Literature DB >> 26797254

Forensic age estimation via 3-T magnetic resonance imaging of ossification of the proximal tibial and distal femoral epiphyses: Use of a T2-weighted fast spin-echo technique.

Oguzhan Ekizoglu1, Elif Hocaoglu2, Ercan Inci2, Ismail Ozgur Can3, Sema Aksoy2, Cemal Kazimoglu4.   

Abstract

Radiation exposure during forensic age estimation is associated with ethical implications. It is important to prevent repetitive radiation exposure when conducting advanced ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of 3.0-T MRI in determining the degree of ossification of the distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses in a group of Turkish population. We retrospectively evaluated coronal T2-weighted and turbo spin-echo sequences taken upon MRI of 503 patients (305 males, 198 females; age 10-30 years) using a five-stage method. Intra- and interobserver variations were very low. (Intraobserver reliability was κ=0.919 for the distal femoral epiphysis and κ=0.961 for the proximal tibial epiphysis, and interobserver reliability was κ=0.836 for the distal femoral epiphysis and κ=0.885 for the proximal tibial epiphysis.) Spearman's rank correlation analysis indicated a significant positive relationship between age and the extent of ossification of the distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses (p<0.001). Comparison of male and female data revealed significant between-gender differences in the ages at first attainment of stages 2, 3, and 4 ossifications of the distal femoral epiphysis and stage 1 and 4 ossifications of the proximal tibial epiphysis (p<0.05). The earliest ages at which ossification of stages 3, 4, and 5 was evident in the distal femoral epiphysis were 14, 17, and 22 years in males and 13, 16, and 21 years in females, respectively. Proximal tibial epiphysis of stages 3, 4, and 5 ossification was first noted at ages 14, 17, and 18 years in males and 13, 15, and 16 years in females, respectively. MRI of the distal femoral and proximal tibial epiphyses is an alternative, noninvasive, and reliable technique to estimate age.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age estimation; Distal femoral epiphysis; Forensic anthropology population data; Magnetic resonance imaging; Proximal tibial epiphysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26797254     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  6 in total

1.  Forensic age diagnostics by magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal humeral epiphysis.

Authors:  Oguzhan Ekizoglu; Ercan Inci; Suna Ors; Elif Hocaoglu; Ismail Ozgur Can; Can Doruk Basa; Ismail Eralp Kacmaz; Elena F Kranioti
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Forensic age estimation by magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: the definite relevance in bony fusion of the distal femoral- and the proximal tibial epiphyses using closest-to-bone T1 TSE sequence.

Authors:  Christian Ottow; Ronald Schulz; Heidi Pfeiffer; Walter Heindel; Andreas Schmeling; Volker Vieth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of reliability of magnetic resonance imaging using cartilage and T1-weighted sequences in the assessment of the closure of the growth plates at the knee.

Authors:  Ola Ft Kvist; Ana Luiza Dallora; Ola Nilsson; Peter Anderberg; Johan Sanmartin Berglund; Carl-Erik Flodmark; Sandra Diaz
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2020-09-30

4.  Reducing acquisition time for MRI-based forensic age estimation.

Authors:  Bernhard Neumayer; Matthias Schloegl; Christian Payer; Thomas Widek; Sebastian Tschauner; Thomas Ehammer; Rudolf Stollberger; Martin Urschler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Dependency criterion based brain pathological age estimation of Alzheimer's disease patients with MR scans.

Authors:  Yongming Li; Yuchuan Liu; Pin Wang; Jie Wang; Sha Xu; Mingguo Qiu
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  A cross-sectional magnetic resonance imaging study of factors influencing growth plate closure in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Ola Kvist; Ana Luiza Dallora; Ola Nilsson; Peter Anderberg; Johan Sanmartin Berglund; Carl-Erik Flodmark; Sandra Diaz
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.299

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.