Literature DB >> 29880999

Comparing Simple Scoring With IRT Scoring of Personality Measures: The Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales.

Frederick L Oswald1, Amy Shaw1, William L Farmer2.   

Abstract

This article analyzes data from U.S. Navy sailors (N = 8,956), with the central measure being the Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS). Analyses and results from this article extend and qualify those from previous research efforts by examining the properties of the NCAPS and its adaptive structure in more detail. Specifically, this article examines item exposure rates, the efficiency of item use based on item response theory (IRT)-based Expected A Posteriori (EAP) scoring, and a comparison of IRT-EAP scoring with much more parsimonious scoring methods that appear to work just as well (stem-level scoring and dichotomous scoring). The cutting-edge nature of adaptive personality testing will necessitate a series of future efforts like this: to examine the benefits of adaptive scoring schemes and novel measurement methods continually, while pushing testing technology further ahead.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRT; NCAPS; adaptive testing; scoring methods

Year:  2014        PMID: 29880999      PMCID: PMC5978510          DOI: 10.1177/0146621614559517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  7 in total

1.  When a good fit can be bad.

Authors:  Mark A. Pitt; In Jae Myung
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC).

Authors:  Scott I Vrieze
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Quantifying Parsimony in Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Kristopher J Preacher
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Delineating the structure of normal and abnormal personality: an integrative hierarchical approach.

Authors:  Kristian E Markon; Robert F Krueger; David Watson
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2005-01

5.  Examining assumptions about item responding in personality assessment: should ideal point methods be considered for scale development and scoring?

Authors:  Stephen Stark; Oleksandr S Chernyshenko; Fritz Drasgow; Bruce A Williams
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2006-01

6.  Two item response theory models for analysing normative forced-choice personality items.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.380

7.  Psychological scaling without a unit of measurement.

Authors:  C H COOMBS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1950-05       Impact factor: 8.934

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Note on the D-Scoring Method Adapted for Polytomous Test Items.

Authors:  Dimiter M Dimitrov; Yong Luo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.