Literature DB >> 25943982

Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis? - A multicenter observational registry-based study.

Sasha Gulati1, Trond Nordseth, Ulf S Nerland, Michel Gulati, Clemens Weber, Charalampis Giannadakis, Øystein P Nygaard, Tore K Solberg, Ole Solheim, Asgeir S Jakola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limited scientific data on the impact of smoking on patient-reported outcomes following minimally invasive spine surgery. The aim of this multicenter observational study was to examine the relationship between daily smoking and patient-reported outcome at 1 year using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after microdecompression for single- and two-level central lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stays, perioperative and postoperative complications.
METHOD: Data were collected through the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine).
RESULTS: A total of 825 patients were included (619 nonsmokers and 206 smokers). For the whole patient population there was a significant difference between preoperative ODI and ODI at 1 year (17.3 points, 95% CI 15.93-18.67, p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in ODI change at 1 year between nonsmokers and smokers (4.2 points, 95% CI 0.98-7.34, p = 0.010). At 1 year 69.6% of nonsmokers had achieved a minimal clinically important difference (≥10 points ODI improvement) compared to 60.8% of smokers (p = 0.008). There was no difference between nonsmokers and smokers in the overall complication rate (11.6% vs. 9.2%, p = 0.34). There was no difference between nonsmokers and smokers in length of hospital stays for either single-level (2.3 vs. 2.2 days, p = 0.99) or two-level (3.1 vs. 2.3 days, p = 0.175) microdecompression. Smoking was identified as a negative predictor for ODI change in a multiple regression analysis (p = 0.001)
CONCLUSIONS: Nonsmokers experienced a significantly larger improvement at 1 year following microdecompression for LSS compared to smokers. Smokers were less likely to achieve a minimal clinically important difference. However, it should be emphasized that considerable improvement also was found among smokers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25943982     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-015-2437-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  14 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Sara Khor; Danielle Lavallee; Amy M Cizik; Carlo Bellabarba; Jens R Chapman; Christopher R Howe; Dawei Lu; A Alex Mohit; Rod J Oskouian; Jeffrey R Roh; Neal Shonnard; Armagan Dagal; David R Flum
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  The Effect of Tobacco Smoking on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ahmad M Al-Bashaireh; Linda G Haddad; Michael Weaver; Debra Lynch Kelly; Xing Chengguo; Saunjoo Yoon
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2018-07-11

3.  Smoking status and perioperative adverse events in patients undergoing cranial tumor surgery.

Authors:  Luis Padevit; Johannes Sarnthein; Martin Nikolaus Stienen; Niklaus Krayenbühl; Oliver Bozinov; Luca Regli; Marian Christoph Neidert
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Erland Hermansen; Ulla Kristina Romild; Ivar Magne Austevoll; Tore Solberg; Kjersti Storheim; Jens Ivar Brox; Christian Hellum; Kari Indrekvam
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Influence of previous surgery on patient-rated outcome after surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Pascal Zehnder; Emin Aghayev; Tamas F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Tim Pigott; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Concomitant back and leg pain as predictors for trajectories of poor outcome after single level lumbar micro-decompression alone and with micro-discectomy: a study of 3,308 patients.

Authors:  Roberto Carrasco; Mahmoud Elmalky; Silviu Sabou; John Leach; Rajat Verma; Saeed Mohammad; Irfan Siddique
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

7.  Predictors of Long-term Opioid Use Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Joseph Connolly; Zulqarnain Javed; Mukaila A Raji; Winston Chan; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jacques Baillargeon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 8.  The Effects of Smoking and Smoking Cessation on Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Keith L Jackson; John G Devine
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2016-01-15

9.  Does smoking affect the outcomes of lumbar decompression surgery?

Authors:  Radha Mehta; Himanshu Sharma
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-11-22

10.  Does Smoking Affect Short-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes After Lumbar Decompression?

Authors:  Dhruv K C Goyal; Srikanth N Divi; Daniel R Bowles; Victor E Mujica; I David Kaye; Mark F Kurd; Barrett I Woods; Kris E Radcliff; Jeffrey A Rihn; D Greg Anderson; Alan S Hilibrand; Christopher K Kepler; Alexander R Vaccaro; Gregory D Schroeder
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.