Literature DB >> 31078404

Validation of a New Physical Activity Instrument Against Pedometers Among Dialysis Patients.

Piyawan Kittiskulnam1, Anoop Sheshadri2, Kirsten L Johansen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): The newly developed Low Physical Activity Questionnaire (LoPAQ) was designed to capture the low activity level among typically sedentary patients undergoing dialysis and correlated well with a physical activity questionnaire used in the general population. However, this instrument has not been validated against a more objective measure.
METHODS: We recruited patients receiving dialysis for ≥3 months from 3 dialysis facilities in San Francisco. Spontaneous walking activity was measured by pedometers over 7 days including a weekend and used as the standard reference. Patients were instructed to record their activities and step count readings. Study coordinators administered the LoPAQ during a dialysis session (hemodialysis [HD]) or clinic visit (peritoneal dialysis [PD]). The LoPAQ ascertains time and energy expended in walking activity, as well as light, moderate, and vigorous activity, and total physical activity during a 1-week recall period with 11 simple questions and requires approximately 10 minutes to administer. The LoPAQ also asks about time spent in sitting activities over 1 week. Spearman correlation was used to determine whether the LoPAQ results correlate with step counts.
RESULTS: Sixty dialysis patients (HD = 48, PD = 12) completed the LoPAQ and wore a pedometer for 1 week. Mean age was 58.0 ± 12.7 years, 78.3% were men, and median dialysis vintage was 3.1 (IQR, 1.1-5.8) years. Median step count was 2,630.5 (1,270.7-5,137) steps/day. Most patients (82.8%) reported walking activity around the neighborhood, for transportation, and/or for fitness or pleasure, with a median of 595 (70-1,566.3) kcal/week. Total kilocalories per week of physical activity reported on the LoPAQ were 655 (422.8-2,336.8). Participants reported an average of 5 (3-8) sedentary hours per day. Energy expenditure in walking by the LoPAQ was highly correlated with weekly step counts (rho = 0.53, P < .001). In addition, the overall activity reported on the LoPAQ correlated with weekly pedometer readings (rho = 0.35, P = .01) and did not differ between HD and PD patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The LoPAQ was easier and less time-consuming than previously validated physical activity questionnaires. LoPAQ demonstrated a good correlation with objective pedometer step counts among dialysis patients, similar to other physical activity instruments used in healthier and more active populations.
Copyright © 2019 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31078404      PMCID: PMC6825523          DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.03.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ren Nutr        ISSN: 1051-2276            Impact factor:   3.655


  32 in total

Review 1.  Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: current issues, future directions.

Authors:  S G Trost
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Validation of questionnaires to estimate physical activity and functioning in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  K L Johansen; P Painter; J A Kent-Braun; A V Ng; S Carey; M Da Silva; G M Chertow
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Low level of self-reported physical activity in ambulatory patients new to dialysis.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Glenn M Chertow; Nancy G Kutner; Lorien S Dalrymple; Barbara A Grimes; George A Kaysen
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 10.612

4.  Association of physical activity with mortality in the US dialysis population.

Authors:  Austin G Stack; Donald A Molony; Terry Rives; Jon Tyson; Bhamidipati V R Murthy
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  Physical activity levels in patients on hemodialysis and healthy sedentary controls.

Authors:  K L Johansen; G M Chertow; A V Ng; K Mulligan; S Carey; P Y Schoenfeld; J A Kent-Braun
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.612

6.  Pedometers as a means to increase spontaneous physical activity in chronic hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Michał Nowicki; Katarzyna Murlikiewicz; Marta Jagodzińska
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  Practical guide to measuring physical activity.

Authors:  Louisa G Sylvia; Emily E Bernstein; Jane L Hubbard; Leigh Keating; Ellen J Anderson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Decreased survival among sedentary patients undergoing dialysis: results from the dialysis morbidity and mortality study wave 2.

Authors:  Ann M O'Hare; Katherine Tawney; Peter Bacchetti; Kirsten L Johansen
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure in epidemiological research of chronic diseases.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Pagona Lagiou
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 12.434

10.  Frailty as a novel predictor of mortality and hospitalization in individuals of all ages undergoing hemodialysis.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Megan L Salter; Brian Boyarsky; Luis Gimenez; Bernard G Jaar; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 7.538

View more
  2 in total

1.  Daily Step Counts in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Yibo Ren; Hui Wang; Yan Bai; Liuyan Huang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-17

2.  Effects of intradialytic cycling exercise on daily physical activity, physical fitness, body composition, and clinical parameters in high-volume online hemodiafiltration patients: a pilot randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Nawaporn Assawasaksakul; Worawan Sirichana; Waraporn Joosri; Onanong Kulaputana; Sukanya Eksakulkla; Chutima Ketanun; Piyawan Kittiskulnam; Maythinee Chantadisai; Kullaya Takkavatakarn; Paweena Susantitaphong; Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa; Somchai Eiam-Ong; Khajohn Tiranathanagul
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.370

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.