Literature DB >> 1409991

The fate of plates and screws after facial fracture reconstruction.

T J Francel1, B C Birely, P R Ringelman, P N Manson.   

Abstract

Rigid plate and screw fixation is the mainstay of treatment for complex fractures of the facial skeleton. Complications of plate and screw fixation include prominence, infection, exposure, and migration. Five hundred and seven patients undergoing plate and screw fixation for facial fractures (1112 fractures) from 1983 to 1988 were followed for complications. Sixty-one patients (12 percent) required hardware removal. The location on the facial skeleton influenced symptoms and the rate of hardware removal. Infection and exposure may be decreased with antiseptic irrigations, avoiding mucosal damage, attention to proper mucosal closure, and correct placement of plates. Prominence may be decreased by the use of microplates in the supraorbital, frontal, and naso-orbital-ethmoid locations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1409991     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199210000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  19 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  Complications of rigid internal fixation.

Authors:  Chris A Campbell; Kant Y Lin
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

3.  [Implant materials for the internal fixation of midfacial fractures].

Authors:  B A Stuck; T Heller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Resorbable Versus Titanium Rigid Fixation for Pediatric Mandibular Fractures: A Systematic Review, Institutional Experience and Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew E Pontell; Eva B Niklinska; Stephane A Braun; Nolan Jaeger; Kevin J Kelly; Michael S Golinko
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2021-06-21

5.  Evaluation of the Biodegradable Plates (PG910/PDO) for Reconstruction of Various Sizes of Orbital Floor Defects in the Blow-Out Fractures.

Authors:  Reza Tabrizi; Nicole J Langner; Ayatollah Pouzesh; Hamidreza Arabion
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-06-24

6.  Management of pediatric mandibular fractures using bioresorbable plating system - Efficacy, stability, and clinical outcomes: Our experiences and literature review.

Authors:  Mahinder Singh; R K Singh; Deepak Passi; Mohit Aggarwal; Guneet Kaur
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-10-17

7.  Fibrous wound repair associated with biodegradable poly-L/D-lactide copolymer implants: study of the expression of tenascin and cellular fibronectin.

Authors:  R Kontio; A Salo; R Suuronen; C Lindqvist; J H Meurman; I Virtanen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Z Pan; P M Patil
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.693

9.  Causes and incidence of miniplate removal following Le Fort I osteotomy.

Authors:  Afshin Haraji; Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi; Nima Moharamnejad
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2009-10-12

10.  Evaluation of the Fatigue Performance and Degradability of Resorbable PLDLLA-TMC Osteofixations.

Authors:  Constantin Landes; Alexander Ballon; Shahram Ghanaati; Daniel Ebel; Dieter Ulrich; Uwe Spohn; Ute Heunemann; Robert Sader; Raimund Jaeger
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2013-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.