Literature DB >> 26750336

Quantifying Parsimony in Structural Equation Modeling.

Kristopher J Preacher.   

Abstract

Fitting propensity (FP) is defined as a model's average ability to fit diverse data patterns, all else being equal. The relevance of FP to model selection is examined in the context of structural equation modeling (SEM). In SEM it is well known that the number of free model parameters influences FP, but other facets of FP are routinely excluded from consideration. It is shown that models possessing the same number of free parameters but different structures may exhibit different FPs. The consequences of this fact are demonstrated using illustrative examples and models culled from published research. The case is made that further attention should be given to quantifying FP in SEM and considering it in model selection. Practical approaches are suggested.

Year:  2006        PMID: 26750336     DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  16 in total

1.  Individual differences in object recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Andrew J Tomarken; Mackenzie A Sunday; Timothy J Vickery; Kaitlin F Ryan; R Jackie Floyd; David Sheinberg; Alan C-N Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The Psychometric Performance of the PROMIS Smoking Assessment Toolkit: Comparisons of Real-Data Computer Adaptive Tests, Short Forms, and Mode of Administration.

Authors:  Brian D Stucky; Wenjing Huang; Maria Orlando Edelen
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  A Penalized Likelihood Method for Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang; Hung Chen; Li-Jen Weng
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Po-Hsien Huang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales.

Authors:  Frederick L Oswald; Amy Shaw; William L Farmer
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-12-24

6.  Recognition memory models and binary-response ROCs: a comparison by minimum description length.

Authors:  David Kellen; Karl Christoph Klauer; Arndt Bröder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-08

7.  Individual Attitudes toward Deviant Behavior and Perceived Attitudes of Friends: Self-stereotyping and Social Projection in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood.

Authors:  Daniel Seddig
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2019-09-16

8.  The Role of Giving and Receiving Emotional Support on Depressive Symptomatology among Older Couples: An Application of the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.

Authors:  Linda K Ko; Megan A Lewis
Journal:  J Soc Pers Relat       Date:  2011-02

9.  Information processes mediate the effect of a health communication intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Authors:  Linda K Ko; Marci K Campbell; Megan A Lewis; Jo Anne Earp; Brenda Devellis
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2011-03

10.  Comparing within-person effects from multivariate longitudinal models.

Authors:  Sierra A Bainter; Andrea L Howard
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2016-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.