BACKGROUND: Drug interactions in oncology are common place and largely ignored as we tolerate high thresholds of 'toxic' drug responses in these patients. However, in the era of 'targeted' or seemingly 'less toxic' therapy, these interactions are more commonly flagged and contribute significantly towards poor 'quality of life' and medical fatalities. OBJECTIVE: This review and opinion article focuses on alteration of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug interactions in the setting of polypharmacy. The assumption is that the drugs, with changes in their pharmacokinetics, will contribute towards changes in their pharmacodynamics. METHODS: The examples cited for such drug-drug interactions are culled from published literature with an emphasis on those interactions that have been well characterized at the molecular level. RESULTS: Although very few drug interaction studies have been performed on approved oncology based drugs, it is clear that drugs whose pharmacokinetics profiles are closely related to their pharmacodynamics will indeed result in clinically important drug interactions. Some newer mechanisms are described that involve interactions at the level of gene transcription, whereby, drug metabolism is significantly altered. However, for any given drug interaction, there does not seem to be a comprehensive model describing interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanisms based drug interactions are plentiful in oncology; however, there is an absolute lack of a comprehensive model that would predict drug-drug interactions.
BACKGROUND: Drug interactions in oncology are common place and largely ignored as we tolerate high thresholds of 'toxic' drug responses in these patients. However, in the era of 'targeted' or seemingly 'less toxic' therapy, these interactions are more commonly flagged and contribute significantly towards poor 'quality of life' and medical fatalities. OBJECTIVE: This review and opinion article focuses on alteration of chemotherapeutic pharmacokinetic profiles by drug interactions in the setting of polypharmacy. The assumption is that the drugs, with changes in their pharmacokinetics, will contribute towards changes in their pharmacodynamics. METHODS: The examples cited for such drug-drug interactions are culled from published literature with an emphasis on those interactions that have been well characterized at the molecular level. RESULTS: Although very few drug interaction studies have been performed on approved oncology based drugs, it is clear that drugs whose pharmacokinetics profiles are closely related to their pharmacodynamics will indeed result in clinically important drug interactions. Some newer mechanisms are described that involve interactions at the level of gene transcription, whereby, drug metabolism is significantly altered. However, for any given drug interaction, there does not seem to be a comprehensive model describing interactions. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanisms based drug interactions are plentiful in oncology; however, there is an absolute lack of a comprehensive model that would predict drug-drug interactions.
Authors: Pauline Breedveld; Noam Zelcer; Dick Pluim; Ozgür Sönmezer; Matthijs M Tibben; Jos H Beijnen; Alfred H Schinkel; Olaf van Tellingen; Piet Borst; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Reginald F Frye; Sara M Fitzgerald; Theodore F Lagattuta; Matthew W Hruska; Merrill J Egorin Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Changcheng Zhou; Michelle M Tabb; Asal Sadatrafiei; Felix Grün; Bruce Blumberg Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2004-07-21 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: R Fety; F Rolland; M Barberi-Heyob; J L Merlin; T Conroy; A Hardouin; A Riviere; G Milano Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 1994 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: A H Calvert; D R Newell; L A Gumbrell; S O'Reilly; M Burnell; F E Boxall; Z H Siddik; I R Judson; M E Gore; E Wiltshaw Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1989-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jane R Kenny; Sophie Mukadam; Chenghong Zhang; Suzanne Tay; Carol Collins; Aleksandra Galetin; S Cyrus Khojasteh Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Erica J Reschly; Madhukumar Venkatesh; Sridhar Mani; Sean Ekins Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-06-17 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Christian Lüpfert; Martin Dyroff; Oliver von Richter; Dieter Gallemann; Samer El Bawab; Hugues Dolgos; Don Jung; Stefan Hecht; Andreas Johne Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2018-10-31