| Literature DB >> 26784202 |
Ajay Kumar Yagati1,2, Jinsoo Park3, Sungbo Cho4,5.
Abstract
Insulin is a key regulator in glucose homeostasis and its deficiency or alternations in the human body causes various types of diabetic disorders. In this paper, we present the development of a reduced graphene oxide (rGO) modified interdigitated chain electrode (ICE) for direct capacitive detection of insulin. The impedance properties of rGO-ICE were characterized by equivalent circuit modeling. After an electrochemical deposition of rGO on ICE, the electrode was modified with self-assembled monolayers and insulin antibodies in order to achieve insulin binding reactions. The impedance spectra and capacitances were measured with respect to the concentrations of insulin and the capacitance change (ΔC) was analyzed to quantify insulin concentration. The antibody immobilized electrode showed an increment of ΔC according to the insulin concentration in human serum ranging from 1 ng/mL to 10 µg/mL. The proposed sensor is feasible for label-free and real-time measuring of the biomarker and for point-of-care diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: capacitive biosensor; graphene oxide; impedance spectroscopy; insulin; interdigitated electrode
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26784202 PMCID: PMC4732142 DOI: 10.3390/s16010109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1(a) Optical images of the fabricated interdigitated chain electrode (ICE) on a glass substrate attached with a polydimethylsiloxane chamber; (b,c) phase contrast micrographs of the bare and reduced graphene oxide (rGO) deposited on the sensing electrode of ICE respectively; scale bar is 100 µm; (d) SEM image of rGO deposited ICE and (e) shows the magnified view of the surface structure on one of its electrode arm.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of the preparation process for rGO-ICE based insulin sensor.
Figure 3Impedance magnitude of (a) bare ICE; (b) rGO-ICE and phase of (c) bare ICE; (d) rGO-ICE measured with respect to the concentration of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (Data), and lines fitted using the equivalent circuit model (Fit) consisting of the solution resistance (Rs), the constant phase element for the electrode interfacial impedance (CPE) and the dielectric capacitance of the solution (CDE).
Extrapolated values of the equivalent circuit elements from the fitting results in Figure 3.
| Electrode | RS [Ω] | CPE | CDE [×10−12 F] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T [×10−9 Ω−1 sP] | P | ||||
| Bare-ICE | 0.1 | 13104 ± 439.5 | 6.256 ± 0.265 | 0.901 ± 0.006 | 53.92 ± 2.205 |
| 0.3 | 6329 ± 247.85 | 6.96 ± 0.347 | 0.900 ± 0.007 | 55.8 ± 3.46 | |
| 0.5 | 4616 ± 177.07 | 6.908 ± 0.331 | 0.901 ± 0.006 | 56.79 ± 3.879 | |
| 1 | 3038 ± 107.43 | 6.789 ± 0.298 | 0.915 ± 0.005 | 59.31 ± 4.577 | |
| 5 | 1671 ± 43.82 | 7.070 ± 0.216 | 0.923 ± 0.004 | 67.48 ± 5.0678 | |
| 10 | 1481 ± 40.995 | 6.249 ± 0.20 | 0.942 ± 0.004 | 68.78 ± 5.973 | |
| 100 | 1235 ± 47.21 | 6.267 ± 0.275 | 0.954 ± 0.005 | 74.13 ± 9.766 | |
| rGO-ICE | 0.1 | 17571 ± 382.02 | 168.0 ± 7.575 | 0.812 ± 0.009 | 53.91 ± 1.833 |
| 0.3 | 7896 ± 169.28 | 164.5 ± 6.857 | 0.824 ± 0.008 | 56.33 ± 2.316 | |
| 0.5 | 5832 ± 126.34 | 158.9 ± 6.566 | 0.833 ± 0.007 | 58.19 ± 2.660 | |
| 1 | 4106 ± 85.78 | 151.7 ± 5.974 | 0.852 ± 0.007 | 61.0 ± 3.088 | |
| 5 | 2656 ± 41.0 | 144.1 ± 4.23 | 0.882 ± 0.005 | 64.6 ± 3.02 | |
| 10 | 2384 ± 35.4 | 140.5 ± 3.969 | 0.890 ± 0.004 | 66.75 ± 3.138 | |
| 100 | 2003 ± 33.38 | 140.4 ± 4.389 | 0.898 ± 0.005 | 69.5 ± 3.99 | |
Figure 4(a) Reactive capacitance and (b) resistance of the impedance data measured in 10 mM PBS solution (pH 7.0) according to the preparation process for rGO-ICE based insulin sensor.
Figure 5(a) Normalized capacitance () measured with respect to the concentration of insulin diluted in PBS; (b) at 4.7 kHz for insulin concentrations ranging from 1 ng/mL to 10 µg/mL.
Figure 6(a) Normalized capacitance () measured with respect to the concentration of insulin diluted in human serum (); (b) at 4.7 kHz for insulin concentrations ranging from 1 ng/mL to 10 µg/mL.
Comparison of the response characteristics of different modified electrodes for insulin detection.
| Electrode | Method | Linear Range (nM) | Detection Limit (nM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2NPs-Nafion/GCE a | DPV | 10–50 | 2.8 | [ |
| NiNPs/ITO | CA | 1–125 | 0.01 | [ |
| EDA b-CNFs c-NiO | CA | 20–1020 | 12.1 | [ |
| SPE d/MWCNT e/NiONPs f | CA | 20–260 | 6.1 | [ |
| CNT-NiCoO2/Nafion | CA | 17.2–5430 | 37.93 | [ |
| GCE/CNT | CV | 3.45–68.97 | 1.34 | [ |
| Guanine/NiOxNPs/GCE | CA | 100–1000 | 0.022 | [ |
| Ni(OH)2–GN g/GCE | CA | 800–6400 | 200 | [ |
| rGO/ITO | EIS | 0.17–172.4 | 0.086 | This work |
a Glassy Carbon Electrode; b Ethylenediamine; c Carbon Nanofibers; d Screen Printed Electrode; e Multi-walled Carbon nanotube; f Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles; g Graphene Nanocomposite.