PURPOSE: To provide more clinically useful image registration with improved accuracy and reduced time, a novel technique of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric voxel registration of multimodality images is developed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This technique can register up to four concurrent images from multi-modalities with volume view guidance. Various visualization effects can be applied, facilitating global and internal voxel registration. Fourteen computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) image sets and two computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) image sets are used. For comparison, an automatic registration technique using maximization of mutual information (MMI) and a three-orthogonal-planar (3P) registration technique are used. RESULTS: Visually sensitive registration criteria for CT/MR and CT/PET have been established, including the homogeneity of color distribution. Based on the registration results of 14 CT/MR images, the 3D voxel technique is in excellent agreement with the automatic MMI technique and is indicatory of a global positioning error (defined as the means and standard deviations of the error distribution) using the 3P pixel technique: 1.8 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees in rotation and 2.0 +/- 1.3 (voxel unit) in translation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such positioning error has been addressed. CONCLUSION: This novel 3D voxel technique establishes volume-view-guided image registration of up to four modalities. It improves registration accuracy with reduced time, compared with the 3P pixel technique. This article suggests that any interactive and automatic registration should be safe-guarded using the 3D voxel technique.
PURPOSE: To provide more clinically useful image registration with improved accuracy and reduced time, a novel technique of three-dimensional (3D) volumetric voxel registration of multimodality images is developed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This technique can register up to four concurrent images from multi-modalities with volume view guidance. Various visualization effects can be applied, facilitating global and internal voxel registration. Fourteen computed tomography/magnetic resonance (CT/MR) image sets and two computed tomography/positron emission tomography (CT/PET) image sets are used. For comparison, an automatic registration technique using maximization of mutual information (MMI) and a three-orthogonal-planar (3P) registration technique are used. RESULTS: Visually sensitive registration criteria for CT/MR and CT/PET have been established, including the homogeneity of color distribution. Based on the registration results of 14 CT/MR images, the 3D voxel technique is in excellent agreement with the automatic MMI technique and is indicatory of a global positioning error (defined as the means and standard deviations of the error distribution) using the 3P pixel technique: 1.8 degrees +/- 1.2 degrees in rotation and 2.0 +/- 1.3 (voxel unit) in translation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such positioning error has been addressed. CONCLUSION: This novel 3D voxel technique establishes volume-view-guided image registration of up to four modalities. It improves registration accuracy with reduced time, compared with the 3P pixel technique. This article suggests that any interactive and automatic registration should be safe-guarded using the 3D voxel technique.
Authors: Guang Li; Naveen C Arora; Huchen Xie; Holly Ning; Wei Lu; Daniel Low; Deborah Citrin; Aradhana Kaushal; Leor Zach; Kevin Camphausen; Robert W Miller Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Guang Li; Jie Wei; Hailiang Huang; Qing Chen; Carl P Gaebler; Tiffany Lin; Amy Yuan; Andreas Rimner; James Mechalakos Journal: Med Phys Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Mao Li; Karol Miller; Grand Roman Joldes; Ron Kikinis; Adam Wittek Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Guang Li; T Jonathan Yang; Hugo Furtado; Wolfgang Birkfellner; Åse Ballangrud; Simon N Powell; James Mechalakos Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-09-15
Authors: Guang Li; Huchen Xie; Holly Ning; Deborah Citrin; Jacek Capala; Roberto Maass-Moreno; Peter Guion; Barbara Arora; Norman Coleman; Kevin Camphausen; Robert W Miller Journal: J Appl Clin Med Phys Date: 2008-07-09 Impact factor: 2.102