Literature DB >> 21610196

Quantifying ligand bias at seven-transmembrane receptors.

Sudarshan Rajagopal1, Seungkirl Ahn, David H Rominger, William Gowen-MacDonald, Christopher M Lam, Scott M Dewire, Jonathan D Violin, Robert J Lefkowitz.   

Abstract

Seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), commonly referred to as G protein-coupled receptors, form a large part of the "druggable" genome. 7TMRs can signal through parallel pathways simultaneously, such as through heterotrimeric G proteins from different families, or, as more recently appreciated, through the multifunctional adapters, β-arrestins. Biased agonists, which signal with different efficacies to a receptor's multiple downstream pathways, are useful tools for deconvoluting this signaling complexity. These compounds may also be of therapeutic use because they have distinct functional and therapeutic profiles from "balanced agonists." Although some methods have been proposed to identify biased ligands, no comparison of these methods applied to the same set of data has been performed. Therefore, at this time, there are no generally accepted methods to quantify the relative bias of different ligands, making studies of biased signaling difficult. Here, we use complementary computational approaches for the quantification of ligand bias and demonstrate their application to two well known drug targets, the β2 adrenergic and angiotensin II type 1A receptors. The strategy outlined here allows a quantification of ligand bias and the identification of weakly biased compounds. This general method should aid in deciphering complex signaling pathways and may be useful for the development of novel biased therapeutic ligands as drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21610196      PMCID: PMC3164332          DOI: 10.1124/mol.111.072801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  34 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy in drug receptor theory: outdated concept or under-valued tool?

Authors:  T Kenakin
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 14.819

2.  A modification of receptor theory.

Authors:  R P STEPHENSON
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1956-12

Review 3.  Agonist-receptor efficacy. II. Agonist trafficking of receptor signals.

Authors:  T Kenakin
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 14.819

4.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  A De Lean; J M Stadel; R J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Distinct signaling profiles of beta1 and beta2 adrenergic receptor ligands toward adenylyl cyclase and mitogen-activated protein kinase reveals the pluridimensionality of efficacy.

Authors:  Ségolène Galandrin; Michel Bouvier
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Interaction of beta-adrenergic receptors with the inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding protein of adenylate cyclase in membranes prepared from cyc- S49 lymphoma cells.

Authors:  S N Abramson; M W Martin; A R Hughes; T K Harden; K A Neve; D A Barrett; P B Molinoff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 5.858

7.  Effector coupling mechanisms of the cloned 5-HT1A receptor.

Authors:  A Fargin; J R Raymond; J W Regan; S Cotecchia; R J Lefkowitz; M G Caron
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1989-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Distinct beta-arrestin- and G protein-dependent pathways for parathyroid hormone receptor-stimulated ERK1/2 activation.

Authors:  Diane Gesty-Palmer; Minyong Chen; Eric Reiter; Seungkirl Ahn; Christopher D Nelson; Shuntai Wang; Allen E Eckhardt; Conrad L Cowan; Robert F Spurney; Louis M Luttrell; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-02-21       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Independent beta-arrestin 2 and G protein-mediated pathways for angiotensin II activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2.

Authors:  Huijun Wei; Seungkirl Ahn; Sudha K Shenoy; Sadashiva S Karnik; László Hunyady; Louis M Luttrell; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Effector pathway-dependent relative efficacy at serotonin type 2A and 2C receptors: evidence for agonist-directed trafficking of receptor stimulus.

Authors:  K A Berg; S Maayani; J Goldfarb; C Scaramellini; P Leff; W P Clarke
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  148 in total

Review 1.  Superagonism at G protein-coupled receptors and beyond.

Authors:  R Schrage; A De Min; K Hochheiser; E Kostenis; K Mohr
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Biased ligand quantification in drug discovery: from theory to high throughput screening to identify new biased μ opioid receptor agonists.

Authors:  David Winpenny; Mellissa Clark; Darren Cawkill
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  G Protein-coupled Receptor Biased Agonism.

Authors:  Sima Y Hodavance; Clarice Gareri; Rachel D Torok; Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Practical Strategies and Concepts in GPCR Allosteric Modulator Discovery: Recent Advances with Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors.

Authors:  Craig W Lindsley; Kyle A Emmitte; Corey R Hopkins; Thomas M Bridges; Karen J Gregory; Colleen M Niswender; P Jeffrey Conn
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 5.  Ligand bias prevents class equality among beta-blockers.

Authors:  Vaidehi J Thanawala; Gloria S Forkuo; Wayne Stallaert; Paul Leff; Michel Bouvier; Richard Bond
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.547

6.  Ligand- and cell-dependent determinants of internalization and cAMP modulation by delta opioid receptor (DOR) agonists.

Authors:  Iness Charfi; Karim Nagi; Ouissame Mnie-Filali; Dominic Thibault; Gianfranco Balboni; Peter W Schiller; Louis-Eric Trudeau; Graciela Pineyro
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  Assessment of Biased Agonism among Distinct Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist Scaffolds.

Authors:  Elise Wouters; Jolien Walraed; Michael Joseph Robertson; Max Meyrath; Martyna Szpakowska; Andy Chevigné; Georgios Skiniotis; Christophe Stove
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2019-11-04

8.  Distinct Signaling Patterns of Allosteric Antagonism at the P2Y1 Receptor.

Authors:  Zhan-Guo Gao; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 9.  Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance.

Authors:  John T Williams; Susan L Ingram; Graeme Henderson; Charles Chavkin; Mark von Zastrow; Stefan Schulz; Thomas Koch; Christopher J Evans; Macdonald J Christie
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 25.468

10.  A multiplexed fluorescent assay for independent second-messenger systems: decoding GPCR activation in living cells.

Authors:  Paul H Tewson; Anne Marie Quinn; Thomas E Hughes
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2013-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.