| Literature DB >> 26754531 |
Hongliang Wang1,2, Ganghua Tang3, Kongzhen Hu4, Tingting Huang4, Xiang Liang4, Zhifang Wu5, Sijin Li5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the properties and feasibility of the glucose analog, 2-(18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG), three short (18)F-labeled carboxylic acids, (18)F-fluoroacetate ((18)F-FAC), 2-(18)F-fluoropropionic acid ((18)F-FPA) and 4-((18)F)fluorobenzoic acid ((18)F-FBA), for differentiating tumors from inflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26754531 PMCID: PMC4709996 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-016-0110-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Imaging ISSN: 1471-2342 Impact factor: 1.930
Fig. 1The biodistributions of 18F-FAC (a), 18F-FPA (b) and 18F-FBA (c) in normal Kunming mice
Fig. 2PET images of S180 fibrosarcoma-bearing mice model (the up two rows) and sterile inflammation mice model (the below two rows) with 18F-FDG, 18F-FAC, 18F-FPA and 18F-FBA at 60 min postinjection. Four short white lines indicate the location of tumor or inflammatory lesion areas, respectively
Accumulation comparison of 18F-FAC, 18F-FPA, 18F-FBA and 18F-FDG (3.7 MBq in saline) in model mice (n = 3)
| 18F-FDG | 18F-FAC | 18F-FPA | 18F-FBA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blooda | 0.72 ± 0.18 | 3.36 ± 1.66 | 4.35 ± 1.09 | 0.05 ± 0.01 |
| Musclea | 1.06 ± 0.47 | 3.73 ± 0.53 | 3.87 ± 0.42 | 0.22 ± 0.02 |
| Tumora | 6.67 ± 1.13 | 6.12 ± 1.76 | 6.51 ± 1.28 | 0.63 ± 0.10 |
| Inflammationa | 4.11 ± 1.96 | 5.10 ± 0.33 | 4.62 ± 0.33 | 0.31 ± 0.04 |
| Tumor-to-Bloodb | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 1.82 ± 0.45 | 1.50 ± 0.36 | 12.60 ± 2.12 |
| Inflammation-to-Blood | 1.03 ± 0.14 | 1.52 ± 0.21 | 1.06 ± 0.26 | 6.20 ± 1.06 |
| Tumor-to-Muscle | 6.30 ± 0.69 | 1.70 ± 0.16 | 1.80 ± 0.19 | 2.76 ± 0.25 |
| Inflammation-to-Muscle | 3.87 ± 0.61 | 1.42 ± 0.13 | 1.38 ± 0.13 | 1.40 ± 0.13 |
| Tumor-to-Inflammation | 1.63 ± 0.28 | 1.20 ± 0.38 | 1.41 ± 0.33 | 1.98 ± 0.15* |
| SI (Blood)c | 1.76 ± 0.23 | 1.59 ± 0.12 | 8.00 ± 1.37* | 2.23 ± 0.34 |
| SI (Muscle)d | 1.84 ± 0.17 | 1.74 ± 0.16 | 3.52 ± 0.13* | 3.72 ± 0.06* |
aValues were presented as % ID/g (mean ± SD)
bDefined as (Tumor uptake)/(Blood uptake)
cDefined as (Tumor uptake − Blood uptake)/ (Inflammation uptake − Blood uptake), that is, Tu/Inf ratio corrected for blood background activity
dTu/Inf ratio corrected for Muscle background activity
*p < 0.05, vs. the ratios for 18F-FDG
Fig. 3Microscopic histological examination of a specimen excised from tumor and inflammation in mice. A specimen of mice tumor (a), 10 days after inoculation of S-180 cells and the mice inflammatory muscle (b), 72 h after injection of turpentine oil (all specimens were stained by hematoxylin and eosin and magnified by × 400)