably accurate regardless of whether a one- or two-compartment model most accurately described carboplatin pharmacokinetics, assuming that body size did not influence nonrenal clearance. The validity of this assumption was demonstrated in 13 patients where no correlation between surface area and nonrenal clearance was found (r = .31, P = .30). Therefore, the formula provides a simple and consistent method of determining carboplatin dose in adults. Since the measure of carboplatin exposure in the formula is AUC, and not toxicity, it will not be influenced by previous or concurrent myelosuppressive therapy or supportive measures. The formula is therefore applicable to combination and high-dose studies as well as conventional single-agent therapy, although the target AUC for carboplatin will need to be redefined for combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2681557     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  335 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetically guided administration of chemotherapeutic agents.

Authors:  H J van den Bongard; R A Mathôt; J H Beijnen; J H Schellens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Measures of exposure versus measures of rate and extent of absorption.

Authors:  M L Chen; L Lesko; R L Williams
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Body surface area as a determinant of pharmacokinetics and drug dosing.

Authors:  M Sawyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  All half-lives are wrong, but some half-lives are useful.

Authors:  J G Wright; A V Boddy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin and carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Laura Vidal; Margarita Magem; Clare Barlow; Beatriz Pardo; Amalia Florez; Ana Montes; Margarita Garcia; Ian Judson; Claudia Lebedinsky; Stan B Kaye; Ramón Salazar
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 6.  Drug therapy for gynaecological cancer in older women.

Authors:  R E van Rijswijk; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Phase I study of paclitaxel on a 3-hour schedule followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E K Rowinsky; W A Flood; S E Sartorius; K M Bowling; D S Ettinger
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.850

8.  Improving Carboplatin Dosing Based on Estimated GFR.

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Alterations of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug-drug interactions.

Authors:  Sridhar Mani; Mohammed Ghalib; Imran Chaudhary; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.481

10.  Protective effect of amifostine against toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin in non-small cell lung cancer: a single center randomized study.

Authors:  Ozkan Kanat; Turkkan Evrensel; Ibrahim Baran; Hakan Coskun; Mehmet Zarifoglu; Omer Faruk Turan; Ender Kurt; Mutlu Demiray; Guzin Gonullu; Osman Manavoglu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.