Kirsten L Johansen1, Lorien S Dalrymple2, David Glidden3, Cynthia Delgado4, George A Kaysen2, Barbara Grimes3, Glenn M Chertow5. 1. Division of Nephrology and Nephrology Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California; Kirsten.johansen@ucsf.edu. 2. Division of Nephrology, University of California, Davis, California; and. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California; 4. Division of Nephrology and Nephrology Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California; 5. Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Frailty is common among patients on dialysis and increases vulnerability to dependency and death. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined the predictive ability of frailty on the basis of physical performance and self-reported function in participants of a US Renal Data System special study that enrolled a convenience sample of 771 prevalent patients on hemodialysis from 14 facilities in the Atlanta and northern California areas from 2009 to 2011. Performance-based frailty was assessed using direct measures of grip strength (weakness) and gait speed along with weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity; poor self-reported function was substituted for weakness and slow gait speed in the self-reported function-based definition. For both definitions, patients meeting three or more criteria were considered frail. RESULTS: The mean age of 762 patients included in analyses was 57.1±14.2 years old; 240 patients (31%) met the physical performance-based definition of frailty, and 396 (52%) met the self-reported function-based definition. There were 106 deaths during 1.7 (interquartile range, 1.4-2.4) years of follow-up. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for the performance-based definition (2.16; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.41 to 3.29) was slightly higher than that of the self-reported function-based definition (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.00). Patients who met the self-report-based definition but not the physical performance definition of frailty (n=192) were not at statistically significantly higher risk of mortality than those who were not frail by either definition (n=330; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.45), but those who met both definitions of frailty (n=204) were at significantly higher risk (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.51 to 4.01). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, defined using either direct tests of physical performance or self-reported physical function, was associated with higher mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. Future studies are needed to determine the utility of assessing frailty in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Frailty is common among patients on dialysis and increases vulnerability to dependency and death. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We examined the predictive ability of frailty on the basis of physical performance and self-reported function in participants of a US Renal Data System special study that enrolled a convenience sample of 771 prevalent patients on hemodialysis from 14 facilities in the Atlanta and northern California areas from 2009 to 2011. Performance-based frailty was assessed using direct measures of grip strength (weakness) and gait speed along with weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity; poor self-reported function was substituted for weakness and slow gait speed in the self-reported function-based definition. For both definitions, patients meeting three or more criteria were considered frail. RESULTS: The mean age of 762 patients included in analyses was 57.1±14.2 years old; 240 patients (31%) met the physical performance-based definition of frailty, and 396 (52%) met the self-reported function-based definition. There were 106 deaths during 1.7 (interquartile range, 1.4-2.4) years of follow-up. After adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, the hazard ratio (HR) for mortality for the performance-based definition (2.16; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.41 to 3.29) was slightly higher than that of the self-reported function-based definition (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.24 to 3.00). Patients who met the self-report-based definition but not the physical performance definition of frailty (n=192) were not at statistically significantly higher risk of mortality than those who were not frail by either definition (n=330; HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.81 to 2.45), but those who met both definitions of frailty (n=204) were at significantly higher risk (HR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.51 to 4.01). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, defined using either direct tests of physical performance or self-reported physical function, was associated with higher mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis. Future studies are needed to determine the utility of assessing frailty in clinical practice.
Authors: Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas; Catherine Féart; Giovanni Mann; Jose Viña; Somnath Chatterji; Wojtek Chodzko-Zajko; Magali Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand; Howard Bergman; Laure Carcaillon; Caroline Nicholson; Angelo Scuteri; Alan Sinclair; Martha Pelaez; Tischa Van der Cammen; François Beland; Jerome Bickenbach; Paul Delamarche; Luigi Ferrucci; Linda P Fried; Luis Miguel Gutiérrez-Robledo; Kenneth Rockwood; Fernando Rodríguez Artalejo; Gaetano Serviddio; Enrique Vega Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kirsten L Johansen; Lorien S Dalrymple; Cynthia Delgado; George A Kaysen; John Kornak; Barbara Grimes; Glenn M Chertow Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2014-04-30 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Kirsten L Johansen; Lorien S Dalrymple; Cynthia Delgado; George A Kaysen; John Kornak; Barbara Grimes; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Catherine Stehman-Breen; Linda F Fried; Xiao Song; David Siscovick; Linda P Fried; Bruce M Psaty; Anne B Newman Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Megan L Salter; Brian Boyarsky; Luis Gimenez; Bernard G Jaar; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Christine E Haugen; Nadia M Chu; Hao Ying; Fatima Warsame; Courtenay M Holscher; Niraj M Desai; Miranda R Jones; Silas P Norman; Daniel C Brennan; Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang; Jeremy D Walston; Adam W Bingaman; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2019-03-19 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Hao Ying; Israel Olorundare; Elizabeth A King; Christine Haugen; Brian Buta; Alden L Gross; Rita Kalyani; Niraj M Desai; Nabil N Dagher; Bonnie E Lonze; Robert A Montgomery; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Christine E Haugen; Alden Gross; Nadia M Chu; Silas P Norman; Daniel C Brennan; Qian-Li Xue; Jeremy Walston; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.053