Literature DB >> 32499955

Optimal breast cancer diagnostic strategy using combined ultrasound and diffuse optical tomography.

K M Shihab Uddin1, Menghao Zhang2, Mark Anastasio1,3, Quing Zhu1.   

Abstract

Ultrasound (US)-guided near-infrared diffuse optical tomography (DOT) has demonstrated great potential as an adjunct breast cancer diagnosis tool to US imaging alone, especially in reducing unnecessary benign biopsies. However, DOT data processing and image reconstruction speeds remain slow compared to the real-time speed of US. Real-time or near real-time diagnosis with DOT is an important step toward the clinical translation of US-guided DOT. Here, to address this important need, we present a two-stage diagnostic strategy that is both computationally efficient and accurate. In the first stage, benign lesions are identified in near real-time by use of a random forest classifier acting on the DOT measurements and the radiologists' US diagnostic scores. Any lesions that cannot be reliably classified by the random forest classifier will be passed on to the second stage which begins with image reconstruction. Functional information from the reconstructed hemoglobin concentrations is employed by a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier for diagnosis at the end of the second stage. This two-step classification approach which combines both perturbation data and functional features, results in improved classification, as denoted by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Using this two-step approach, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.937 ± 0.009, with a sensitivity of 91.4% and specificity of 85.7%. In comparison, using functional features and US score yields an AUC of 0.892 ± 0.027, with a sensitivity of 90.2% and specificity of 74.5%. Most notably, the specificity is increased by more than 10% due to the implementation of the random forest classifier.
© 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32499955      PMCID: PMC7249842          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.389275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  27 in total

Review 1.  Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Merih Guray; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-05

2.  A digital x-ray tomosynthesis coupled near infrared spectral tomography system for dual-modality breast imaging.

Authors:  Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Kelly E Michaelsen; Brian W Pogue; Steven P Poplack; Ian Shaw; Ken Defrietas; Ken Brooks; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  Light shadowing effect of large breast lesions imaged by optical tomography in reflection geometry.

Authors:  Chen Xu; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Electromagnetic breast imaging: results of a pilot study in women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Steven P Poplack; Tor D Tosteson; Wendy A Wells; Brian W Pogue; Paul M Meaney; Alexander Hartov; Christine A Kogel; Sandra K Soho; Jennifer J Gibson; Keith D Paulsen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Time-domain optical mammography SoftScan: initial results.

Authors:  Xavier Intes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  Hamed Vavadi; Atahar Mostafa; Feifei Zhou; K M Shihab Uddin; Murad Althobaiti; Chen Xu; Rajeev Bansal; Foluso Ademuyiwa; Steven Poplack; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  US-guided optical tomography: correlation with clinicopathologic variables in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Min Jung Kim; Ji Hyun Youk; Hee Jung Moon; Hee Jung Suh; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Breast ultrasonography: state of the art.

Authors:  Regina J Hooley; Leslie M Scoutt; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Breast cancer detection using sonography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Jimmy Okello; Harriet Kisembo; Sam Bugeza; Moses Galukande
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Reducing image artifact in diffuse optical tomography by iterative perturbation correction based on multiwavelength measurements.

Authors:  K M Shihab Uddin; Quing Zhu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.170

View more
  1 in total

1.  Differentiating non-lactating mastitis and malignant breast tumors by deep-learning based AI automatic classification system: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Bo-Jian Feng; Wen-Wen Yue; Yuan Liu; Zhi-Feng Xu; Wei Xing; Zhao Xu; Jin-Cao Yao; Shu-Rong Wang; Dong Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.738

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.