Literature DB >> 26814516

Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study.

Z Pan1, P M Patil2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A 5-year retrospective study evaluated the incidence and causes for removal of titanium miniplates.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The surgical records of 156 patients treated with rigid internal fixation after maxillofacial traumas were reviewed. Study variables included age, sex, site of fracture, site and number of plates, time of plate removal and reasons for plate removal.
RESULTS: Of 384 plates used for fixation, 35 plates (9 %) in 21 patients (13.5 %) were removed due to hardware related complications. Statistical significance (p < 0.01) was observed in mandibular body and parasymphysis fractures with regards to both fracture site location and plate removal rates. Most plates were removed within the first year after placement (p < 0.01). The highest number of fractures were observed in the 20-30 years group (p < 0.01) while most cases of removal were in the 30-40 years group (p < 0.01). Secondary reconstruction/growth facilitation (11/156, 7 %) (p < 0.01) was the main cause of plate removal while infection/wound dehiscence (9/156, 6 %) (p < 0.01) was the main cause for complication related plate removal. A significantly greater number of plates placed via intraoral incisions (p < 0.01) needed removal.
CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of complication related plate removal (7 %) in the mid and upper face in this study suggests that routine removal of asymptomatic titanium miniplates after maxillofacial trauma at these sites may not be beneficial. The high rate of mandibular site complications (19 %) in this study suggests that routine removal of titanium hardware from mandibular sites may be indicated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Maxillofacial trauma; Osteosynthesis; Removal; Rigid fixation; Titanium miniplate

Year:  2013        PMID: 26814516     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-013-0348-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  21 in total

Review 1.  Removal of asymptomatic bone plates used for orthognathic surgery and facial fractures.

Authors:  B Alpert; D Seligson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Recovery of maxillary sinus and tooth sensibility after le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  K E Kahnberg; H Engström
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.651

3.  Ten years of mandibular fractures: an analysis of 2,137 cases.

Authors:  E Ellis; K F Moos; A el-Attar
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1985-02

4.  Squamous cell carcinoma developing in conjunction with a mandibular staple bone plate.

Authors:  K E Friedman; S E Vernon
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in orthognathic surgery patients.

Authors:  Y Manor; G Chaushu; S Taicher
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.895

6.  The behaviour of titanium as a biomaterial: microscopy study of plates and surrounding tissues in facial osteosynthesis.

Authors:  J Acero; J Calderon; J I Salmeron; J J Verdaguer; C Concejo; M L Somacarrera
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Use of resorbable plates and screws in pediatric facial fractures.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  The fate of plates and screws after facial fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  T J Francel; B C Birely; P R Ringelman; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Policy of routine titanium miniplate removal after maxillofacial trauma.

Authors:  Hanna Thorén; Johanna Snäll; Wock Hallermann; Eeva Kormi; Jyrki Törnwall
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Removal of bone plates in patients with maxillofacial trauma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdulaziz A Bakathir; Manjunath V Margasahayam; Mohammed I Al-Ismaily
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-03-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of degradable osteosynthesis plates of MgYREZr alloy on cell function of human osteoblasts, fibroblasts and osteosarcoma cells.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Aydin Gülses; Jörg Wiltfang; Yahya Açil
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Radiographic evaluation of percutaneous transfacial wiring versus open internal fixation for surgical treatment of unstable zygomatic bone fractures.

Authors:  Guillaume Giran; Arnaud Paré; Benjamin Croisé; Carine Koudougou; Jacques Marie Mercier; Boris Laure; Pierre Corre; Hélios Bertin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of u-HA/PLLA, a Bioactive Resorbable Reconstruction Material: Applications in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Huy Xuan Ngo; Yunpeng Bai; Jingjing Sha; Shinji Ishizuka; Erina Toda; Rie Osako; Akira Kato; Reon Morioka; Mrunalini Ramanathan; Hiroto Tatsumi; Tatsuo Okui; Takahiro Kanno
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  Is Mini-Plate Removal Necessary for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patients? A Five-Year Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Mehdi Fani; Sahand Samieirad; Zahra Shooshtari; Maryam Jamali; Elahe Tohidi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-04-07

5.  In vivo biocompatibility evaluation of 3D-printed nickel-titanium fabricated by selective laser melting.

Authors:  Hendrik Naujokat; Ali Ihsan Gökkaya; Yahya Açil; Klaas Loger; Tim Klüter; Sabine Fuchs; Jörg Wiltfang
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.