Literature DB >> 25209146

High-resolution specificity from DNA sequencing highlights alternative modes of Lac repressor binding.

Zheng Zuo1, Gary D Stormo2.   

Abstract

Knowing the specificity of transcription factors is critical to understanding regulatory networks in cells. The lac repressor-operator system has been studied for many years, but not with high-throughput methods capable of determining specificity comprehensively. Details of its binding interaction and its selection of an asymmetric binding site have been controversial. We employed a new method to accurately determine relative binding affinities to thousands of sequences simultaneously, requiring only sequencing of bound and unbound fractions. An analysis of 2560 different DNA sequence variants, including both base changes and variations in operator length, provides a detailed view of lac repressor sequence specificity. We find that the protein can bind with nearly equal affinities to operators of three different lengths, but the sequence preference changes depending on the length, demonstrating alternative modes of interaction between the protein and DNA. The wild-type operator has an odd length, causing the two monomers to bind in alternative modes, making the asymmetric operator the preferred binding site. We tested two other members of the LacI/GalR protein family and find that neither can bind with high affinity to sites with alternative lengths or shows evidence of alternative binding modes. A further comparison with known and predicted motifs suggests that the lac repressor may be unique in this ability and that this may contribute to its selection.
Copyright © 2014 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  lac repressor; protein–DNA interaction; specificity by sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25209146      PMCID: PMC4224169          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.170100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  72 in total

Review 1.  DNA binding sites: representation and discovery.

Authors:  G D Stormo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Engineered disulfide linking the hinge regions within lactose repressor dimer increases operator affinity, decreases sequence selectivity, and alters allostery.

Authors:  C M Falcon; K S Matthews
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-12-25       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Plasticity in protein-DNA recognition: lac repressor interacts with its natural operator 01 through alternative conformations of its DNA-binding domain.

Authors:  Charalampos G Kalodimos; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Roberto K Salinas; Rainer Wechselberger; Rolf Boelens; Robert Kaptein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 4.  Determining the specificity of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Gary D Stormo; Yue Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Compact, universal DNA microarrays to comprehensively determine transcription-factor binding site specificities.

Authors:  Michael F Berger; Anthony A Philippakis; Aaron M Qureshi; Fangxue S He; Preston W Estep; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-09-24       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  Lambda repressor recognizes the approximately 2-fold symmetric half-operator sequences asymmetrically.

Authors:  A Sarai; Y Takeda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Analysis of the sequence-specific interactions between Cro repressor and operator DNA by systematic base substitution experiments.

Authors:  Y Takeda; A Sarai; V M Rivera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Multiplexed massively parallel SELEX for characterization of human transcription factor binding specificities.

Authors:  Arttu Jolma; Teemu Kivioja; Jarkko Toivonen; Lu Cheng; Gonghong Wei; Martin Enge; Mikko Taipale; Juan M Vaquerizas; Jian Yan; Mikko J Sillanpää; Martin Bonke; Kimmo Palin; Shaheynoor Talukder; Timothy R Hughes; Nicholas M Luscombe; Esko Ukkonen; Jussi Taipale
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A modified bacterial one-hybrid system yields improved quantitative models of transcription factor specificity.

Authors:  Ryan G Christensen; Ankit Gupta; Zheng Zuo; Lawrence A Schriefer; Scot A Wolfe; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Combining SELEX with quantitative assays to rapidly obtain accurate models of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Jiajian Liu; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  21 in total

1.  Quantitatively predictable control of Drosophila transcriptional enhancers in vivo with engineered transcription factors.

Authors:  Justin Crocker; Garth R Ilsley; David L Stern
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  How affinity of the ELT-2 GATA factor binding to cis-acting regulatory sites controls Caenorhabditis elegans intestinal gene transcription.

Authors:  Brett R Lancaster; James D McGhee
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  A quantitative understanding of lac repressor's binding specificity and flexibility.

Authors:  Zheng Zuo; Yiming Chang; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-30

4.  Systematic in vitro profiling of off-target affinity, cleavage and efficiency for CRISPR enzymes.

Authors:  Liyang Zhang; H Tomas Rube; Christopher A Vakulskas; Mark A Behlke; Harmen J Bussemaker; Miles A Pufall
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Transcription factor-DNA binding: beyond binding site motifs.

Authors:  Sachi Inukai; Kian Hong Kock; Martha L Bulyk
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Response Element Composition Governs Correlations between Binding Site Affinity and Transcription in Glucocorticoid Receptor Feed-forward Loops.

Authors:  Sarah K Sasse; Zheng Zuo; Vineela Kadiyala; Liyang Zhang; Miles A Pufall; Mukesh K Jain; Tzu L Phang; Gary D Stormo; Anthony N Gerber
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Quantitative profiling of selective Sox/POU pairing on hundreds of sequences in parallel by Coop-seq.

Authors:  Yiming K Chang; Yogesh Srivastava; Caizhen Hu; Adam Joyce; Xiaoxiao Yang; Zheng Zuo; James J Havranek; Gary D Stormo; Ralf Jauch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Quantitative specificity of STAT1 and several variants.

Authors:  Basab Roy; Zheng Zuo; Gary D Stormo
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Bayesian Markov models consistently outperform PWMs at predicting motifs in nucleotide sequences.

Authors:  Matthias Siebert; Johannes Söding
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The Non-continuum Nature of Eukaryotic Transcriptional Regulation.

Authors:  Gregory M K Poon
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.