| Literature DB >> 26784968 |
P Lindner1,2, I Savic3,4, R Sitnikov1, M Budhiraja1,2, Y Liu5,6, J Jokinen1,2,7, J Tiihonen1,2,8,9, S Hodgins1,10.
Abstract
The behavioral phenotype and genotype of conduct disorder (CD) differ in males and females. Abnormalities of white matter integrity have been reported among males with CD and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Little is known about white matter integrity in females with CD. The present study aimed to determine whether abnormalities of white matter are present among young women who presented CD before the age of 15, and whether abnormalities are independent of the multiple comorbid disorders and experiences of maltreatment characterizing females with CD that may each in themselves be associated with alterations of the white matter. Three groups of women, aged on average 24 years, were scanned using diffusion tensor imaging and compared: 28 with prior CD, three of whom presented ASPD; a clinical comparison (CC) group of 15 women with no history of CD but with similar proportions who presented alcohol dependence, drug dependence, anxiety disorders, depression disorders and physical and sexual abuse as the CD group; and 24 healthy women. Whole-brain, tract-based spatial statistics were computed to investigate differences in fractional anisotropy, axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity. Compared with healthy women, women with prior CD showed widespread reductions in axial diffusivity primarily in frontotemporal regions. After statistically adjusting for comorbid disorders and maltreatment, group differences in the corpus callosum body and genu (including forceps minor) remained significant. Compared with the CC group, women with CD showed reduced fractional anisotropy in the body and genu of the corpus callosum. No differences were detected between the CD and healthy women in the uncinate fasciculus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26784968 PMCID: PMC5068887 DOI: 10.1038/tp.2015.216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Psychiatry ISSN: 2158-3188 Impact factor: 6.222
Sample characteristics
| Mean (s.d.) age | 24.1 (2.9) | 22.9 (3.4) | 25.2 (1.6) | F(1,50)=1.79, | F(1,41)=1.7, |
| Mean (s.d.) handedness score | 87.6 (33.6) | 73.0 (60.4) | 92.0 (10.3) | W=305, | W=219, |
| Mean (s.d.) verbal IQ | 7.9 (2.3) | 9.5 (1.6) | 8.1 (1.8) | F(1,49)= 7.5, | F(1, 40)=0.09, |
| Mean (s.d.) performance IQ | 8.6 (3) | 9.9 (1.7) | 9.9 (2.6) | F(1,49)=3.46, | F(1, 40)=1.99, |
| % Completed high school | 42.9% | 79.2% | 86.7% | FET | FET |
| Mean (s.d.) number of lifetime max CD symptoms | 6.0 (3.0) | 0 (0) | 0.5 (0.5) | F(1,50)=97, | F(1,41)=50.29, |
| Indication of ADHD | 10.7% | 0% | 0% | FET | FET |
| % Antisocial personality disorder | 12% | 0% | 0% | FET | FET |
| % Alcohol dependence | 46.4% | 0% | 26.7% | FET | FET |
| % Drug dependence | 39.3% | 0% | 20.0% | FET | FET |
| % Any anxiety disorder | 82.1% | 0% | 73.3% | FET | FET |
| % Any depression disorder | 75.0% | 0% | 73.3% | FET | FET |
| % Alcohol dependence | 3.6% | 0% | 0% | FET | FET |
| % Drug dependence | 7.1% | 0% | 0% | FET | FET |
| % Any anxiety disorder | 28.6% | 0% | 13.3% | FET | FET |
| % Any depression disorder | 14.3% | 0% | 0% | FET | FET |
| % Physical abuse by parents | 35.7% | 0% | 20% | FET | FET |
| % Sexual abuse | 64.3% | 0% | 46.7% | FET | FET |
| % Full-time stable occupation last 12 months | 46.2% | 100% | 85.7% | FET | FET |
| % With children | 51.9% | 13% | 26.7% | FET | FET |
| Self-reported aggressive behaviors last 6 months (s.d.) | 0.93 (1.7) | 0.12 (0.5) | 0.13 (0.4) | F(1,50)=5.18, | F(1,41)=3.26, |
Abbreviations: AD, axial diffusivity; ADHD, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder; CC, clinical comparison; CD, conduct disorder; FET, Fisher's exact test; HC, healthy comparison; IQ, intelligence quotient; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; W, Wilcoxon rank sum statistic.
Figure 1Reduced axial diffusivity (AD) in women with conduct disorder (CD) compared with healthy women. Yellow voxels: reduced AD among women with CD compared with healthy women. Red voxels: reduced AD among women with CD after covarying for alcohol dependence, drug dependence, anxiety disorders, depression disorders, physical abuse and sexual abuse (cluster averages graphed). Overlaid on the fractional anisotropy (FA) skeleton (in green) and the mean FA image. AD values scaled by a factor of 104 for sake of presentation.
Figure 2Reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) in women with conduct disorder (CD) compared with those in the clinical comparison group. Right: red voxels show reduced FA among women with CD compared with those in the clinical comparison group. Overlaid on the FA skeleton (in green) and the mean FA image.