Literature DB >> 10368092

Risk factors contributing to symptomatic plate removal in orthognathic surgery patients.

Y Manor1, G Chaushu, S Taicher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study analyzed the fate of miniplates in orthognathic surgery and defined risk factors that eventually result in plate removal. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outpatient clinic files of 70 patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery were reviewed. All osteotomies were rigidly fixed with stainless steel or titanium miniplates. Study variables included age, gender, plate material, site of plates, and reasons for plate removal.
RESULTS: Of 260 plates used for fixation, 31 were removed (12%). When all factors were considered together, only age was statistically significant. Patients older than 30 years of age were more likely to have plate removal (22% vs. 9%). Only when each factor was considered separately were gender and plate material statistically significant. Females (15.4% vs. 6.7%) and stainless steel plates (15.5% vs. 6.7%) were more prone to plate removal. Although more plates were removed from the buttress (15.5%) and chin (14.5%) compared with the piriform area (6.4%), this was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Age can be defined as a primary risk factor for plate removal, whereas gender and plate material are secondary. Although age and gender are not controllable, the use of titanium plates and infection control may lower the number of symptomatic plates and the need for their removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10368092     DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90430-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  8 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Post-operative Infection Following Single Piece Osteotomy.

Authors:  P U Abdul Wahab; P Senthil Nathan; M Madhulaxmi; M R Muthusekhar; Soh Chen Loong; Rajendra Prabhu Abhinav
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-01

2.  The process of orthognathic care in an NHS region.

Authors:  R Parbatani; A C Williams; A J Ireland; J R Sandy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Z Pan; P M Patil
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Cost-Effectiveness of a Biodegradable Compared to a Titanium Fixation System in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  N B van Bakelen; K M Vermeulen; G J Buijs; J Jansma; J G A M de Visscher; Th J M Hoppenreijs; J E Bergsma; B Stegenga; R R M Bos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Causes and incidence of miniplate removal following Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  Afshin Haraji; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Nima Moharamnejad
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-10-12

6.  Hardware Removal in Maxillofacial Trauma: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Chithra Aramanadka; Abhay T Kamath; G Srikanth; Deepika Pai; Nishu Singla; Shriya Daundiyal; Avani Desai
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  Evaluation of the Fatigue Performance and Degradability of Resorbable PLDLLA-TMC Osteofixations.

Authors:  Constantin Landes; Alexander Ballon; Shahram Ghanaati; Daniel Ebel; Dieter Ulrich; Uwe Spohn; Ute Heunemann; Robert Sader; Raimund Jaeger
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2013-11-29

8.  Is Mini-Plate Removal Necessary for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Patients? A Five-Year Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Mehdi Fani; Sahand Samieirad; Zahra Shooshtari; Maryam Jamali; Elahe Tohidi
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2020-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.