BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Biased GPCR ligands are able to engage with their target receptor in a manner that preferentially activates distinct downstream signalling and offers potential for next generation therapeutics. However, accurate quantification of ligand bias in vitro is complex, and current best practice is not amenable for testing large numbers of compound. We have therefore sought to apply ligand bias theory to an industrial scale screening campaign for the identification of new biased μ receptor agonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: μ receptor assays with appropriate dynamic range were developed for both Gαi -dependent signalling and β-arrestin2 recruitment. Δlog(Emax /EC50 ) analysis was validated as an alternative for the operational model of agonism in calculating pathway bias towards Gαi -dependent signalling. The analysis was applied to a high throughput screen to characterize the prevalence and nature of pathway bias among a diverse set of compounds with μ receptor agonist activity. KEY RESULTS: A high throughput screening campaign yielded 440 hits with greater than 10-fold bias relative to DAMGO. To validate these results, we quantified pathway bias of a subset of hits using the operational model of agonism. The high degree of correlation across these biased hits confirmed that Δlog(Emax /EC50 ) was a suitable method for identifying genuine biased ligands within a large collection of diverse compounds. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This work demonstrates that using Δlog(Emax /EC50 ), drug discovery can apply the concept of biased ligand quantification on a large scale and accelerate the deliberate discovery of novel therapeutics acting via this complex pharmacology.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Biased GPCR ligands are able to engage with their target receptor in a manner that preferentially activates distinct downstream signalling and offers potential for next generation therapeutics. However, accurate quantification of ligand bias in vitro is complex, and current best practice is not amenable for testing large numbers of compound. We have therefore sought to apply ligand bias theory to an industrial scale screening campaign for the identification of new biased μ receptor agonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: μ receptor assays with appropriate dynamic range were developed for both Gαi -dependent signalling and β-arrestin2 recruitment. Δlog(Emax /EC50 ) analysis was validated as an alternative for the operational model of agonism in calculating pathway bias towards Gαi -dependent signalling. The analysis was applied to a high throughput screen to characterize the prevalence and nature of pathway bias among a diverse set of compounds with μ receptor agonist activity. KEY RESULTS: A high throughput screening campaign yielded 440 hits with greater than 10-fold bias relative to DAMGO. To validate these results, we quantified pathway bias of a subset of hits using the operational model of agonism. The high degree of correlation across these biased hits confirmed that Δlog(Emax /EC50 ) was a suitable method for identifying genuine biased ligands within a large collection of diverse compounds. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This work demonstrates that using Δlog(Emax /EC50 ), drug discovery can apply the concept of biased ligand quantification on a large scale and accelerate the deliberate discovery of novel therapeutics acting via this complex pharmacology.
Authors: John A Allen; Julianne M Yost; Vincent Setola; Xin Chen; Maria F Sassano; Meng Chen; Sean Peterson; Prem N Yadav; Xi-ping Huang; Bo Feng; Niels H Jensen; Xin Che; Xu Bai; Stephen V Frye; William C Wetsel; Marc G Caron; Jonathan A Javitch; Bryan L Roth; Jian Jin Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Xiao-Tao Chen; Philip Pitis; Guodong Liu; Catherine Yuan; Dimitar Gotchev; Conrad L Cowan; David H Rominger; Michael Koblish; Scott M Dewire; Aimee L Crombie; Jonathan D Violin; Dennis S Yamashita Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Guido Boerrigter; David G Soergel; Jonathan D Violin; Michael W Lark; John C Burnett Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Sudarshan Rajagopal; Seungkirl Ahn; David H Rominger; William Gowen-MacDonald; Christopher M Lam; Scott M Dewire; Jonathan D Violin; Robert J Lefkowitz Journal: Mol Pharmacol Date: 2011-05-24 Impact factor: 4.436
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Doriano Fabbro; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Peishen Zhao; TinaMarie Lieu; Nicholas Barlow; Matthew Metcalf; Nicholas A Veldhuis; Dane D Jensen; Martina Kocan; Silvia Sostegni; Silke Haerteis; Vera Baraznenok; Ian Henderson; Erik Lindström; Raquel Guerrero-Alba; Eduardo E Valdez-Morales; Wolfgang Liedtke; Peter McIntyre; Stephen J Vanner; Christoph Korbmacher; Nigel W Bunnett Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2014-08-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Stephen Ph Alexander; Eamonn Kelly; Neil Marrion; John A Peters; Helen E Benson; Elena Faccenda; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; O Peter Buneman; William A Catterall; John A Cidlowski; Anthony P Davenport; Doriano Fabbro; Grace Fan; John C McGrath; Michael Spedding; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Tyler A Johnson; Laura Milan-Lobo; Tao Che; Madeline Ferwerda; Eptisam Lambu; Nicole L McIntosh; Fei Li; Li He; Nicholas Lorig-Roach; Phillip Crews; Jennifer L Whistler Journal: ACS Chem Neurosci Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 4.418
Authors: Kritika Mohan; George Ueda; Ah Ram Kim; Kevin M Jude; Jorge A Fallas; Yu Guo; Maximillian Hafer; Yi Miao; Robert A Saxton; Jacob Piehler; Vijay G Sankaran; David Baker; K Christopher Garcia Journal: Science Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Xin Chen; John D McCorvy; Matthew G Fischer; Kyle V Butler; Yudao Shen; Bryan L Roth; Jian Jin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Eugene S Gutman; Eric Bow; Fuying Li; Agnieszka Sulima; Sophia Kaska; Rachel Crowley; Thomas E Prisinzano; Yong-Sok Lee; Sergio A Hassan; Gregory H Imler; Jeffrey R Deschamps; Arthur E Jacobson; Kenner C Rice Journal: RSC Med Chem Date: 2020-06-12