Literature DB >> 26754263

Association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and prostate cancer aggressiveness in the Spanish population.

L A Henríquez-Hernández1,2,3, A Valenciano2, P Foro-Arnalot4, M J Álvarez-Cubero5,6, J M Cozar7, J F Suárez-Novo8, M Castells-Esteve8, P Fernández-Gonzalo9, B De-Paula-Carranza9, M Ferrer10, F Guedea11, G Sancho-Pardo12, J Craven-Bartle12, M J Ortiz-Gordillo13, P Cabrera-Roldán13, J I Rodríguez-Melcón1,2, E Herrera-Ramos14,15, C Rodríguez-Gallego14, P C Lara1,2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Novel predictors of prognosis and treatment response for prostate cancer (PCa) are required to better individualize treatment. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in four genes directly (XRCC5 (X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 5) and XRCC6 (X-ray repair complementing defective repair in Chinese hamster cells 6)) or indirectly (PARP1 and major vault protein (MVP)) involved in non-homologous end joining were examined in 494 Spanish PCa patients.
METHODS: A total of 22 SNPs were genotyped in a Biotrove OpenArray NT Cycler. Clinical tumor stage, diagnostic PSA serum levels and Gleason score at diagnosis were obtained for all participants. Genotypic and allelic frequencies were determined using the web-based environment SNPator.
RESULTS: (XRCC6) rs2267437 appeared as a risk factor for developing more aggressive PCa tumors. Those patients carrying the GG genotype were at higher risk of developing bigger tumors (odds ratio (OR)=2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-3.29, P=0.004), present higher diagnostic PSA levels (OR=2.12, 95% CI 1.19-3.78, P=0.011), higher Gleason score (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.01-2.68, P=0.044) and D'Amico higher risk tumors (OR=2.38, 95% CI 1.24-4.58, P=0.009) than those patients carrying the CC/CG genotypes. Those patients carrying the (MVP) rs3815824 TT genotype were at higher risk of presenting higher diagnostic PSA levels (OR=4.74, 95% CI 1.40-16.07, P=0.013) than those patients carrying the CC genotype. When both SNPs were analyzed in combination, those patients carrying the risk genotypes were at higher risk of developing D'Amico higher risk tumors (OR=3.33, 95% CI 1.56-7.17, P=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: We believe that for the first time, genetic variants at XRCC6 and MVP genes are associated with risk of more aggressive disease, and would be taken into account when assessing the malignancy of PCa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26754263     DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2015.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  47 in total

Review 1.  The cellular response to general and programmed DNA double strand breaks.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2004 Aug-Sep

Review 2.  Poly-ADP-ribose polymerase: machinery for nuclear processes.

Authors:  Colin Thomas; Alexei V Tulin
Journal:  Mol Aspects Med       Date:  2013-04-25

3.  The role of common variants of non-homologous end-joining repair genes XRCC4, LIG4 and Ku80 in thyroid cancer risk.

Authors:  Bruno Costa Gomes; Susana Nunes Silva; Ana Paula Azevedo; Isabel Manita; Octávia Monteiro Gil; Teresa Cruz Ferreira; Edward Limbert; José Rueff; Jorge Francisco Gaspar
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Impaired nonhomologous end-joining provokes soft tissue sarcomas harboring chromosomal translocations, amplifications, and deletions.

Authors:  N E Sharpless; D O Ferguson; R C O'Hagan; D H Castrillon; C Lee; P A Farazi; S Alson; J Fleming; C C Morton; K Frank; L Chin; F W Alt; R A DePinho
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Impact on response and survival of DNA repair single nucleotide polymorphisms in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with thalidomide.

Authors:  María Teresa Cibeira; Carlos Fernández de Larrea; Alfons Navarro; Tania Díaz; Dolors Fuster; Natalia Tovar; Laura Rosiñol; Mariano Monzó; Joan Bladé
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.156

6.  Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) has a controlling role in homologous recombination.

Authors:  Niklas Schultz; Elena Lopez; Nasrollah Saleh-Gohari; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  MVP expression is related to IGF1-R in cervical carcinoma patients treated by radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Marta Lloret; Pedro Carlos Lara; Elisa Bordón; Agustin Rey; Orlando Falcón; Rosa Maria Apolinario; Bernardino Clavo; Ana Ruiz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Major vault protein may affect nonhomologous end-joining repair and apoptosis through Ku70/80 and bax downregulation in cervical carcinoma tumors.

Authors:  Marta Lloret; Pedro Carlos Lara; Elisa Bordón; Fausto Fontes; Agustin Rey; Beatriz Pinar; Orlando Falcón
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  MVP and vaults: a role in the radiation response.

Authors:  Pedro C Lara; Martin Pruschy; Martina Zimmermann; Luis Alberto Henríquez-Hernández
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor: an evolving paradigm in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jingsong Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  DNA Damage Response in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew J Schiewer; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Tissue-based biomarkers in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy N Clinton; Aditya Bagrodia; Yair Lotan; Vitaly Margulis; Ganesh V Raj; Solomon L Woldu
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2017-09-05

Review 3.  The Role of the Core Non-Homologous End Joining Factors in Carcinogenesis and Cancer.

Authors:  Brock J Sishc; Anthony J Davis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  An Integrative Genomics Approach for Associating Genome-Wide Association Studies Information With Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Phenotypes.

Authors:  Chindo Hicks; Ritika Ramani; Oliver Sartor; Ritu Bhalla; Lucio Miele; Zodwa Dlamini; Njabulo Gumede
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2017-03-16

5.  XRCC5/6 polymorphisms and their interactions with smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep satisfaction in breast cancer risk: A Chinese multi-center study.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Yu; Li-Yuan Liu; Yu-Juan Xiang; Fei Wang; Fei Zhou; Shu-Ya Huang; Chao Zheng; Chun-Miao Ye; Wen-Zhong Zhou; Geng-Shen Yin; Jia-Lin Zhang; Shu-De Cui; Fu-Guo Tian; Zhi-Min Fan; Cui-Zhi Geng; Xu-Chen Cao; Zhen-Lin Yang; Xiang Wang; Hong Liang; Shu Wang; Hong-Chuan Jiang; Xue-Ning Duan; Hai-Bo Wang; Guo-Lou Li; Qi-Tang Wang; Jian-Guo Zhang; Feng Jin; Jin-Hai Tang; Liang Li; Shi-Guang Zhu; Wen-Shu Zuo; Zhong-Bing Ma; Zhi-Gang Yu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Machine-Learning-Based m5C Score for the Prognosis Diagnosis of Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Haijie Zhang; Peipei Xu; Yichang Song
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Repair-Assisted Damage Detection Reveals Biological Disparities in Prostate Cancer between African Americans and European Americans.

Authors:  Kimiko L Krieger; Jie H Gohlke; Kevin J Lee; Danthasinghe Waduge Badrajee Piyarathna; Patricia D Castro; Jeffrey A Jones; Michael M Ittmann; Natalie R Gassman; Arun Sreekumar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Relationship between XPD, RAD51, and APEX1 DNA repair genotypes and prostate cancer risk in the male population of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Authors:  Ana Sheila Cypriano; Gilda Alves; Antonio Augusto Ornellas; José Scheinkman; Renata Almeida; Luciano Scherrer; Claudia Lage
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 1.771

9.  Transcriptional signature of lymphoblastoid cell lines of BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-BRCA1/2 high risk breast cancer families.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Pouliot; Charu Kothari; Charles Joly-Beauparlant; Yvan Labrie; Geneviève Ouellette; Jacques Simard; Arnaud Droit; Francine Durocher
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.