Literature DB >> 30334085

Forensic age diagnostics by magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal humeral epiphysis.

Oguzhan Ekizoglu1, Ercan Inci2, Suna Ors2, Elif Hocaoglu2, Ismail Ozgur Can3, Can Doruk Basa4, Ismail Eralp Kacmaz4, Elena F Kranioti5,6,7.   

Abstract

The most commonly used radiological method for age estimation of living individuals is X-ray. Computed tomography is not commonly used due to high radiation exposure, which raises ethical concerns. This problem can be solved with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which avoids the use of ionizing radiation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the utility of MRI analysis of the proximal humeral epiphyses for forensic age estimations of living individuals. In this study, 395 left proximal humeral epiphyses (patient age 12-30 years) were evaluated with fast-spin-echo proton density-weighted image (FSE PD) sequences in a coronal oblique orientation on shoulder MRI images. A five-stage scoring system was used following the method of Dedouit et al. The intra- and interobserver reliabilities assessed using Cohen's kappa statistic were κ = 0.818 and κ = 0.798, respectively. According to this study, stage five first appeared at 20 and 21 years of age in males and females, respectively. These results are not directly comparable to any other published study due to the lack of MRI data on proximal humeral head development. These findings may provide valuable information for legally important age thresholds using shoulder MRI. The current study demonstrates that MRI of the proximal humerus can support forensic age estimation. Further research is needed to establish a standardized protocol that can be applied worldwide.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age estimation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Proximal humeral epiphysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30334085     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1952-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  41 in total

Review 1.  Age estimation: the state of the art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practise.

Authors:  S Ritz-Timme; C Cattaneo; M J Collins; E R Waite; H W Schütz; H J Kaatsch; H I Borrman
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Effects of ethnicity on skeletal maturation: consequences for forensic age estimations.

Authors:  A Schmeling; W Reisinger; D Loreck; K Vendura; W Markus; G Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Forensic age estimation and ethnicity.

Authors:  Andreas Schmeling; Andreas Olze; Walter Reisinger; Gunther Geserick
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.376

4.  Comparison of ages of epiphyseal union in North American and Bosnian skeletal material.

Authors:  Maureen C Schaefer; Sue M Black
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.832

5.  Age determination by magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in adolescent male football players.

Authors:  Jiri Dvorak; John George; Astrid Junge; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 13.800

6.  Brief communication: infracranial maturation in the skeletal collection from Coimbra, Portugal: new aging standards for epiphyseal union.

Authors:  Hélène Coqueugniot; Timothy D Weaver
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Application of MRI of the wrist for age determination in international U-17 soccer competitions.

Authors:  Jiri Dvorak; John George; Astrid Junge; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  Criteria for age estimation in living individuals.

Authors:  A Schmeling; C Grundmann; A Fuhrmann; H-J Kaatsch; B Knell; F Ramsthaler; W Reisinger; T Riepert; S Ritz-Timme; F W Rösing; K Rötzscher; G Geserick
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 9.  Forensic age diagnostics of living people undergoing criminal proceedings.

Authors:  A Schmeling; A Olze; W Reisinger; G Geserick
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2004-09-10       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the clavicular ossification.

Authors:  Sven Schmidt; Matthias Mühler; Andreas Schmeling; Walter Reisinger; Ronald Schulz
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-04-17       Impact factor: 2.791

View more
  5 in total

1.  Forensic age estimation based on magnetic resonance imaging of the proximal humeral epiphysis in Chinese living individuals.

Authors:  Ting Lu; Li-Rong Qiu; Bo Ren; Lei Shi; Fei Fan; Zhen-Hua Deng
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Estimating forensic age via magnetic resonance imaging of the distal radial epiphysis.

Authors:  Ali Er; Mustafa Bozdag; Can Doruk Basa; Ismail Eralp Kacmaz; Oguzhan Ekizoglu
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  The relevance of body mass index in forensic age assessment of living individuals: an age-adjusted linear regression analysis using multivariable fractional polynomials.

Authors:  Maximilian Timme; André Karch; Denys Shay; Christian Ottow; Andreas Schmeling
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  DENSEN: a convolutional neural network for estimating chronological ages from panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Xuedong Wang; Yanle Liu; Xinyao Miao; Yin Chen; Xiao Cao; Yuchen Zhang; Shuaicheng Li; Qin Zhou
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Forensic age estimation based on fast spin-echo proton density (FSE PD)-weighted MRI of the distal radial epiphysis.

Authors:  Oguzhan Ekizoglu; Ali Er; Mustafa Bozdag; Negahnaz Moghaddam; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.686

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.