Literature DB >> 31685611

Extended high-frequency hearing enhances speech perception in noise.

Lina Motlagh Zadeh1,2, Noah H Silbert2, Katherine Sternasty3, De Wet Swanepoel4, Lisa L Hunter3,2,5, David R Moore3,5,6.   

Abstract

Young healthy adults can hear tones up to at least 20 kHz. However, clinical audiometry, by which hearing loss is diagnosed, is limited at high frequencies to 8 kHz. Evidence suggests there is salient information at extended high frequencies (EHFs; 8 to 20 kHz) that may influence speech intelligibility, but whether that information is used in challenging listening conditions remains unknown. Difficulty understanding speech in noisy environments is the most common concern people have about their hearing and usually the first sign of age-related hearing loss. Digits-in-noise (DIN), a widely used test of speech-in-noise perception, can be sensitized for detection of high-frequency hearing loss by low-pass filtering the broadband masking noise. Here, we used standard and EHF audiometry, self-report, and successively higher cutoff frequency filters (2 to 8 kHz) in a DIN test to investigate contributions of higher-frequency hearing to speech-in-noise perception. Three surprising results were found. First, 74 of 116 "normally hearing," mostly younger adults had some hearing loss at frequencies above 8 kHz. Early EHF hearing loss may thus be an easily measured, preventive warning to protect hearing. Second, EHF hearing loss correlated with self-reported difficulty hearing in noise. Finally, even with the broadest filtered noise (≤8 kHz), DIN hearing thresholds were significantly better (P < 0.0001) than those using broadband noise. Sound energy above 8 kHz thus contributes to speech perception in noise. People with "normal hearing" frequently report difficulty hearing in challenging environments. Our results suggest that one contribution to this difficulty is EHF hearing loss.

Entities:  

Keywords:  digits-in-noise test; high-frequency hearing; listening in noise; pure-tone audiometry; self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31685611      PMCID: PMC6876232          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1903315116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  Digit speech recognition thresholds (SRT) for non-native speakers of English.

Authors:  Ishara Ramkissoon; Adele Proctor; Charissa R Lansing; Robert C Bilger
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  The French digit triplet test: a hearing screening tool for speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  Sofie Jansen; Heleen Luts; Kirsten Carola Wagener; Bruno Frachet; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.

Authors:  G A MILLER; G A HEISE; W LICHTEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-05

4.  Extended high-frequency audiometry (9,000-20,000 Hz). Usefulness in audiological diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Rodríguez Valiente; Amaya Roldán Fidalgo; Ithzel M Villarreal; José R García Berrocal
Journal:  Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp       Date:  2015-05-27

5.  A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Cas Smits; Charles S Watson; Gary R Kidd; David R Moore; S Theo Goverts
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  A pilot investigation of high-frequency audiometry in obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD) patients.

Authors:  G M Shaw; C A Jardine; P Fridjhon
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1996-08

7.  Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.

Authors:  Catherine C Rieke; Odile H Clavier; Lindsay V Allen; Allison P Anderson; Chris A Brooks; Abigail M Fellows; Douglas S Brungart; Jay C Buckey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Van Summers; Matthew J Makashay; Sarah M Theodoroff; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  A review of the perceptual effects of hearing loss for frequencies above 3 kHz.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.117

10.  Automated screening for high-frequency hearing loss.

Authors:  Marcel S M G Vlaming; Robert C MacKinnon; Marije Jansen; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  32 in total

1.  Linking anatomical and physiological markers of auditory system degeneration with behavioral hearing assessments in a mouse (Mus musculus) model of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Anastasiya Kobrina; Katrina M Schrode; Laurel A Screven; Hamad Javaid; Madison M Weinberg; Garrett Brown; Ryleigh Board; Dillan F Villavisanis; Micheal L Dent; Amanda M Lauer
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Pre- and Post-operative Speech Audiometry Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Otitis Media.

Authors:  Aleksandra Boron; Jacek Skladzien; Maciek Wiatr
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 1.017

3.  Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.

Authors:  Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Noah H Silbert; Katherine Sternasty; David R Moore
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 4.  Objective evidence of temporal processing deficits in older adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Hanin Karawani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Envelope following responses predict speech-in-noise performance in normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Anita M Mepani; Sarah Verhulst; Kenneth E Hancock; Markus Garrett; Viacheslav Vasilkov; Kara Bennett; Victor de Gruttola; M Charles Liberman; Stéphane F Maison
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Peripheral deficits and phase-locking declines in aging adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Rebecca Bieber; Alanna Schloss
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Listening Difficulties in Children With Normal Audiograms: Relation to Hearing and Cognition.

Authors:  Lauren Petley; Lisa L Hunter; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Hannah J Stewart; Nicholette T Sloat; Audrey Perdew; Li Lin; David R Moore
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Computational Audiology: New Approaches to Advance Hearing Health Care in the Digital Age.

Authors:  Jan-Willem A Wasmann; Cris P Lanting; Wendy J Huinck; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Jeroen W M van der Laak; Paul J Govaerts; De Wet Swanepoel; David R Moore; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Noise Disturbance and Potential Hearing Loss Due to Exposure of Dental Equipment in Flemish Dentists.

Authors:  Michael Dierickx; Suzanne Verschraegen; Els Wierinck; Guy Willems; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Extended high frequency hearing and speech perception implications in adults and children.

Authors:  Lisa L Hunter; Brian B Monson; David R Moore; Sumitrajit Dhar; Beverly A Wright; Kevin J Munro; Lina Motlagh Zadeh; Chelsea M Blankenship; Samantha M Stiepan; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.