Literature DB >> 26791945

Biomechanical model for computing deformations for whole-body image registration: A meshless approach.

Mao Li1, Karol Miller1,2, Grand Roman Joldes1, Ron Kikinis3,4, Adam Wittek1.   

Abstract

Patient-specific biomechanical models have been advocated as a tool for predicting deformations of soft body organs/tissue for medical image registration (aligning two sets of images) when differences between the images are large. However, complex and irregular geometry of the body organs makes generation of patient-specific biomechanical models very time-consuming. Meshless discretisation has been proposed to solve this challenge. However, applications so far have been limited to 2D models and computing single organ deformations. In this study, 3D comprehensive patient-specific nonlinear biomechanical models implemented using meshless Total Lagrangian explicit dynamics algorithms are applied to predict a 3D deformation field for whole-body image registration. Unlike a conventional approach that requires dividing (segmenting) the image into non-overlapping constituents representing different organs/tissues, the mechanical properties are assigned using the fuzzy c-means algorithm without the image segmentation. Verification indicates that the deformations predicted using the proposed meshless approach are for practical purposes the same as those obtained using the previously validated finite element models. To quantitatively evaluate the accuracy of the predicted deformations, we determined the spatial misalignment between the registered (i.e. source images warped using the predicted deformations) and target images by computing the edge-based Hausdorff distance. The Hausdorff distance-based evaluation determines that our meshless models led to successful registration of the vast majority of the image features.
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hausdorff distance; meshless methods; meshless model; patient-specific biomechanical modelling; whole-body image registration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26791945      PMCID: PMC4956599          DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  43 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Kemal Tuncali; Fiona M Fennessy; Junichi Tokuda; Nobuhiko Hata; William M Wells; Ron Kikinis; Clare M Tempany
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Patient-specific biomechanical model as whole-body CT image registration tool.

Authors:  Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Barry Doyle; Revanth Reddy Garlapati; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  A novel 3D volumetric voxel registration technique for volume-view-guided image registration of multiple imaging modalities.

Authors:  Guang Li; Huchen Xie; Holly Ning; Jacek Capala; Barbara C Arora; C Norman Coleman; Kevin Camphausen; Robert W Miller
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads.

Authors:  Jacob Rosen; Jeffrey D Brown; Smita De; Mika Sinanan; Blake Hannaford
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Computed tomography assessment of response to therapy: tumor volume change measurement, truth data, and error.

Authors:  Michael F McNitt-Gray; Luc M Bidaut; Samuel G Armato; Charles R Meyer; Marios A Gavrielides; Charles Fenimore; Geoffrey McLennan; Nicholas Petrick; Binsheng Zhao; Anthony P Reeves; Reinhard Beichel; Hyun-Jung Grace Kim; Lisa Kinnard
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Magnetic resonance assessment of response to therapy: tumor change measurement, truth data and error sources.

Authors:  Edward F Jackson; Daniel P Barboriak; Luc M Bidaut; Charles R Meyer
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  Automated medical image segmentation techniques.

Authors:  Neeraj Sharma; Lalit M Aggarwal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-01

10.  Patient-specific computational biomechanics of the brain without segmentation and meshing.

Authors:  Johnny Y Zhang; Grand Roman Joldes; Adam Wittek; Karol Miller
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.747

View more
  3 in total

1.  Modeling Soft Tissue Damage and Failure Using a Combined Particle/Continuum Approach.

Authors:  M K Rausch; G E Karniadakis; J D Humphrey
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-08-18

2.  Computer simulation of tumour resection-induced brain deformation by a meshless approach.

Authors:  Yue Yu; George Bourantas; Benjamin Zwick; Grand Joldes; Tina Kapur; Sarah Frisken; Ron Kikinis; Arya Nabavi; Alexandra Golby; Adam Wittek; Karol Miller
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.747

3.  Automatic framework for patient-specific modelling of tumour resection-induced brain shift.

Authors:  Yue Yu; Saima Safdar; George Bourantas; Benjamin Zwick; Grand Joldes; Tina Kapur; Sarah Frisken; Ron Kikinis; Arya Nabavi; Alexandra Golby; Adam Wittek; Karol Miller
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 6.698

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.