BACKGROUND: Circulating insulin concentrations reflect the amount of endogenous insulin produced by the pancreas and can be monitored to check for insulin resistance. Insulin is commonly measured using immunochemiluminometric assays (ICMA). Unfortunately, differing crossreactivities of the various ICMA antibodies have led to variability in assay results. In contrast, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based approaches can provide a highly specific alternative to immunoassays. METHODS: Insulin was extracted from patient serum and reduced to liberate the insulin B chain. Subsequent resolution of the peptide was achieved by LC coupled to triple-quadrupole MS. Selected-reaction monitoring of B-chain transitions was used for quantification. Recombinant human insulin was used as a calibrator and was compared against the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) reference standard. Bovine insulin and a stable isotopic-labeled ((13)C/(15)N) human insulin B chain were used and compared as internal standards. RESULTS: The LC-MS/MS assay described herein has been validated according to CLIA guidelines with a limit of detection of 1.8 μIU/mL (10.8 pmol/L) and a limit of quantitation of 3 μIU/mL (18.0 pmol/L). A correlation between the LC-MS/MS assay and a US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICMA was completed for patient samples and the resulting Deming regression revealed good agreement. A reference interval for the assay was established. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, high-throughput, quantitative LC-MS/MS insulin assay traceable to the NIBSC standard has been successfully developed and validated.
BACKGROUND: Circulating insulin concentrations reflect the amount of endogenous insulin produced by the pancreas and can be monitored to check for insulin resistance. Insulin is commonly measured using immunochemiluminometric assays (ICMA). Unfortunately, differing crossreactivities of the various ICMA antibodies have led to variability in assay results. In contrast, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based approaches can provide a highly specific alternative to immunoassays. METHODS:Insulin was extracted from patient serum and reduced to liberate the insulin B chain. Subsequent resolution of the peptide was achieved by LC coupled to triple-quadrupole MS. Selected-reaction monitoring of B-chain transitions was used for quantification. Recombinant humaninsulin was used as a calibrator and was compared against the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) reference standard. Bovineinsulin and a stable isotopic-labeled ((13)C/(15)N) humaninsulin B chain were used and compared as internal standards. RESULTS: The LC-MS/MS assay described herein has been validated according to CLIA guidelines with a limit of detection of 1.8 μIU/mL (10.8 pmol/L) and a limit of quantitation of 3 μIU/mL (18.0 pmol/L). A correlation between the LC-MS/MS assay and a US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICMA was completed for patient samples and the resulting Deming regression revealed good agreement. A reference interval for the assay was established. CONCLUSIONS: A simple, high-throughput, quantitative LC-MS/MS insulin assay traceable to the NIBSC standard has been successfully developed and validated.
Authors: Fahim Abbasi; David Feldman; Michael P Caulfield; Feras M Hantash; Gerald M Reaven Journal: Am J Hypertens Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 2.689
Authors: Fahim Abbasi; Christine Blasey; David Feldman; Michael P Caulfield; Feras M Hantash; Gerald M Reaven Journal: J Nutr Date: 2015-03-04 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Andrew N Hoofnagle; Jeffrey R Whiteaker; Steven A Carr; Eric Kuhn; Tao Liu; Sam A Massoni; Stefani N Thomas; R Reid Townsend; Lisa J Zimmerman; Emily Boja; Jing Chen; Daniel L Crimmins; Sherri R Davies; Yuqian Gao; Tara R Hiltke; Karen A Ketchum; Christopher R Kinsinger; Mehdi Mesri; Matthew R Meyer; Wei-Jun Qian; Regine M Schoenherr; Mitchell G Scott; Tujin Shi; Gordon R Whiteley; John A Wrobel; Chaochao Wu; Brad L Ackermann; Ruedi Aebersold; David R Barnidge; David M Bunk; Nigel Clarke; Jordan B Fishman; Russ P Grant; Ulrike Kusebauch; Mark M Kushnir; Mark S Lowenthal; Robert L Moritz; Hendrik Neubert; Scott D Patterson; Alan L Rockwood; John Rogers; Ravinder J Singh; Jennifer E Van Eyk; Steven H Wong; Shucha Zhang; Daniel W Chan; Xian Chen; Matthew J Ellis; Daniel C Liebler; Karin D Rodland; Henry Rodriguez; Richard D Smith; Zhen Zhang; Hui Zhang; Amanda G Paulovich Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Dylan J Harney; Amy T Hutchison; Zhiduan Su; Luke Hatchwell; Leonie K Heilbronn; Samantha Hocking; David E James; Mark Larance Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2019-07-15 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Ernesto S Nakayasu; Marina Gritsenko; Paul D Piehowski; Yuqian Gao; Daniel J Orton; Athena A Schepmoes; Thomas L Fillmore; Brigitte I Frohnert; Marian Rewers; Jeffrey P Krischer; Charles Ansong; Astrid M Suchy-Dicey; Carmella Evans-Molina; Wei-Jun Qian; Bobbie-Jo M Webb-Robertson; Thomas O Metz Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 17.021
Authors: Matthew J Donohue; Robert T Filla; Daniel J Steyer; Wesley J Eaton; Michael G Roper Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2020-12-15 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: Richard G Kay; Peter Barker; Keith Burling; Mark Cohen; David Halsall; Frank Reimann; Fiona M Gribble; Robert K Semple; David Church Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.327