Literature DB >> 34477947

Patient-rated outcome after atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusion: more than a decade of evaluation of 2-year outcomes in 126 patients.

F S Kleinstück1, T F Fekete2, M Loibl1, D Jeszenszky1, D Haschtmann1, F Porchet1, A F Mannion3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Various surgical techniques have been introduced for atlantoaxial (C1-C2) fusion, the most common being Magerl's (transarticular) or the Harms/Goel screw fixation. Common indications include degenerative osteoarthritis (OA), trauma or rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Only few, small studies have evaluated patient-reported outcomes after C1-C2 fusion. We investigated 2-year outcomes in a large series of consecutive patients undergoing isolated C1-C2 fusion.
METHODS: We analysed prospectively collected data (2005-2016) from our Spine outcomes database, collected within the framework of EUROSPINE's Spine Tango Registry. It included 126 patients (34 (27%) men, 92 (73%) women; mean (SD) age 67 ± 19 y) who had undergone first-time isolated C1-C2 fusion (61% Magerl, 39% Harms(-Goel)) at least 2 years ago for OA (83 (66%)), RA (20 (16%)), fracture (15 (12%)) or other (8 (6%)). Patients completed the multidimensional Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI; 0-10) and various single item outcomes.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned by 118/126 (94%) patients, 2 years post-operative. Mean COMI scores showed a significant reduction from baseline: 6.9 ± 2.4 to 2.7 ± 2.5 (p < 0.0001). Overall, 75% patients achieved the MCIC of ≥ 2.2 points reduction in COMI and 88% reported a good global outcome. 91% patients were satisfied/very satisfied with their care. Self-reported complications were declared by 16% patients and further surgery at the same segment, by 2.5%.
CONCLUSION: In this large series with almost complete follow-up, C1-C2 fusion showed extremely good results. Despite the complexity of the intervention, outcomes surpassed those typically reported for simple procedures such as ACDF and lumbar discectomy, suggesting reservations about the procedure should perhaps be reviewed.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlantoaxial fusion; Cervical spine C1-2 fusion; Osteoarthritis; Patient-reported outcome; Rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34477947     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06959-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  36 in total

1.  Minimally invasive atlantoaxial fusion.

Authors:  Langston T Holly; Robert E Isaacs; Anthony K Frempong-Boadu
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Minimally invasive anterior transarticular screw fixation and microendoscopic bone graft for atlantoaxial instability.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; ZhengFeng Zhang; ChangQing Li; WenJie Zheng; Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Lateral Atlantoaxial Osteoarthritis: A Narrative Literature Review.

Authors:  Morenikeji A Buraimoh; Lara W Massie; David M Montgomery
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 4.  Craniovertebral junction: biomechanical considerations.

Authors:  Michael P Steinmetz; Thomas E Mroz; Edward C Benzel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Early Morbidity and Mortality in 50 Very Elderly Patients After Posterior Atlantoaxial Fusion for Traumatic Odontoid Fractures.

Authors:  Yu-Mi Ryang; Elisabeth Török; Insa Janssen; Andreas Reinke; Niels Buchmann; Jens Gempt; Florian Ringel; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-12-25       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Clinical outcome of posterior fixation of the C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle by polyaxial screw and rod.

Authors:  Sei Woong Jeon; Je Hoon Jeong; Gi Hoon Choi; Seung Myung Moon; Hyung Sik Hwang; Sun Kil Choi
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 1.876

7.  Prevalence of degenerative changes of the atlanto-axial joints.

Authors:  Marcel W Betsch; Sabina R Blizzard; Matthew S Shinseki; Jung U Yoo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Translaminar screws of the axis--an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability.

Authors:  D Meyer; F Meyer; Th Kretschmer; W Börm
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Upper cervical manipulation combined with mobilization for the treatment of atlantoaxial osteoarthritis: a report of 10 cases.

Authors:  Hong Yu; Shuxun Hou; Wenwen Wu; Xiaohua He
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  The Surgical Treatment Principles of Atlantoaxial Instability Focusing on Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Yu-Tung Shih; Ting-Hsien Kao; Hung-Chuan Pan; Hsien-Te Chen; Hsi-Kai Tsou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  Robot-assisted atlantoaxial fixation: illustrative cases.

Authors:  Amanda N Sacino; Joshua Materi; A Daniel Davidar; Brendan Judy; Ann Liu; Brian Hwang; Nicholas Theodore
Journal:  J Neurosurg Case Lessons       Date:  2022-06-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.