Literature DB >> 34194658

Computer-Assisted Surgery in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Experience.

Andrea Giorgini1, Luigi Tarallo1, Michele Novi1, Giuseppe Porcellini1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, new technologies have been applied to shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this work was to show that navigated RSA allows the surgeon to reach the planned version/inclination in all cases. In this article are shown preliminary data, advantages, disadvantages and limits of the technique.
METHODS: Eighteen computer-assisted reverse shoulder arthroplasty were performed. Preoperative glenoid version and inclination were evaluated with preoperative CT scan using Orthoblue® (Exactech, Gainesville, FL,USA) software, as well as baseplate type, planned glenoid component seating, planned postoperative version, planned postoperative inclination, intraoperative glenoid version/inclination, screw length and surgical time. A senior shoulder surgeon has analyzed the advantages, disadvantages and limitation of this kind of surgery.
RESULTS: Mean surgical time of the primary implants was 92 ± 12 min (min 75-max 110). Mean preoperative inclination was + 2.6° ± 6.4, mean preoperative version was - 7.6° ± 8.4. Mean planned postoperative inclination was - 2.7° ± 2.3, mean planned postoperative version was - 1.6° ± 2.9 and mean planned glenoid seating was 89% ± 8%. Planned settings were reached in all cases during surgery. Baseplate implanted were in nine cases 8° posterior augmented, in six cases standard and in three cases 10° superior augmented. Mean screw length was 33.5 mm ± 4.2 mm. No GPS system failure has been recorded. One coracoid fracture occurred during the first case. DISCUSSION: Intraoperative navigation system is a reliable and user-friendly technology that allows the surgeon to reach planned glenoid positioning during surgery. Furthermore, this technology will allow the surgeon to compare clinical outcomes to component positioning data. The lack of humeral implant navigation is the main limit of this technique. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Computer-assisted RSA; Computer-assisted surgery reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Navigated reverse shoulder; Navigation; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder replacement

Year:  2021        PMID: 34194658      PMCID: PMC8192603          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-020-00344-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  27 in total

1.  Three-dimensional imaging and templating improve glenoid implant positioning.

Authors:  Joseph P Iannotti; Scott Weiner; Eric Rodriguez; Naveen Subhas; Thomas E Patterson; Bong Jae Jun; Eric T Ricchetti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 2.  Grammont reverse prosthesis: design, rationale, and biomechanics.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Duncan J Watkinson; Armodios M Hatzidakis; Frederic Balg
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Role of intraoperative navigation in the fixation of the glenoid component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a clinical case-control study.

Authors:  Piyush S Nashikkar; Corey J Scholes; Mark D Haber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  Grammont inverted prosthesis for the treatment of cuff tear arthropathy: a 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Vincenzo de Cupis; Claudio Chillemi; Mario Marinelli
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 5.  Biomechanics of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan L Berliner; Ashton Regalado-Magdos; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 6.  Benefit of intraoperative navigation on glenoid component positioning during total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Julia Vavken; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Vavken
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Patrick J Denard; Pascal Boileau; Alain Farron; Pierric Deransart; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christophe Lévigne; Pascal Boileau; Luc Favard; Pascal Garaud; Daniel Molé; François Sirveaux; Gilles Walch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Glenoid component positioning and guidance techniques in anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David M Burns; Tym Frank; Cari M Whyne; Patrick Dg Henry
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 10.  Technology applications in shoulder replacement.

Authors:  G Porcellini; L Tarallo; M Novi; F Spiezia; F Catani
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.