Literature DB >> 21653483

Herbarium specimens demonstrate earlier flowering times in response to warming in Boston.

Daniel Primack1, Carolyn Imbres, Richard B Primack, Abraham J Miller-Rushing, Peter Del Tredici.   

Abstract

Museum specimens collected in the past may be a valuable source of information on the response of species to climate change. This idea was tested by comparing the flowering times during the year 2003 of 229 living plants growing at the Arnold Arboretum in Boston, Massachusetts, USA, with 372 records of flowering times from 1885 to 2002 using herbarium specimens of the same individual plants. During this period, Boston experienced a 1.5°C increase in mean annual temperature. Flowering times became progressively earlier; plants flowered 8 d earlier from 1980 to 2002 than they did from 1900 to 1920. Most of this shift toward earlier flowering times is explained by the influence of temperature, especially temperatures in the months of February, March, April, and May, on flowering time. Plants with a long flowering duration appear to be as useful for detecting responses to changing temperatures as plants with a short flowering duration. Additional studies using herbarium specimens to detect responses to climate change could examine specimens from specific, intensively collected localities, such as mountain peaks, islands, and unique habitats.

Year:  2004        PMID: 21653483     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.8.1260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  53 in total

1.  Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Ignasi Bartomeus; John S Ascher; David Wagner; Bryan N Danforth; Sheila Colla; Sarah Kornbluth; Rachael Winfree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Digital herbarium archives as a spatially extensive, taxonomically discriminate phenological record; a comparison to MODIS satellite imagery.

Authors:  Isaac W Park
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 3.  Genetic and physiological bases for phenological responses to current and predicted climates.

Authors:  A M Wilczek; L T Burghardt; A R Cobb; M D Cooper; S M Welch; J Schmitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  A 250-year index of first flowering dates and its response to temperature changes.

Authors:  Tatsuya Amano; Richard J Smithers; Tim H Sparks; William J Sutherland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Michael W Holmes; Talisin T Hammond; Guinevere O U Wogan; Rachel E Walsh; Katie LaBarbera; Elizabeth A Wommack; Felipe M Martins; Jeremy C Crawford; Katya L Mack; Luke M Bloch; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Bias in phenology assessments based on first appearance data of butterflies.

Authors:  Arco J van Strien; Willem F Plantenga; Leo L Soldaat; Chris A M van Swaay; Michiel F Wallisdevries
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Incipient allochronic speciation due to non-selective assortative mating by flowering time, mutation and genetic drift.

Authors:  Céline Devaux; Russell Lande
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Changing pollen types/concentrations/distribution in the United States: fact or fiction?

Authors:  Estelle Levetin; Peter Van de Water
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.806

9.  Reproductive system of a mixed-mating plant responds to climate perturbation by increased selfing.

Authors:  N T Jones; B C Husband; A S MacDougall
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Cranberry flowering times and climate change in southern Massachusetts.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Ellwood; Susan R Playfair; Caroline A Polgar; Richard B Primack
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 3.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.