Literature DB >> 26752632

A quantitative understanding of lac repressor's binding specificity and flexibility.

Zheng Zuo1, Yiming Chang1, Gary D Stormo1.   

Abstract

Lac repressor, the first discovered transcriptional regulator, has been shown to confer multiple-modes of binding to its operator sites depending on the central spacer length. Other homolog members in the LacI/GalR family (PurR and YcjW) cannot bind their operator sites with similar structural flexibility. To decipher the underlying mechanism for this unique property, we used Spec-seq approach combined with site-directed mutagenesis to quantify the DNA binding specificity of multiple hybrids of lacI and PurR. We find that lac repressor's recognition di-residues YQ and its hinge helix loop regions are both critical for its structural flexibility. Also, specificity profiling of the whole lac operator suggests that a simple additive model from single variants suffice to predict other multivariant sites' energy reasonably well, and the genome occupancy model based on this specificity data correlates well with in vivo lac repressor binding profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spec-seq; binding flexibility; ionic strength; lac repressor

Year:  2015        PMID: 26752632      PMCID: PMC4704127          DOI: 10.1007/s40484-015-0044-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Biol        ISSN: 2095-4689


  23 in total

1.  Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins.

Authors:  F JACOB; J MONOD
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1961-06       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Toward an integrated model of protein-DNA recognition as inferred from NMR studies on the Lac repressor system.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Biochemistry. Completing the view of transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Peter H von Hippel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The lac repressor.

Authors:  Mitchell Lewis
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.583

5.  A systems approach to measuring the binding energy landscapes of transcription factors.

Authors:  Sebastian J Maerkl; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Interpretation of monovalent and divalent cation effects on the lac repressor-operator interaction.

Authors:  M T Record; P L deHaseth; T M Lohman
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1977-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 7.  DNA looping in prokaryotes: experimental and theoretical approaches.

Authors:  Axel Cournac; Jacqueline Plumbridge
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  High-resolution specificity from DNA sequencing highlights alternative modes of Lac repressor binding.

Authors:  Zheng Zuo; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Modeling the specificity of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Quant Biol       Date:  2013-06

10.  Crystal structure of the lactose operon repressor and its complexes with DNA and inducer.

Authors:  M Lewis; G Chang; N C Horton; M A Kercher; H C Pace; M A Schumacher; R G Brennan; P Lu
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Quantitative specificity of STAT1 and several variants.

Authors:  Basab Roy; Zheng Zuo; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.

Authors:  Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Deep representation learning improves prediction of LacI-mediated transcriptional repression.

Authors:  Alexander S Garruss; Katherine M Collins; George M Church
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  Lactose repressor hinge domain independently binds DNA.

Authors:  Joseph S Xu; Madeleine N Hewitt; Jaskeerat S Gulati; Matthew A Cruz; Hongli Zhan; Shirley Liu; Kathleen S Matthews
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Mapping DNA sequence to transcription factor binding energy in vivo.

Authors:  Stephanie L Barnes; Nathan M Belliveau; William T Ireland; Justin B Kinney; Rob Phillips
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Quantitative profiling of BATF family proteins/JUNB/IRF hetero-trimers using Spec-seq.

Authors:  Yiming K Chang; Zheng Zuo; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.946

7.  Measuring quantitative effects of methylation on transcription factor-DNA binding affinity.

Authors:  Zheng Zuo; Basab Roy; Yiming Kenny Chang; David Granas; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 14.136

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.