Literature DB >> 26811447

Songbirds use spectral shape, not pitch, for sound pattern recognition.

Micah R Bregman1, Aniruddh D Patel2, Timothy Q Gentner3.   

Abstract

Humans easily recognize "transposed" musical melodies shifted up or down in log frequency. Surprisingly, songbirds seem to lack this capacity, although they can learn to recognize human melodies and use complex acoustic sequences for communication. Decades of research have led to the widespread belief that songbirds, unlike humans, are strongly biased to use absolute pitch (AP) in melody recognition. This work relies almost exclusively on acoustically simple stimuli that may belie sensitivities to more complex spectral features. Here, we investigate melody recognition in a species of songbird, the European Starling (Sturnus vulgaris), using tone sequences that vary in both pitch and timbre. We find that small manipulations altering either pitch or timbre independently can drive melody recognition to chance, suggesting that both percepts are poor descriptors of the perceptual cues used by birds for this task. Instead we show that melody recognition can generalize even in the absence of pitch, as long as the spectral shapes of the constituent tones are preserved. These results challenge conventional views regarding the use of pitch cues in nonhuman auditory sequence recognition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  absolute pitch; comparative cognition; pattern perception; pitch processing; songbirds

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26811447      PMCID: PMC4760803          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1515380113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  41 in total

1.  Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre.

Authors:  C L Krumhansl; P Iverson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Neural correlates of auditory streaming in an objective behavioral task.

Authors:  Naoya Itatani; Georg M Klump
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.

Authors:  M A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Critical bands and critical-ratio bandwidth in the European starling.

Authors:  U Langemann; G M Klump; R J Dooling
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Temporal scales of auditory objects underlying birdsong vocal recognition.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of missing fundamental by a species of songbird (Sturnus vulgaris).

Authors:  J Cynx; M Shapiro
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  Is relative pitch specific to pitch?

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Andriana J Lehr; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-12

9.  Human melody singing by bullfinches (Pyrrhula pyrrula) gives hints about a cognitive note sequence processing.

Authors:  Jürgen Nicolai; Christina Gundacker; Katharina Teeselink; Hans Rudolf Güttinger
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Pitch and timbre interfere when both are parametrically varied.

Authors:  Valeria C Caruso; Evan Balaban
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Time-dependent discrimination advantages for harmonic sounds suggest efficient coding for memory.

Authors:  Malinda J McPherson; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neural coding of sound envelope structure in songbirds.

Authors:  Santiago Boari; Ana Amador
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Auditory Selectivity for Spectral Contrast in Cortical Neurons and Behavior.

Authors:  Nina L T So; Jacob A Edwards; Sarah M N Woolley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  How We Hear: The Perception and Neural Coding of Sound.

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Learning metrics on spectrotemporal modulations reveals the perception of musical instrument timbre.

Authors:  Etienne Thoret; Baptiste Caramiaux; Philippe Depalle; Stephen McAdams
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2020-11-30

6.  Finding, visualizing, and quantifying latent structure across diverse animal vocal repertoires.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Marvin Thielk; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Animal Pitch Perception: Melodies and Harmonies.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2017

8.  Name that tune: Melodic recognition by songbirds.

Authors:  Christopher N Templeton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Acoustic fine structure may encode biologically relevant information for zebra finches.

Authors:  Nora H Prior; Edward Smith; Shelby Lawson; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Sex Differences in Rhythmic Preferences in the Budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus): A Comparative Study with Humans.

Authors:  Marisa Hoeschele; Daniel L Bowling
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.