| Literature DB >> 33047349 |
Ola Kvist1,2, Ana Luiza Dallora3, Ola Nilsson2,4, Peter Anderberg3, Johan Sanmartin Berglund3, Carl-Erik Flodmark5, Sandra Diaz1,2,6.
Abstract
AIM: To assess growth plate fusion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and evaluate the correlation with sex, age, pubertal development, physical activity and BMI.Entities:
Keywords: growth plate; magnetic resonance imaging; maturation process; obesity; puberty
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33047349 PMCID: PMC7983983 DOI: 10.1111/apa.15617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Paediatr ISSN: 0803-5253 Impact factor: 2.299
Figure 1Each row is one of the five growth plates studied, and each column represents a different stage of closure in our study population. The open arrows in stage 4a and 4b indicate areas where bone bridging is present while the solid white arrows in stage 4c indicate areas where the growth plate still is unfused
Demographic information of the study population by age, sex and BMI ± standard deviation in each subgroup
| Age (yo) | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (N) | 60 | 61 | 60 | 63 | 58 | 60 | 60 | 61 | 477 |
| BMI | 19.8 ± 2.4 | 20.7 ± 2.6 | 21.1 ± 3.2 | 21.4 ± 2.7 | 22.4 ± 4.0 | 22.6 ± 3.4 | 23.5 ± 4.0 | 23.1 ± 4.6 | 21.8 ± 3.6 |
| Female (N) | 62 | 62 | 60 | 60 | 61 | 59 | 57 | 60 | 481 |
| BMI | 21.4 ± 3.5 | 22.1 ± 3.0 | 22.0 ± 2,8 | 22.7 ± 3.7 | 23.5 ± 4.4 | 22.0 ± 3.6 | 22.5 ± 3.6 | 22.8 ± 2.7 | 22.4 ± 3.5 |
| Total | 122 | 123 | 120 | 123 | 119 | 119 | 117 | 121 | 958 |
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; N, number of subjects; yo, years old.
Ratio among subjects with completely closed growth plates (stage 5), by growth plate for males and females in each age group
| Gender | Age | Radius (%) | Femur (%) | Proximal Tibia (%) | Distal Tibia (%) | Calcaneus (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 14 | 0/59 (0) | 0/60 (0) | 0/60 (0) | 3/60 (5.0) | 11/60 (18.3) |
| 15 | 1/59 (1.7) | 0/60 (0) | 2/60 (3.3) | 11/60 (18.3) | 31/59 (52.5) | |
| 16 | 5/60 (8.5) | 10/60 (16.7) | 12/60 (20.0) | 35/60 (58.3) | 46/60 (76.7) | |
| 17 | 15/61 (24.6) | 26/61 (42.6) | 34/61 (55.7) | 54/61 (88.5) | 60/61 (98.4) | |
| 18 | 34/57 (59.6) | 48/58 (82.7) | 50/57 (87.7) | 57/58 (98.3) | 58/58 (100) | |
| 19 | 52/58 (89.7) | 58/60 (96.7) | 57/60 (95.0) | 58/60 (96.7) | 59/60 (98.3) | |
| 20 | 53/54 (98.1) | 54/54 (100) | 54/54 (100) | 52/54 (96.3) | 54/54 (100) | |
| 21 | 59/59 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | |
| Female | 14 | 3/62 (4.8) | 6/62 (9.7) | 12/62 (19.4) | 31/62 (50) | 44/61 (72.1) |
| 15 | 8/60 (13.3) | 25/62 (40.3) | 33/62 (53.2) | 52/62 (83.9) | 56/62 (90.3) | |
| 16 | 26/60 (43.3) | 42/60 (70.0) | 53/60 (88.3) | 55/59 (93.2) | 56/58 (96.6) | |
| 17 | 45/60 (75.0) | 51/60 (85.0) | 58/60 (96.7) | 59/60 (98.3) | 59/60 (98.3) | |
| 18 | 55/61 (90.2) | 59/60 (98.39) | 60/60 (100) | 61/61 (100) | 61/61 (100) | |
| 19 | 57/57 (100) | 58/58 (100) | 58/58 (100) | 58/58 (100) | 58/58 (100) | |
| 20 | 57/57 (100) | 57/57 (100) | 57/57 (100) | 57/57 (100) | 57/57 (100) | |
| 21 | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) | 60/60 (100) |
Spearman correlation matrix for males for all five growth plates as well as Tanner, BMI and physical activity
| Stage Radius | Stage Femur | Stage Prox. Tibia | Stage Dist. Tibia | Stage Calcaneus | Tanner | BMI | Physical Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage Radius | 1.000 |
0.855 <0.001 |
0.838 <0.001 |
0.703 <0.001 |
0.607 <0.001 |
0.596 <0.001 |
0.384 <0.001 |
−0.069 0.135 |
| Stage Femur | 1.000 |
0.908 <0.001 |
0.739 <0.001 |
0.573 <0.001 |
0.0592 <0.001 |
0.368 <0.001 |
−0.049 0.282 | |
| Stage Prox. Tibia | 1.000 |
0.777 <0.001 |
0.667 <0.001 |
0.597 <0.001 |
0.365 <0.001 |
−0.056 0.219 | ||
| Stage Dist. Tibia | 1.000 |
0.788 <0.001 |
0.598 <0.001 |
0.346 <0.001 |
−0.037 0.414 | |||
| Stage Calcaneus | 1.000 |
0.514 <0.001 |
0.308 <0.001 |
−0.058 0.203 | ||||
| Tanner | 1.000 |
0.319 <0.001 |
−0.036 0.436 | |||||
| BMI | 1.000 |
0.041 0.366 | ||||||
| Physical activity | 1.000 |
The table shows whether there is a correlation between two variables and if it is significant.
Spearman correlation matrix for females for all five growth plates as well as Tanner, BMI and physical activity
| Stage Radius | Stage Femur | Stage Prox. Tibia | Stage Dist. Tibia | Stage Calcaneus | Tanner | BMI | Physical Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage Radius | 1.000 |
0.828 <0.001 |
0.759 <0.001 |
0.551 <0.001 |
0.377 <0.001 |
0.513 <0.001 |
0.222 <0.001 |
0.095 <0.05 (0.043) |
| Stage Femur | 1.000 |
0.846 <0.001 |
0.615 <0.001 |
0.431 <0.001 |
0.500 <0.001 |
0.210 <0.001 |
0.043 0.343 | |
| Stage Prox. Tibia | 1.000 |
0.717 <0.001 |
0.496 <0.001 |
0.445 <0.001 |
0.216 <0.001 |
0.019 0.686 | ||
| Stage Dist. Tibia | 1.000 |
0.516 <0.001 |
0.378 <0.001 |
0.219 <0.001 |
0.028 0.542 | |||
| Stage Calcaneus | 1.000 |
0.287 <0.001 |
0.186 <0.001 |
−0.049 0.285 | ||||
| Tanner | 1.000 |
0.261 <0.001 |
−0.026 0.560 | |||||
| BMI | 1.000 |
0.059 0.197 | ||||||
| Physical activity | 1.000 |
The table shows whether there is a correlation between two variables and if it is significant.
Odds ratio after logistic regression model
| Radius | Femur | Proximal Tibia | Distal Tibia | Calcaneus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age |
4.71
|
5.06
|
5.62
|
4.28
|
4.18
|
| Gender |
8.57
|
13.60
|
28.81
|
14.64
|
9.20
|
| BMI |
3.22
|
2.75
|
2.80
|
3.13
|
2.60
|
The model evaluates how much age, gender or BMI affects the odds of an individual to be stage 5 or not.
Conditional logistic regression stratified for age and gender to calculate odds ratios for overweight individuals to be stage 5 in comparison with their peers
| Radius | Femur | Proximal Tibia | Distal Tibia | Calcaneus | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male |
4.03
|
2.45
( |
2.50
( |
2.97
( |
1.71
( |
| Female |
2.65
|
2.73
|
3.02
|
4.23
|
8.71
|