John Sy1, Kirsten L Johansen. 1. aDivision of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco bDivision of Nephrology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Frailty is highly prevalent in the dialysis population and is associated with mortality. Recent studies have suggested that other dialysis outcomes are compromised in frail individuals. While we do not yet have a consensus as to the best measure of frailty, identification of these poor outcomes and their magnitude of association with frailty will help improve prognostication, allow for earlier interventions, and improve provider-to-patient communication. RECENT FINDINGS: The most widely used assessment of frailty is Fried's physical performance criteria. However, regardless of assessment method, frailty remains highly associated with mortality. More recently, frailty has been associated with falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, vascular access failure, and poor quality of life. Recent large cohort studies provide strong evidence that frailty assessment can provide important prognostic information for providers and patients both before and after initiation of dialysis. Trials aimed at improving frailty are limited and show the promise of augmenting quality of life, although more studies are needed to firmly establish mortality benefits. SUMMARY: We underscore the importance of frailty as a prognostic indicator and identify other recently established consequences of frailty. Widespread adoption of frailty assessment remains limited and researchers continue to find ways of simplifying the data collection process. Timely and regular assessment of frailty may allow for interventions that can mitigate the onset of poor outcomes and identify actionable targets for dialysis providers.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Frailty is highly prevalent in the dialysis population and is associated with mortality. Recent studies have suggested that other dialysis outcomes are compromised in frail individuals. While we do not yet have a consensus as to the best measure of frailty, identification of these poor outcomes and their magnitude of association with frailty will help improve prognostication, allow for earlier interventions, and improve provider-to-patient communication. RECENT FINDINGS: The most widely used assessment of frailty is Fried's physical performance criteria. However, regardless of assessment method, frailty remains highly associated with mortality. More recently, frailty has been associated with falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, vascular access failure, and poor quality of life. Recent large cohort studies provide strong evidence that frailty assessment can provide important prognostic information for providers and patients both before and after initiation of dialysis. Trials aimed at improving frailty are limited and show the promise of augmenting quality of life, although more studies are needed to firmly establish mortality benefits. SUMMARY: We underscore the importance of frailty as a prognostic indicator and identify other recently established consequences of frailty. Widespread adoption of frailty assessment remains limited and researchers continue to find ways of simplifying the data collection process. Timely and regular assessment of frailty may allow for interventions that can mitigate the onset of poor outcomes and identify actionable targets for dialysis providers.
Authors: Samuel Headley; Michael Germain; Patrick Mailloux; Jeffrey Mulhern; Brian Ashworth; Jami Burris; Britton Brewer; Bradley C Nindl; Bradley Nindl; MaryAnn Coughlin; Robert Welles; Margaret Jones Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kenneth Rockwood; Xiaowei Song; Chris MacKnight; Howard Bergman; David B Hogan; Ian McDowell; Arnold Mitnitski Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-08-30 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Nancy Fugate Woods; Andrea Z LaCroix; Shelly L Gray; Aaron Aragaki; Barbara B Cochrane; Robert L Brunner; Kamal Masaki; Anne Murray; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Manjula Kurella Tamura; Kenneth E Covinsky; Glenn M Chertow; Kristine Yaffe; C Seth Landefeld; Charles E McCulloch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Samuel D Searle; Arnold Mitnitski; Evelyne A Gahbauer; Thomas M Gill; Kenneth Rockwood Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Nadia M Chu; Xiaomeng Chen; Silas P Norman; Jessica Fitzpatrick; Stephen M Sozio; Bernard G Jaar; Alena Frey; Michelle M Estrella; Qian-Li Xue; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev; Mara A McAdams-DeMarco Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Christine E Haugen; Alden Gross; Nadia M Chu; Silas P Norman; Daniel C Brennan; Qian-Li Xue; Jeremy Walston; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Rasheeda K Hall; Sarah Morton; Jonathan Wilson; Dae Hyun Kim; Cathleen Colón-Emeric; Julia J Scialla; Alyssa Platt; Patti L Ephraim; L Ebony Boulware; Jane Pendergast Journal: Kidney360 Date: 2022-07-19