K S Kendler1, H Ohlsson2, K Sundquist2, J Sundquist2. 1. Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,VA,USA. 2. Center for Primary Health Care Research,Lund University,Malmö,Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although drug abuse (DA) is strongly familial, with important genetic influences, we need to know more about the role of rearing environment in the risk for DA. To address this question, we utilized a high-risk adopted and non-adopted co-sibling control design. METHOD: High-risk offspring had one or more biological parents registered for DA, alcohol use disorders or criminal behavior. Using Swedish registries, we identified 1161 high-risk full-sibships and 3085 high-risk half-sibships containing at least one member who was adopted-away and one member who was not. Registration for DA was via national criminal, medical and pharmacy registers. In Sweden, adoptive families are screened to provide high-quality rearing environment for adoptees. RESULTS: Controlling for parental age at birth and gender (and, in half-siblings, high-risk status of the other parent), risk for DA was substantially lower in the full- and half-siblings who were adopted v. not adopted [hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals: 0.55 (0.45-0·69) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.48-0.63), respectively]. The protective effect of adoption on risk for DA was significantly stronger in the full- and half-sibling pairs with very high familial liability (two high-risk parents) and significantly weaker when the adoptive family was broken by death or divorce, or contained a high-risk parent. CONCLUSIONS: In both full- and half-sibling pairs, we found replicated evidence that rearing environment strongly impacts on risk for DA. High-quality rearing environments can substantively reduce risk for DA in those at high genetic risk.
BACKGROUND: Although drug abuse (DA) is strongly familial, with important genetic influences, we need to know more about the role of rearing environment in the risk for DA. To address this question, we utilized a high-risk adopted and non-adopted co-sibling control design. METHOD: High-risk offspring had one or more biological parents registered for DA, alcohol use disorders or criminal behavior. Using Swedish registries, we identified 1161 high-risk full-sibships and 3085 high-risk half-sibships containing at least one member who was adopted-away and one member who was not. Registration for DA was via national criminal, medical and pharmacy registers. In Sweden, adoptive families are screened to provide high-quality rearing environment for adoptees. RESULTS: Controlling for parental age at birth and gender (and, in half-siblings, high-risk status of the other parent), risk for DA was substantially lower in the full- and half-siblings who were adopted v. not adopted [hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals: 0.55 (0.45-0·69) and 0.55 (95% CI 0.48-0.63), respectively]. The protective effect of adoption on risk for DA was significantly stronger in the full- and half-sibling pairs with very high familial liability (two high-risk parents) and significantly weaker when the adoptive family was broken by death or divorce, or contained a high-risk parent. CONCLUSIONS: In both full- and half-sibling pairs, we found replicated evidence that rearing environment strongly impacts on risk for DA. High-quality rearing environments can substantively reduce risk for DA in those at high genetic risk.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adoption; cross-generational transmission; drug abuse; rearing
Authors: M T Tsuang; M J Lyons; S A Eisen; J Goldberg; W True; N Lin; J M Meyer; R Toomey; S V Faraone; L Eaves Journal: Am J Med Genet Date: 1996-09-20
Authors: K R Merikangas; M Stolar; D E Stevens; J Goulet; M A Preisig; B Fenton; H Zhang; S S O'Malley; B J Rounsaville Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1998-11
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Sara L Lönn; Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Jan Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Alexis C Edwards; Sara Larsson Lönn; Jan Sundquist; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe; Sara L Lönn; Won K Cook; Kenneth S Kendler; Kristina Sundquist Journal: Health Place Date: 2018-01-12 Impact factor: 4.078
Authors: Leslie D Leve; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Gordon T Harold; Misaki N Natsuaki; Brendan J M Bohannan; William A Cresko Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2018-01