| Literature DB >> 32116828 |
Mika Johanson1, Olli Vaurio2,3, Jari Tiihonen1,2,3, Markku Lähteenvuo2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Core psychopathy is characterized by grandiosity, callousness, manipulativeness, and lack of remorse, empathy, and guilt. It is often comorbid with conduct disorder and antisocial personality disorder (ASPD). Psychopathy is present in forensic as well as prison and general populations. In recent years, an increasing amount of neuroimaging studies has been conducted in order to elucidate the obscure neurobiological etiology of psychopathy. The studies have yielded heterogenous results, and no consensus has been reached. AIMS: This study systematically reviewed and qualitatively summarized functional and structural neuroimaging studies conducted on individuals with psychopathic traits. Furthermore, this study aimed to evaluate whether the findings from different MRI modalities could be reconciled from a neuroanatomical perspective.Entities:
Keywords: antisocial; callous-unemotional; emotional detachment; neuroimaging; psychopathy; review
Year: 2020 PMID: 32116828 PMCID: PMC7016047 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 4.157
Figure 1A flowchart of the screening process.
Key neuroanatomical areas affected in psychopathy categorically and dimensionally. The records are grouped by method. Dimensional correlations in terms of total psychopathy score are shown.
| No | Record | Method | AMY | HIP | INS | CG | PFC | TEMP | FUSI | PAR | OCC | CAU | PUT | CB | VS | WMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Baskin-Sommers et al. ( | S | g- | g- | ||||||||||||
|
| Bertsch et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
|
| Boccardi et al. ( | S | m | |||||||||||||
|
| Boccardi et al. ( | S | m | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||
|
| Boccardi et al. ( | S | m | m | ↓g | |||||||||||
|
| Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||
|
| Cope et al. ( | S | g- | g- | g+ | g+ | g- | g- | g+ | |||||||
|
| de Oliveira-Souza et al. ( | S | ↓g | g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ||||||||||
|
| Ermer et al. ( | S | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | |||||||||
|
| Fairchild et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↑g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||
|
| Glenn et al. ( | S | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ||||||||||||
|
| Gregory et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
|
| Howner et al. ( | S | ↓g- | |||||||||||||
|
| Korponay et al. ( | S | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ||||||||||||
|
| Korponay et al. ( | S | ↑g+ | |||||||||||||
|
| Laakso et al. ( | S | ↓g | |||||||||||||
|
| Leutgeb et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↑g | ↑g | |||||||||||
|
| Ly et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||
|
| Miskovich et al. ( | S | m- | m- | m- | |||||||||||
|
| Müller et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | |||||||||||
|
| Pardini et al. ( | S | ↓g- | |||||||||||||
|
| Raine et al. ( | S | ↑w CR, CC | |||||||||||||
|
| Raine et al. ( | S | m | |||||||||||||
|
| Sato et al. ( | S | ↓g- | ↓g- | ↓g- | |||||||||||
|
| Tiihonen et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↑w | ↑g | ||||||
|
| Vieira et al. ( | S | ↓g- | ↑g+ | ↑g+ | ↓g- | ||||||||||
|
| Yang et al. ( | S | ↓g | |||||||||||||
|
| Yang et al. ( | S | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ↓g | ||||||||||
|
| Anderson et al. ( | F | a+ | a+ | a+/− | |||||||||||
|
| Bjork et al. ( | F | a+ | |||||||||||||
|
| Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | F | ↓a | ↑a | ↓c | ↓c | ↑a | |||||||||
|
| Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | F | ↓c | ↓c | ↑c | |||||||||||
|
| Cope et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a− | a− | a− | ↑a | ↑a− | ↑a | |||||
|
| Decety et al. ( | F | ↑a+/− | ↑a | ↑a+/− | ↑a | ↑a | |||||||||
|
| Decety et al. ( | F | ↑a+ | ↑a− | ↑a+/− | ↑a+/− | ↑a+/− | |||||||||
|
| Decety et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑a+ | ↑a− | a− | ↑a− | a− | ↑a− | a− | ||||||
|
| Deeley et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | |||||||
|
| Deming et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑↓a | ↑a | ↑↓a | ||||||||||
|
| Ewbank et al. ( | F | ↓a | c− | ||||||||||||
|
| Fede et al. ( | F | a− | a− | ||||||||||||
|
| Geurts et al. ( | F | ↑c | ↑a | ||||||||||||
|
| Glenn et al. ( | F | a+ | a+/− | a+/− | a+/− | ||||||||||
|
| Gregory et al. ( | F | ↑a+ | ↓a | ↑a | |||||||||||
|
| Harenski et al. ( | F | a− | a− | ↑a | |||||||||||
|
| Harenski et al. ( | F | a− | av | ||||||||||||
|
| Hosking et al. ( | F | cv | c− | ||||||||||||
|
| Hyde et al. ( | F | a− | |||||||||||||
|
| Juárez et al. ( | F | c− | c+/− | c+/− | c+/− | c+/− | c− | ||||||||
|
| Kiehl et al. ( | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | ||||||||
|
| Korponay et al. ( | F | c− | c− | ||||||||||||
|
| Larson et al. ( | F | ↓a | ↑a | ||||||||||||
|
| Lindner et al. ( | F | c+ | c+ | c+ | c+ | ||||||||||
|
| Marsh & Cardinale ( | F | a− | a− | a+ | a− | ||||||||||
|
| Mier et al. ( | F | ↓c | ↓c | ↓a | |||||||||||
|
| Motzkin et al. ( | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | |||||||||||
|
| Müller et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑↓a | ↑a | |||||
|
| Osumi et al. ( | F | c− | c− | a− | a− | c− | c− | ||||||||
|
| Pera-Guardiola et al. ( | F | ↓g | |||||||||||||
|
| Philippi et al. ( | F | ↓c− | ↓c− | ↓c− | |||||||||||
|
| Pujara et al. ( | F | a+/− | |||||||||||||
|
| Pujol et al. ( | F | ↓a | ↓a− | ↓a | a− | ↓a | |||||||||
|
| Rilling et al. ( | F | ↓a− | a+/− | ||||||||||||
|
| Shao and Lee ( | F | ↓a | ↓a | ↓a | |||||||||||
|
| Sommer et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑a | ↑a | |||||||||||
|
| Vieira et al. ( | F | ↑a | ↑a | ||||||||||||
|
| Yoder et al. ( | F | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↑a+ | ↑a+ | ↑↓a+/− | ↑a+ | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↓a− | ↑a+ | ↓a− | ||
|
| Zijlmans et al. ( | F | a+ | a+ | ||||||||||||
|
| Hoppenbrouwers et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA UF | |||||||||||||
|
| Motzkin et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA UF | |||||||||||||
|
| Sethi et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA CG- | |||||||||||||
|
| Sobhani et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA UF- | |||||||||||||
|
| Sundram et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA & ↑MD CC | |||||||||||||
|
| Wolf et al. ( | DTI | ↓FA UF- |
AMY, amygdala; HIP, hippocampus including parahippocampal gyri; INS, insula; CG, cingulate gyrus including cingulate cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; TEMP, temporal cortex; FUSI, fusiform gyrus; PAR, parietal cortex; OCC, occipital cortex; PUT, putamen; CAU, caudate; CB, cerebellum; VS, ventral striatum including nucleus accumbens; WMT, white matter tract; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CC, corpus callosum; CG, cingulum; CR, corona radiata; IC, internal capsule; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; ILF, inferior longitudinal fasciculus; PTR, posterior thalamic radiation; UF, uncinate fasciculus; S, structural; F, functional; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; up-and down-arrow denote increase or decrease, respectively; c, functional connectivity; a, activity; g, gray matter volume; w, white matter volume; plus and minus signs denote direction of relationship with psychopathy.
Key neuroanatomical regions and their correlation to interpersonal-affective dimensions of psychopathy only.
| No | Record | Method | AMY | HIP | INS | ACC | PFC | TEMP | CB | DS | WMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 52 | Baskin-Sommers et al. ( | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 93 | Cohn et al. ( | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | S | g- | g- | g- | g- | g- | ||||
| 38 | Cope et al. ( | S | g+ | g- | g- | g+ | |||||
| 85 | de Oliveira-Souza et al. ( | S | g- | g- | g- | ||||||
| 16 | Fairchild et al. ( | S | g- | ||||||||
| 48 | Glenn et al. ( | S | g+ | ||||||||
| 105 | Howner et al. ( | S | g- | ||||||||
| 45 | Korponay et al. ( | S | g+ | ||||||||
| 86 | Lam et al. ( | S | g- | g- | |||||||
| 12 | Leutgeb et al. ( | S | g- | g+ | |||||||
| 53 | Miskovich et al. ( | S | m- | ||||||||
| 60 | Pardini et al. ( | S | g- | ||||||||
| 78 | Vieira et al. ( | S | g- | g+ | |||||||
| 59 | Yang et al. ( | S | g- | ||||||||
| 28 | Anderson et al. ( | F | a+ | a+ | |||||||
| 79 | Anderson et al. ( | F | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | a− | ||
| 27 | Cohn et al. ( | F | c+ | ||||||||
| 30 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | F | a+ | ||||||||
| 40 | Contreras-Rodríguez et al. ( | F | c+ | ||||||||
| 83 | Cope et al. ( | F | a+ | a+ | a+ | a+ | |||||
| 6 | Decety et al. ( | F | a− | a− | a+/− | a+ | |||||
| 14 | Decety et al. ( | F | a+ | a+ | a+/− | a+/− | |||||
| 71 | Decety et al. ( | F | a+ | a+/− | a− | ||||||
| 97 | Freeman et al. ( | F | a+ | ||||||||
| 77 | Fullam et al. ( | F | av | ||||||||
| 9 | Glenn et al. ( | F | a+ | a+/− | |||||||
| 56 | Harenski et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 64 | Harenski et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 31 | Hosking et al. ( | F | c− | ||||||||
| 10 | Lindner et al. ( | F | c+ | c+ | |||||||
| 94 | Murray et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 54 | Philippi et al. ( | F | c− | ||||||||
| 69 | Schiffer et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 72 | Seara-Cardoso et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 7 | Seara-Cardoso et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 35 | Vieira et al. ( | F | a− | ||||||||
| 5 | Yoder et al. ( | F | c− | c− | a− | a− | |||||
| 70 | Yoder et al. ( | F | a− | a+ | a+ | a− | a+ | ||||
| 65 | Zijlmans et al. ( | F | a− | a− | |||||||
| 102 | Hoppenbrouwers et al. ( | DTI | FA UF- | ||||||||
| 80 | Pape et al. ( | DTI | AD CT+ | ||||||||
| 37 | Sethi et al. ( | DTI | FA CG- | ||||||||
| 49 | Wolf et al. ( | DTI | FA UF- |
AMY, amygdala; HIP, hippocampus including parahippocampal gyri; INS, insula; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex (including parts of middle and posterior cingulate cortex); PFC, prefrontal cortex; TEMP, temporal cortex including fusiform gyrus; CB, cerebellum; DS, dorsal striatum; WMT, white matter tract; ATR, anterior thalamic radiation; CG, cingulum; CT, corticospinal tract; IFOF, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; UF, uncinate fasciculus; S, structural; F, functional; DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; c, functional connectivity; a, activity; g, gray matter volume; plus and minus signs denote direction of relationship with core psychopathy.
Figure 2Coding and analyzing processes. ASPD, antisocial personality disorder; CD, conduct disorders; DTI, diffusion tensor MRI; fMRI, functional MRI; sMRI, structural MRI.
Figure 3A heuristic anatomical map of brain regions correlating with interpersonal-affective dimensions of psychopathy with lateral and medial views ( ). The purpose of the figure is to provide an insight into anatomical localizations. To preserve readability, some of the regions are omitted or are present only on the other hemisphere. The visualization was done with the BrainNet Viewer [(107) http://www.nitrc.org/projects/bnv/]. The regions of interest were obtained from the Automated Anatomic Labeling Atlas (108).
Key dissimilarities and similarities between core psychopathy and ASPD.
| Setting/Characteristic | Core psychopathy | ASPD |
|---|---|---|
| CU traits/Emotional dectachment | Always | Often comorbid |
| Empathy compensation with executive brain regions | Yes | Yes |
| Facial emotion recognition | Amygdalar hyporeactivity | Amygdala hyperreactivity |
| Emotion recognition ability | Diminished | Normal |
| Response to punishment | Increased activity in limbic/paralimbic areas | Decreased activity in limbic/paralimbic areas |
| Decreased GMV in limbic/paralimbic areas | Yes | Yes |
| MAOA -related | No | Yes |
| Hereditary | Highly | Moderately |
| Aggression | Proactive/instrumental | Reactive |
| Notably negative emotionality | No | Yes |
| WMT aberrancies | Decreased FA in the UF | Decreased FA in the UF |
| DMN dysfunction | Yes | Yes |
CU, callous-unemotional; FA, fractional anisotropy; GMV, gray matter volume; MAOA, monoamine oxidase A; UF, uncinate fasciculus; WMT, white matter tract.