Kirsten L Johansen1, Lorien S Dalrymple2, Cynthia Delgado3, George A Kaysen2, John Kornak4, Barbara Grimes4, Glenn M Chertow5. 1. United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Nephrology Section, San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA. Electronic address: kirsten.johansen@ucsf.edu. 2. United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; University of California, San Francisco Division of Nephrology, University of California, Davis, CA. 3. United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Nephrology, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Nephrology Section, San Francisco VA Medical Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 4. United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, CA. 5. United States Renal Data System Nutrition Special Studies Center, University of California, San Francisco, CA; Division of Nephrology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility. STUDY DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the classic performance-based definition and developed a modified self-report-based definition. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent adult patients receiving hemodialysis in 14 centers around San Francisco and Atlanta in 2009-2011. INDEX TESTS: Self-report-based frailty definition in which a score lower than 75 on the Physical Function scale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was substituted for gait speed and grip strength in the classic definition; modified self-report definition with optimized Physical Function score cutoff points derived in a development (one-half) cohort and validated in the other half. REFERENCE TEST: Performance-based frailty defined as 3 of the following: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow gait speed. RESULTS: 387 (53%) patients were frail based on self-reported function, of whom 209 (29% of the cohort) met the performance-based definition. Only 23 (3%) met the performance-based definition of frailty only. The self-report definition had 90% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 72.5% overall accuracy. Intracellular water per kilogram of body weight and serum albumin, prealbumin, and creatinine levels were highest among nonfrail individuals, intermediate among those who were frail by self-report, and lowest among those who also were frail by performance. Age, percentage of body fat, and C-reactive protein level followed an opposite pattern. The modified self-report definition had better accuracy (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%) and superior specificity (88%) and positive predictive value (67%). LIMITATIONS: Our study did not address prediction of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who meet the self-report-based but not the performance-based definition of frailty may represent an intermediate phenotype. A modified self-report definition can improve the accuracy of a questionnaire-based method of defining frailty. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: A well-accepted definition of frailty includes measurements of physical performance, which may limit its clinical utility. STUDY DESIGN: In a cross-sectional study, we compared prevalence and patient characteristics based on a frailty definition that uses self-reported function to the classic performance-based definition and developed a modified self-report-based definition. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Prevalent adult patients receiving hemodialysis in 14 centers around San Francisco and Atlanta in 2009-2011. INDEX TESTS: Self-report-based frailty definition in which a score lower than 75 on the Physical Function scale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was substituted for gait speed and grip strength in the classic definition; modified self-report definition with optimized Physical Function score cutoff points derived in a development (one-half) cohort and validated in the other half. REFERENCE TEST: Performance-based frailty defined as 3 of the following: weight loss, weakness, exhaustion, low physical activity, and slow gait speed. RESULTS: 387 (53%) patients were frail based on self-reported function, of whom 209 (29% of the cohort) met the performance-based definition. Only 23 (3%) met the performance-based definition of frailty only. The self-report definition had 90% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 54% positive predictive value, 93% negative predictive value, and 72.5% overall accuracy. Intracellular water per kilogram of body weight and serum albumin, prealbumin, and creatinine levels were highest among nonfrail individuals, intermediate among those who were frail by self-report, and lowest among those who also were frail by performance. Age, percentage of body fat, and C-reactive protein level followed an opposite pattern. The modified self-report definition had better accuracy (84%; 95% CI, 79%-89%) and superior specificity (88%) and positive predictive value (67%). LIMITATIONS: Our study did not address prediction of outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:Patients who meet the self-report-based but not the performance-based definition of frailty may represent an intermediate phenotype. A modified self-report definition can improve the accuracy of a questionnaire-based method of defining frailty. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Ursula G Kyle; Ingvar Bosaeus; Antonio D De Lorenzo; Paul Deurenberg; Marinos Elia; José Manuel Gómez; Berit Lilienthal Heitmann; Luisa Kent-Smith; Jean-Claude Melchior; Matthias Pirlich; Hermann Scharfetter; Annemie M W J Schols; Claude Pichard Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Linda P Fried; Luigi Ferrucci; Jonathan Darer; Jeff D Williamson; Gerard Anderson Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Karen Bandeen-Roche; Qian-Li Xue; Luigi Ferrucci; Jeremy Walston; Jack M Guralnik; Paulo Chaves; Scott L Zeger; Linda P Fried Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Kirsten L Johansen; Lorien S Dalrymple; Cynthia Delgado; George A Kaysen; John Kornak; Barbara Grimes; Glenn M Chertow Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Nancy Fugate Woods; Andrea Z LaCroix; Shelly L Gray; Aaron Aragaki; Barbara B Cochrane; Robert L Brunner; Kamal Masaki; Anne Murray; Anne B Newman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Megan L Salter; Brian Boyarsky; Luis Gimenez; Bernard G Jaar; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Ismay N van Loon; Namiko A Goto; Franciscus T J Boereboom; Michiel L Bots; Marianne C Verhaar; Marije E Hamaker Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: George A Kaysen; Barbara Grimes; Lorien S Dalrymple; Glenn M Chertow; Julie H Ishida; Cynthia Delgado; Mark Segal; Janet Chiang; Tjien Dwyer; Kirsten L Johansen Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Hao Ying; Israel Olorundare; Elizabeth A King; Christine Haugen; Brian Buta; Alden L Gross; Rita Kalyani; Niraj M Desai; Nabil N Dagher; Bonnie E Lonze; Robert A Montgomery; Karen Bandeen-Roche; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: John P Donnelly; Sindhu Lakkur; Suzanne E Judd; Emily B Levitan; Russell Griffin; George Howard; Monika M Safford; Henry E Wang Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 9.079